Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
MoD must be subject to Corporate Manslaughter charges, Committee says
The Defence Committee publishes its Third Report, "Beyond endurance? Military exercises and the duty of care", which calls for the Ministry of Defence (MoD) to be subject to charges under the Corporate Manslaughter charges without exemption.
- Report: Beyond endurance? Military exercises and the duty of care
- Report: Beyond endurance? Military exercises and the duty of care (PDF 758 KB)
- Inquiry: Beyond endurance? Military exercises and the duty of care
- Defence Sub-Committee
The findings are the result of an in-depth inquiry by the Defence Sub-Committee.
Report key findings
The Report finds that it is wrong for the MoD and Armed Forces to have exemptions under the Corporate Manslaughter and Homicide Act 2007 in situations where they have been penalised by Crown Censure for serious failings in hazardous training and selection events.
Between 1 January 2000 and 20 February 2016, 135 Armed Forces personnel died whilst on training and exercise.
Since January 2000 there have been 11 Crown Censures: the highest penalty that can be issued to the MoD by the Health and Safety Executive.
At present, the MoD and Armed Forces have exemptions where they cannot be prosecuted under the Corporate Manslaughter and Homicide Act 2007. While strongly endorsing the existing exemption for military operations, the Sub-Committee says that this must change in relation to hazardous training and selection events and the current complete exemption for Specialist Military Units.
Balance between training and reducing risk
While the report found no systemic failings in the policies for managing risk during training and selection events, it argues that the MoD has not always got the correct balance between adequate training and reducing risk. This has resulted in life-changing injuries and deaths in training and selection events.
Level of acceptable risk
The level of acceptable risk will vary with the desired training outcomes. While Specialist Military Units will need more rigorous training and selection events because they are required to do "exceptional things", this should be coupled with more stringent risk assessments and preparations. The report argues that training should remain rigorous because it is important for troops to be properly prepared for armed conflict.
Concept of 'training in'
The Sub-Committee was impressed by the training seen at the Commando Training Centre in Lympstone. In particular with the practical application of the concept of 'training in' every Marine rather than adopting the older and rather more familiar adage of 'selecting out' those who don't immediately make the grade.
In this toughest of training environments it was clear that there was a good relationship between trainers and trainees, that facilities for medical and rehabilitation care were excellent and accessible, and that the newly-adopted Duty Holder Concept was fully integrated into their processes.
A key focus of the Report has been on the accountability measures which can be used from Service Inquiries to coroner-led investigations and inquests.
Defence Safety Authority and Duty Holder Concept
The MoD is moving in the right direction. Evidence of this can be found in the creation of the Defence Safety Authority in 2015 which has, among other things, responsibility for the conduct of independent service inquiries into safety-related fatalities and the roll out of the Duty Holder Concept.
The Sub-Committee was impressed by the evidence provided by witnesses to the inquiry and wish to thank everyone who provided assistance in its deliberations.
Chair of the Sub-Committee, Mrs Madeleine Moon MP, says:
"In general the Armed Forces take very seriously the risks associated with the way it trains for war fighting. But there have been a small number of serious yet avoidable failings in training safety and risk assessment which need to be addressed. So where a Crown Censure has been issued, it should be possible to prosecute the MoD. The lives of serving personnel are worth no less than those of civilians and those responsible for their deaths must be equally liable under the law."
On accountability measures
"While it is important that the MoD and the Armed Services are accountable for all accidents and fatalities it is equally important that they are publicly seen to be so. The families and friends of those who have died whilst on training and selection events need to have confidence that that lessons have been learned for the future."
Latest News from
Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
'Inappropriate powers' in Sanctions Bill says Lords Committee17/11/2017 15:05:00
The Constitution Committee today warns that the Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Bill, the first Brexit bill to be scrutinised by the House of Lords, contains inappropriately broad powers for ministers.
Government response on Licencing Act published17/11/2017 11:25:00
The Government has published its response to the report by the Select Committee on the Licencing Act 2003.
'Catastrophic' if viable customs system not in place at Brexit15/11/2017 09:25:00
The Public Accounts Committee report warns Government must do more to work with businesses and ensure contingency option in place well before January 2019.
Government's initial proposals for scrutiny of Brexit-related delegated legislation inadequate06/11/2017 09:20:00
The Procedure Committee is calls for a new and effective "sifting committee" to be set up to determine which proposed pieces of delegated legislation need detailed scrutiny by MPs as EU law is transferred into UK law.