Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
Mesothelioma compensation: Government must consult again following "maladroit" review
The Justice Committee urges the Government to undertake a fresh consultation, in its report into mesothelioma claims.
- Report: Mesothelioma claims
- Report: Mesothelioma claims (PDF)
- Inquiry: Mesothelioma claims
- Justice Committee
The Justice Committee concludes, in a report published today, that the Government’s review of mesothelioma claims under section 48 of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) was not prepared in a thorough and even-handed manner, and it calls on the Government to undertake a fresh consultation.
On other matters to do with the mesothelioma claims process, the Committee:
- urges expedition of the primary legislation needed to bring into effect the Third Party (Rights Against Insurers) Act 2010, which will enable a claim to be issued against an insurer without a judgment first having had to be obtained against an insolvent insured party
- calls for the Ministry of Justice to work in tandem with the Department of Health to reduce delays in the production of medical records of mesothelioma victims.
The Chair of the Committee, Rt Hon Sir Alan Beith MP, said:
“We listened carefully to views on both sides of an emotive and polarised debate about the process of claiming compensation for this terrible disease, caused by exposure to asbestos. We have concluded that the Government’s approach has been unsatisfactory on a number of counts.
The Government was not reconciled to the concession it was forced to make in Parliament during the passage of the LASPO legislation to exempt mesothelioma cases from its provisions, and determined to review the exemption as soon as it could.
In its haste the Government failed to ensure that relevant information, such as a cost-benefit analysis of the changes, was available to interested parties. It also shoehorned part of its section 48 review into a wider consultation on changes to the mesothelioma claims process, most of which were not proceeded with.
We also believe the Government should take urgent action to legislate to bring the Third Party (Rights Against Insurers) Act 2010 into force, and should reduce delays in the production of medical records. Both these steps would improve the claims process for mesothelioma victims”.
The Government’s review was into whether sections 44 and 46 of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 should apply to mesothelioma compensation claims, as they already do to other personal injury claims. Under these sections, successful claimants pursuing cases under conditional fee agreements may no longer reclaim from losing parties the success fees charged by their own lawyers; nor may they reclaim the cost of taking out insurance against having to pay the other side’s costs, so-called after-the-event insurance.
The Government contends that other reforms brought in to civil litigation funding arrangements, including a 10% uplift in the level of general damages for personal injury claims, will mean that claimants are likely to receive a net financial benefit, but this was contested by claimant representatives and their lawyers.
In its inquiry the Committee heard evidence that success fees charged by claimant lawyers were too high, given the degree of risk involved in bringing mesothelioma claims.
As a result, the Committee recommends that the Government commission an independent review of the risks of success and failure of all mesothelioma cases to inform the setting of a maximum level of success fee, expressed as a percentage of costs, for lawyers representing claimants in such cases.
In the course of the Committee’s inquiry, the Association of British Insurers (ABI) provided it with a copy of a Heads of Agreement document drawn up between the Association and the Government in 2012. The ABI and the Government both argued that this document did not constitute a binding contract, and some important proposals contained in it have not been implemented.
The Committee is however critical of the fact that the Government was not open and transparent about the existence of this document, either with the Committee itself or with other participants in the debate, including mesothelioma victims themselves.
Sir Alan Beith added:
“It was a surprise to us that the Government concluded a heads of agreement, however informal its status, with parties on one side of the argument about mesothelioma. The provisions of this document, which remained undisclosed to other interested parties, have shaped the Government’s approach to this issue, and we are concerned that the Government appears to have had no intention of supplying us with this document as part of our inquiry.
Latest News from
Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
Chancellor should seek long-term solutions to fire-up business recovery, say MPs26/02/2021 15:33:00
The Chancellor should use next week’s Budget to address gaps in financial support, affecting the self-employed, mothers who have recently taken maternity leave, and those working in sectors such as the creative industries, say the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) Committee in an interim pre-budget report on The impact of Coronavirus on businesses and workers, published today.
Transport Committee to investigate the roll-out and safety of Smart Motorways26/02/2021 11:38:00
The benefits and safety of Smart Motorways are to be investigated by the Transport Committee in a new inquiry, launching today.
Post-Brexit Channel Tunnel sovereignty and safety solutions recommended23/02/2021 15:33:00
The European Scrutiny Committee of the House of Commons has made a series of recommendations on the way safety rules are set for the Channel Tunnel.
Access to pension savings inquiry launched23/02/2021 12:25:00
The Work and Pensions Committee investigates access to pension savings in the second part of its broad inquiry into the impact of the pension freedoms and the protection of savers.
Children in care homes: Education Committee to launch new inquiry18/02/2021 15:33:00
The Education Committee is to carry out an inquiry into children’s homes, as part of its continuing work examining the issues faced by left behind groups.
MPs to discuss petition relating to the movement of goods between Great Britain and Northern Ireland17/02/2021 14:38:00
On Monday 22 February, MPs will discuss a petition relating to the movement of goods between Great Britain and Northern Ireland in the latest e-petition session scheduled by the Petitions Committee.
Government must set out how and when it will lift lockdown restrictions with economic and epidemiological modelling to support it16/02/2021 13:33:00
The Treasury Committee has published the third report of its inquiry into the Economic Impact of Coronavirus – ‘Gaps in Support and Economic Analysis’.
Vulnerable Children and public services16/02/2021 11:25:00
Peers will examine how well public services tackle underlying causes of child vulnerability in families including domestic abuse, poor mental health and addiction.