|Printable version||E-mail this to a friend|
NEF - UK to blame for poor quota deal for its fishers
Fishing industry was told Brexit would return control over UK waters – but British ministers already have the power to act
New analysis from the New Economics Foundation finds that the UK is failing to manage its fisheries in the public interest:
UK fisheries score poorly: lagging behind other European countries on accessibility, fairness and representative decision-making
Smaller fleets losing out: large-scale operations have been allowed to dominate the industry and reap huge profits, while smaller boats are struggling to access quotas and break even
UK powers are under-used: ministers could support smaller fleets by adjusting quota allocations to diversify access to fish stocks, as well as updating the tax system to maximise benefits to struggling fishers and ports
Brexit won’t lead to more control: the UK system of allocating quotas is determined by UK ministers, not Brussels
The Foundation’s research – the first comprehensive assessment of EU fishing quotas and how they are allocated by national governments – shows wide variation across 12 EU Member States, but a universal failure to get the best results for industry or the public.
While total allowable catch in European waters is agreed through negotiations with EU ministers, distribution of fishing rights is then determined by individual governments.
The Foundation’s analysis shows there is much more individual Member States, including the UK, can do to fairly grant access to fish stocks.
Griffin Carpenter, Economist at the New Economics Foundation, said:
“Fisheries must be sustainable but they should also be fair. Through better management of its fishing opportunities, the UK can support fishers and coastal communities – many of whom are struggling under huge financial pressure.”
“The Leave campaign promised that Brexit would allow UK fishers to take back control, but the reality is that big decisions on who fishes what in Britain’s seas are already Westminster’s to take.”
“UK ministers must take more responsibility. There are steps they can take today to ensure fair access for small-scale fishers in ports across Britain.”
Fish stocks are a vital public resource, and access to them is a heated subject across the EU and within individual Member States. Governments have approached the question of access in different ways.
The Foundation’s report examines how 12 EU Member States (Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, and the UK) make that decision – and the consequences that this can have.
The systems in place vary significantly. While fishers in Belgium and the Netherlands fish many of the same species in the same waters, the government-rationed quotas of the former and market for ownership rights in the latter are worlds apart in management approach.
A successful system should allow fishers to thrive and the public to benefit, all while ensuring an accountable and fair decision-making process. The report sets out a framework of objectives that reflect this.
While some Member States are performing better than others, in all cases fisheries management is shown to be costly to administer and generates little public revenue. Obtaining access to the fishing industry for new entrants is difficult, and the transparency of many systems of fishing opportunities is low.
More must be done by individual governments to improve systems and fishing to deliver the best results for their citizens.
View report here
Latest News from
Kings Fund - Chance to put mental health at heart of NHS services could be missed19/05/2017 13:35:00
A key opportunity to revolutionise mental health care could be missed because flagship NHS schemes are not doing enough to put it at the heart of services, according to a new report by The King’s Fund and the Royal College of Psychiatrists.
IFS - More hours, more children, and more spending: early years and childcare proposals from Labour and the Liberal Democrats19/05/2017 12:35:00
The Labour party is proposing a major extension to government support for early childhood education and care (ECEC) in England.
IEA - Interventionist manifesto does go some way to improve intergenerational fairness19/05/2017 11:35:00
Reaction to Conservative Party manifesto
The King's Fund responds to the Conservative Party's manifesto19/05/2017 10:35:00
Chris Ham, Chief Executive of The King’s Fund, said: ‘Having raised expectations of major changes to social care funding, the Conservative Party’s manifesto is deeply disappointing. Instead of fundamental reform, these proposals involve tinkering with a broken system and do not provide the sustainable solution that is desperately needed.
IFS - Moving from a Triple to a Double Lock does little to long-run state pension affordability19/05/2017 09:35:00
Yesterday’s Conservative manifesto announced that from 2020 onwards the state pension would be increased over time in line with average earnings or inflation whichever is highest – the so-called ‘Double Lock’.