Maidstone council tried to charge for reviewing housing application decisions
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has uncovered an unusual charging policy during an investigation into a housing complaint about Maidstone Borough Council.
A man, who has disabilities, complained to the Ombudsman that the council wanted to charge him £75 to appeal its decision about joining its housing register.
The man, who uses a wheelchair, told the council his current home was unsuitable for his needs and so he wanted to join the register to bid on an accessible property.
The council considered medical evidence, but decided there was not enough to justify his request for an additional bedroom on medical grounds. But when the man asked the council to review the decision, the council said there would be a £75 charge.
The council’s policy stated those wishing to challenge the medical assessment by way of a second assessment would be charged unless there was a significant change in the medical condition. But the council had no power to make the charge, and anyway, the man did not want to challenge the assessment but the council’s decision based on the assessment.
The Ombudsman’s investigation found fault with the way the council considered evidence, and also failed to follow its own policy by asking him to pay.
The investigation also criticised the council’s review process because it reduced the 21-day period it gives applicants to ask for a review to 14 because of its increasing use of emails and texts. The Ombudsman found that just because it was using these methods more did not mean applicants were and it failed to take account of those with restricted access to the internet or those wishing to rely on the post.
Michael King, Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman, said:
“If the council routinely asks people to pay a fee on any decision where there has been an assessment by an independent medical advisor, people are potentially losing their right to ask for a review at no cost. Many people in the area may have been discouraged from asking for a review by the outlay.
“I welcome the steps the council has already taken to rectify the situation for the family, and hope the additional recommendations I have made will help ensure other families are not affected by the failings I have identified.”
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman’s role is to remedy injustice and share learning from investigations to help improve public, and adult social care, services. During the investigation, the council has agreed to apologise to the man and carry out a review of his application at no cost.
The council has already carried out the review and has backdated this to 23 November 2017. The review also found the man had not missed out on successfully bidding for properties in this time.
The Ombudsman has also recommended the council pay the man £250 for the distress caused.
The Ombudsman has the power to make recommendations to improve processes for the wider public. In this case, the council should review its allocation policy and the lawfulness of its provision for charging. It should also check its records to see if other people have been similarly affected, and pay refunds where people have been charged. It should review decisions where applicants did not proceed with their review request after they were told about the charge.
The council should also carry out staff training.
Latest News from
Draft Public Service Ombudsman Bill laid in Parliament05/12/2016 12:37:21
A new complaints body will provide the public with greater confidence that their voices have been heard.
Medway Council criticised for not reviewing school transport policy properly16/05/2019 16:10:00
Medway Council has been criticised by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman for failing to review its home to school transport policy following an earlier complaint.
Vulnerable man put at risk because of safeguarding failings by Wirral council10/05/2019 14:15:00
A vulnerable man remained at risk from poor care for more than 18 months, despite Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council being alerted to problems, the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has found.
Ombudsman responds to new Ministry guidance for councils08/05/2019 13:38:00
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has welcomed the publication of new guidance for councils on scrutiny by the Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government.
Lancashire County Council criticised for failing to support vulnerable children properly03/05/2019 09:15:00
Lancashire County Council has been criticised by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman for not providing the right support for two vulnerable siblings when they moved to live with their aunt and uncle.
City council to review transport policy for adults with special educational needs following Ombudsman investigation02/05/2019 14:15:00
A Birmingham mother had to drive five hours a day to take her adult son, who had ‘severe and critical needs’, to his specialist college, because Birmingham City Council did not provide him with transport, the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has found.
Cornwall Council takes more than a decade to decide village green application26/04/2019 11:15:00
Cornwall Council has taken more than 11 years to determine a man’s village green application, the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has found.
Mother of murder victim failed by probation provider, Ombudsman finds25/04/2019 15:38:00
A grieving family was let down by Dorset, Devon & Cornwall Community Rehabilitation Company (CRC) due to a number of failings after the tragic murder of their son and brother Adrian Munday, an investigation by the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman has found.
London council and care home amend policies after giving confusing information about fees18/04/2019 12:15:00
London Borough of Barking and Dagenham and Moreland House care home have agreed to change their charging policies after a resident paid too much for her care, the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has said.