Maidstone council tried to charge for reviewing housing application decisions
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has uncovered an unusual charging policy during an investigation into a housing complaint about Maidstone Borough Council.
A man, who has disabilities, complained to the Ombudsman that the council wanted to charge him £75 to appeal its decision about joining its housing register.
The man, who uses a wheelchair, told the council his current home was unsuitable for his needs and so he wanted to join the register to bid on an accessible property.
The council considered medical evidence, but decided there was not enough to justify his request for an additional bedroom on medical grounds. But when the man asked the council to review the decision, the council said there would be a £75 charge.
The council’s policy stated those wishing to challenge the medical assessment by way of a second assessment would be charged unless there was a significant change in the medical condition. But the council had no power to make the charge, and anyway, the man did not want to challenge the assessment but the council’s decision based on the assessment.
The Ombudsman’s investigation found fault with the way the council considered evidence, and also failed to follow its own policy by asking him to pay.
The investigation also criticised the council’s review process because it reduced the 21-day period it gives applicants to ask for a review to 14 because of its increasing use of emails and texts. The Ombudsman found that just because it was using these methods more did not mean applicants were and it failed to take account of those with restricted access to the internet or those wishing to rely on the post.
Michael King, Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman, said:
“If the council routinely asks people to pay a fee on any decision where there has been an assessment by an independent medical advisor, people are potentially losing their right to ask for a review at no cost. Many people in the area may have been discouraged from asking for a review by the outlay.
“I welcome the steps the council has already taken to rectify the situation for the family, and hope the additional recommendations I have made will help ensure other families are not affected by the failings I have identified.”
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman’s role is to remedy injustice and share learning from investigations to help improve public, and adult social care, services. During the investigation, the council has agreed to apologise to the man and carry out a review of his application at no cost.
The council has already carried out the review and has backdated this to 23 November 2017. The review also found the man had not missed out on successfully bidding for properties in this time.
The Ombudsman has also recommended the council pay the man £250 for the distress caused.
The Ombudsman has the power to make recommendations to improve processes for the wider public. In this case, the council should review its allocation policy and the lawfulness of its provision for charging. It should also check its records to see if other people have been similarly affected, and pay refunds where people have been charged. It should review decisions where applicants did not proceed with their review request after they were told about the charge.
The council should also carry out staff training.
Latest News from
Draft Public Service Ombudsman Bill laid in Parliament05/12/2016 12:37:21
A new complaints body will provide the public with greater confidence that their voices have been heard.
Ombudsman issues Armed Forces Covenant guidance to councils on Remembrance Day11/11/2019 16:15:00
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has issued new guidance for councils providing services for current and former armed forces personnel.
Somerset council took too long assessing disabled woman’s care needs01/11/2019 11:15:00
Somerset County Council has been criticised by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman after taking too long to assess a vulnerable woman’s care needs.
Trust failed to inform man his cancer was terminal, Ombudsman finds30/10/2019 09:15:00
The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman has found serious failings at Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust (the Trust) following the death of a man whose cancer was misdiagnosed, and who was not informed that his condition was terminal.
Blue badge applications to be reviewed in Sheffield25/10/2019 11:15:00
Sheffield City Council incorrectly assessed people for disabled blue badges, says an investigation by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman.
Ombudsman welcomes Education Committee recommendations on Special Educational Needs23/10/2019 12:25:00
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has welcomed the Education Committee’s findings from its 18-month inquiry into reforms of the SEND system. These include a recommendation to extend the Ombudsman’s jurisdiction to give SEND families a single place to complain about the SEND system.
Ombudsman announces new Expert Advisory Panel22/10/2019 15:42:00
The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman is pleased to announce the members of a newly formed Expert Advisory Panel.
Haringey and Islington councils criticised for how they recovered business rate debts17/10/2019 13:20:00
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has criticised two London councils for the way they tried to recover historic business rate debts.
Bexley council failed to learn from previous school transport complaints11/10/2019 11:15:00
London Borough of Bexley has been heavily criticised by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman after it failed to make agreed improvements to the way it decides school transport applications for children with disabilities.