Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
More robust approach required for aid contractors
The Department for International Development (DFID) is urged to take a more robust approach to the procurement, oversight and evaluation of the delivery of aid programmes by contractors.
- Read the report Summary
- Read the conclusions and recommendations
- Read the full report: DFID's use of private sector contractors
The growing role of aid contractors in the delivery of UK aid presents new challenges for DFID, which has become a commissioning organisation rather than one of delivery. For the purposes of this report, the term ‘contractors’ refers to private sector organisations, many of which operate on a for-profit basis.
In DFID’s use of private sector contractors, the Committee says that contractors can act as an effective channel for aid delivery and one that the Committee supports - where it is proven to be most effective and offers the best value for money.
However, weaknesses in procurement, noted by the National Audit Office as a challenge across Government departments, mean this is an area where effective scrutiny is essential to delivering value for money. The Report concludes that while there may be good reasons for DFID to employ contractors, there are also longstanding concerns.
DFID’s understanding of the contractor market: We recognise that DFID is ahead of other donors in creating a competitive supplier market, but the rewards for contractors should lie in delivering contracts, not winning them. DFID assumes that levels of competition in the supplier market will assure value for money but their procurement processes influence and shape the market in a way that evidence suggests it does not fully understand. Greater understanding of the supply chain, including the impact of procurement processes on smaller organisations, is necessary to achieve the Department’s aims of more effective use of contractors.
Conduct of contractors: DFID sets rules for contractors but relies on self-regulation and fails to enforce them. It is not evident that DFID has an effective process for assessing effectiveness of individual contractors at programme level, nor whether it undertakes a sufficiently robust appraisal of all available options. It needs to do more to ensure that contractors are adhering to the principles that drive the Department’s mission. While competitive pressures in the market can drive value for money, they can also drive poor behaviours in contractors trying to seek a commercial advantage.
Fees for contractors: DFID should consider a framework to ensure greater control and transparency over fees charged by consultants.
The report calls for a direct response to an earlier call for DFID to investigate the idea of an arms-length body to assume programme management responsibilities.
Stephen Twigg MP, Chair of the Committee, said:
“The Committee has recently commended DFID’s effectiveness in fighting poverty around the world, but also noted even more could be done. This report seeks to expand on how the Department can achieve this by enhancing its strategy, procurement processes and supplier market to deliver more effective programming through contractors.
DFID has taken some steps to improving working relationships with contractors. However, there are real concerns, also reflected by the Secretary of State and in media that clear parameters should be set for this work. We agree with Priti Patel that DFID’s contractors and partners should be held to the highest standards and there should be ‘no room for excessive profiteering or unethical practices’ in this work to deliver aid to the poorest people across the globe.
We urge DFID to ensure that a key focus of its forthcoming Supplier Review is on ensuring greater compliance and a more robust system of incentives and consequences so that the behaviour of contractors is shaped to the highest ethical standards.
The International Development Committee has a role in holding Ministers to account. In the process of this inquiry, we have responded to media and public concern about the proper administration of public money. This inquiry demonstrates how Parliament can investigate and scrutinise these issues in a balanced and evidence-based way.”
Conduct of Adam Smith International
During the inquiry, the Committee had cause to investigate allegations of improper behaviour by Adam Smith International, a leading aid contractor. The report concluded that the organisation went well beyond what was appropriate and ‘acted improperly.’
While it is recognised that not all contractors behave poorly, the Report reflects the Committee’s serious concern that some contractors behave in a way that is entirely misaligned with the Department's purpose. DFID requires contractors to sign up to its Statement of Priorities and Expectations, but the report highlights a worrying over-reliance on self-regulation and a complete lack of enforcement.
- Report: Conduct of Adam Smith International
- About Parliament: Select committees
- Visiting Parliament: Watch committees
Latest News from
Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
Chair calls on Government to publish list of companies that received furlough money19/10/2020 15:33:00
The Public Accounts Committee is calling on HMRC to give a more honest picture of the likely levels of the so called “tax gap” – between tax that should be paid on the UK’s economic activity and the tax that HMRC actually collects – whether caused by deliberate evasion of various kinds or accidental taxpayer error.
Business Committee demand answers from fashion, retail and tech businesses19/10/2020 12:33:00
The Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) Committee has written to a range of businesses in sectors including fashion, retail and information technology, to seek answers in relation to the Committee’s inquiry exploring the extent to which businesses in the UK are exploiting the forced labour of Uyghur in the Xinjiang region of China.
UK Internal Market Bill violates the rule of law and threatens to undermine devolution arrangements, says Committee19/10/2020 11:38:00
The Constitution Committee has published its 17th report of the session on the UK Internal Market Bill.
Government should remove Part 5 of the UK Internal Market Bill16/10/2020 15:33:00
The House of Lords EU Committee has today published its report on the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill: Part 5.
MPs to examine risks to survival of community sports16/10/2020 13:43:00
A new inquiry launched by the DCMS Committee will examine the risks to the future of community sport, highlighted by the Covid-19 pandemic.
Treasury Committee seeks update on Bank Signature Forgery Campaign16/10/2020 11:38:00
There have been allegations of potential criminal activity occurring at banks, whereby home repossessions and other such documents are not being signed by the authorised signatory.
Committee reports on 2021 EU budget and the removal of lobster tariffs15/10/2020 15:33:00
In its latest report, the European Scrutiny Committee considers recent draft EU legislation and policy documents deposited in Parliament by the Government.
Committee asks questions about future UK food safety rules15/10/2020 13:43:00
The Common Frameworks Scrutiny Committee has written to the Food Standards Agency’s Chief Executive, Emily Miles, to confirm its intention to scrutinise the Food and Feed Safety and Hygiene (FFSH) framework.
FCA takes “welcome step” in asking banks to warn expats of account closures15/10/2020 11:38:00
There have been reports that customers of UK banks living in the European Union have received letters informing them that their current accounts will be closed once the transition period with the EU ends on 31 December 2020.