'Make the case for drones as a key part of an integrated UK security policy', urge leading practitioners and academics
Drone technology, both civil and military, under proper legal regulation, can continue to deliver ‘significant benefits’ for the UK’s national security policy and economy in the coming decades. That is the conclusion of a new University of Birmingham Policy Commission Report launched this week. But the Government, and especially the Ministry of Defence (MoD), should do more to reach out to the public over what the Commission sees as the globally inevitable use of drones in armed conflict and in domestic surveillance.
The Report, titled The Security Impact of Drones: Challenges and Opportunities for the UK, finds that over the next 20 years, drones – or what the Commission and the RAF prefer to call Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA) – will become an integral part of Britain’s aerospace capability, providing both advanced surveillance and precision weapons delivery. They can support UK forces deployed overseas, as in Afghanistan, or help prevent mass atrocities, as with the British Government’s decision to deploy the RAF Reaper fleet against the Islamic State (ISIS). This decision was announced after the Report was completed but is entirely consistent with its conclusions.
The Report examines the distinctive and unavoidable choices for the United Kingdom over a crucial emerging technology and sets out the under-appreciated distinction between legally constrained British practice and the US Government’s cross-border counter-terrorism strikes which dominate and distort UK public debate.
The Commission considers various moral arguments and concludes that the current and emerging generation of RPA pose no greater ethical challenges than those already involved in decisions to use any other type of UK military asset. The Report shows clearly that the UK has operated its armed Reapers in Afghanistan according to the same exceptionally strict Rules of Engagement (no weapon should be discharged unless there is ‘zero expectation of civilian casualties’) that it applies to manned aircraft.
But the Commission adds its voice to the wider coalition of international opinion that warns against the development of ‘killer robots’ – or what the Commission terms Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems (LAWS) in accordance with the emerging international legal terminology. The Commission believes that it will not be possible to develop autonomous weapons that can meet the core legal obligation under international humanitarian law to distinguish between combatants and civilians. As a result, the Commission recommends that the UK Government take a leading role in the arms control negotiations that are due to resume next month in Geneva. But it recognises that some nations may ignore such restraint. The Commission therefore urges the UK to lead efforts to build a new international consensus around an effective ban.
Launched today (22 October) in Whitehall at the Royal United Services Institute, the Report brings together the expertise of leading academics at the University of Birmingham and senior figures with backgrounds in the military, aerospace industries, the UK’s intelligence and policing communities, and international law.
Policy Commission Chair Sir David Omand, the first UK Security and Intelligence Coordinator and a former Director of GCHQ, said: ‘For too long drone technology has carried a burden of ethical suspicion given its controversial use for counter-terrorist strikes by the US. The recent decision to deploy RAF Reaper to Iraq is a welcome sign in line with our findings of the growing acceptance of RPA technology as an essential component of modern military capability – provided it is used strictly in accordance with international law, in the same way as for other UK weapons systems. RPA add precision targeting capabilities and long loiter times that can minimise civilian losses and protect friendly troops. We need not fear that their use by the UK Armed Forces represents a shift in the ethical framework of modern warfare. RPA will also have an important role in future in civil security and commercial use. This Commission has highlighted the need for more work on the policies for such applications, and we hope that our findings will help clarify the issues that will need more attention, as well as providing a vision for how the UK can exploit this innovative technology.’
Academic lead Professor Nicholas Wheeler, Director of the Institute for Conflict, Cooperation and Security at the University of Birmingham, said: ‘The University of Birmingham has a fine tradition, going back to the beginning of the 20th century, of public policy engagement on matters of emerging national concern, and I am delighted that this Policy Commission, like its five predecessors, has built on this distinguished record. It has been a pleasure to work with the chair, Sir David Omand, and to bring together the diverse expertise of the other Commissioners.’
There are three main obstacles affecting the UK Government’s use of drones that must be overcome: gaining public understanding and acceptance of the legal and ethical soundness of the practice; allaying fears over the potential development of LAWS; and safeguarding British airspace and the privacy of British citizens if drones are to be increasingly used for domestic surveillance and security.
The Report states: ‘With the right policy choices to overcome these challenges, the Commission believes that significant benefits can be reaped – military and civil – from RPA capabilities. We have, in our report, ventured a description of a position of which the UK could be proud over the next 20 years.’
Specifically, the Commission assesses that:
- Future RPA, both ISR [intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance] and armed, based upon a legally sound mandate, should continue to make a positive contribution to UK national security.
- Careful decisions on the deployment and specific use of drones need to be made on a case-by-case basis at a senior level of command.
- There is no convincing ethical objection to acquiring RPA, while the ethical acceptability of their armed use is dependent on context and control. Indeed, it may be positively ethically desirable to use them rather than other kinds of firepower which are less capable of avoiding civilian casualties and which expose UK military personnel to avoidable risk.
- The Ministry of Defence must do more to reassure the public that RPA will continue to be subject to the same strict rules as other weapons systems and to overcome pervasive confusion between RAF practice and the US use of armed drones beyond legally accepted theatres.
- Whatever decisions are taken by the British Government, the threat to deployed UK forces and UK interests from RPA operated by hostile groups and states must be expected to increase.
- The Commission supports the UK Government’s decision not to develop LAWS and urges it to take a leading role in securing an international framework for their control.
- New integrated policies are required to regulate RPA in civil airspace in the UK and on the rules that should apply to their use by police and security authorities for surveillance purposes. The Home Office should lead on drawing up a code of practice and addressing public privacy issues.
For further information, a copy of the full report, or to arrange interviews, please contactStuart Gillespie in the University of Birmingham press office on +44 (0)121 414 9041. Out of hours, please email the press office or call +44 (0)7789 921165.
Notes to editors
- The Security Impact of Drones: Challenges and Opportunities for the UK is the sixth University of Birmingham Policy Commission.
- The University of Birmingham Policy Commissions were established in 2010 with the aim of bringing together leading figures from the public, private and third sectors with Birmingham academics in order to generate new thinking on contemporary issues of global, national and civic concern.
- The University of Birmingham was named The Times and The Sunday Times University of the Year 2013/14.
The Commissioners are:
- Professor Sir David Omand GCB (Chair), Visiting Professor, Department of War Studies, King’s College London
- Professor Nicholas J. Wheeler (Academic Lead), Professor of International Relations, Director of the Institute for Conflict, Cooperation and Security (ICCS), University of Birmingham
- Sir Brian Burridge, Vice President, Strategic Marketing, Finmeccanica UK
- Professor David H. Dunn, Professor of International Politics, University of Birmingham
- Ms Jennifer Gibson, Staff Attorney, Reprieve
- Dr Peter Gray, Senior Research Fellow in Air Power Studies, University of Birmingham
- Professor Keith Hayward, Head of Research, Royal Aeronautical Society, and Associate Fellow, Royal United Services Institute
- Lt Gen (Ret’d) Sir Paul Newton, Director of Strategy and Security Institute, University of Exeter
- Mr Paul Schulte, Senior Visiting Fellow, Centre for Defence Studies, King’s College London, and Honorary Professor, ICCS
- Sir David Veness, Honorary Professor of Terrorism Studies, Centre for the Study of Terrorism and Political Violence, University of St Andrews
- Professor Mark Webber, Professor of International Politics, University of Birmingham
- Ms Elizabeth Wilmshurst, Associate Fellow, International Law, Chatham House
- Professor Stefan Wolff, Professor of International Security, University of Birmingham
Latest News from
IPPR - State should tackle the growth of debt-fuelled private firms providing social care, says think tank19/09/2019 16:35:00
IPPR calls for the state to build and operate new residential care homes, and establish new financial regulator to oversee private providers
IFS - Big new money for schools and FE, but FE spending still over 7% down on 2010 while no growth in school spending per pupil for 13 years19/09/2019 15:35:00
The extra £4.3 billion just committed for schools in England by 2022 will just about reverse the cuts of 8% in spending per pupil since 2009. Even so, an effective 13-year real-terms freeze will still represent an unprecedented period without growth.
IEA: Early signs suggest minimum unit pricing is not having a positive effect on health19/09/2019 14:35:00
Christopher Snowdon responds to new research
JRF responds to Trussell Trust report on Universal Credit19/09/2019 13:35:00
Today, the Trussell Trust has published its new #5WeeksTooLong: why we need to end the wait for Universal Credit report. This new research shows that in areas where Universal Credit has been rolled out for at least a year, food banks in their network have seen a 30% increase in demand.
NIESR reacts to the latest ONS CPI inflation statistics19/09/2019 13:20:00
According to figures released yesterday by the ONS, consumer price index inflation decreased by 0.4 percentage points on the month to 1.7 per cent in the year to August 2019. Our new analysis of 129,762 locally-collected goods and services prices included in the index this month suggests that the slowing of inflation was widespread across the country, driven by fewer firms increasing prices.
NHS hospitals under strain over £80bn PFI bill for just £13bn of actual investment, finds IPPR19/09/2019 12:35:00
Safety hazards, sewage leaks and falling ceilings are major risks at hospitals after decades of underinvestment and the legacy of PFI
Our children need legal guarantees of a stable natural world to save them from a ‘toxic inheritance’, says IPPR19/09/2019 11:35:00
Future Generations Act and votes at 16 would help protect young and those yet to be born from environmental disaster
IEA: Lib Dems offer “illiberal concoction” of public spending and state intervention19/09/2019 10:35:00
Mark Littlewood responds to Jo Swinson's leader's speech
IPPR - Taxing income from wealth the same as income from work could raise £90 billion over five years, report finds19/09/2019 09:35:00
Ending special treatment for capital gains should be a first step in a radical overhaul of the UK’s unfair and outdated tax system, says IPPR
IFG - Government is guilty of repeated outsourcing failures – but Labour’s policy risks throwing away the successes17/09/2019 11:35:00
Labour’s policy of bringing public services back into government hands by default would be a mistake, argues a new report from the Institute for Government. But senior politicians have consistently overstated how much money is saved by outsourcing services.