NIESR Comment on 2016 Budget
Earlier on yesterday the Chancellor unveiled the 2016 Budget at the House of Commons. Here is our Principal Research Fellow Jonathan Portes comment from yesterday:
"In August 2015, I noted that the government's fiscal framework contained serious design flaws, and was "simply incredible." Today's Budget shows that assessment was accurate. The OBR had already assessed, in the Autumn Statement, that the government would breach the so-called welfare cap. Today the OBR reaffirms that assessment and also states that the government has failed to hit its other short-term target, for the debt-GDP ratio to fall in every year of this Parliament. Meanwhile, the OBR states that the government is on target to deliver a surplus in 2019-20 - but only because, as the OBR put it " by rescheduling capital investment, promising other cuts in public services spending and shifting a one-off boost to corporation tax receipts into that year". The point of a fiscal rule is to boost credibility - meeting it only by the use of one-off accounting gimmicks entirely defeats the point.
It is also notable that the main changes to today's economic and fiscal forecasts are not the result of weakness in the global economy or uncertainty in financial markets, although these do represent significant risks. Instead, as the OBR states, "the most significant forecast change we have made since November has been to revise down potential productivity growth". The continued weakness of UK productivity performance remains a serious concern.
Finally, it is worth noting that delivery and implementation failures related to welfare changes, particularly related to disability benefits, continue to push up OBR forecasts of welfare spend, as I previously noted. It is partly to offset these failures that the Government has chosen to make significant cuts, worth about £1.2 billion to payments in respect of "aids and appliances" to claimants of the new Personal Independence Payment. Looking to the future, the OBR rightly expresses "significant concern" over the modelling of the costs of Universal Credit, which it regards as highly unreliable at present. "
To discuss further please contact:
Jonathan Portes: 0207 654 1908 / firstname.lastname@example.org
You can follow all the latest from NIESR on Twitter (#NIESRBudget)
To arrange interviews and for further information please contact NIESR Press Office or Luca Pieri at email@example.com
NIESR aims to promote, through quantitative and qualitative research, a deeper understanding of the interaction of economic and social forces that affect people's lives, and the ways in which policies can improve them.
Latest News from
Reward farmers who help fight climate and nature crisis, urges IPPR think tank13/05/2021 14:35:00
Now the UK has left the EU’s agricultural schemes, the government should seize the opportunity to transform farming to protect the environment and secure the livelihoods of farmers, according to a new IPPR report.
IEA - Nanny statists have “exploited” this pandemic, says new research13/05/2021 13:35:00
Governments are increasingly adopting higher sin taxes and more prohibitions, finds the 2021 Nanny State Index
IFS - Elective hospital admissions dropped by a third last year, while outpatient appointments and non-COVID emergency admissions each fell by a fifth13/05/2021 12:35:00
New analysis by the Institute for Fiscal Studies, Harvard University and Imperial College London shows there were 2.9 million fewer planned admissions, 1.2 million fewer non-COVID-19 emergency inpatient admissions and 17.1 million fewer outpatient appointments between March and December 2020 compared with the same period in 2019.
Policy needs to adjust following encouraging GDP data, says IEA expert13/05/2021 11:35:00
Julian Jessop, Economics Fellow at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, commented on the latest GDP and trade data from the Office for National Statistics
Queen's speech: IPPR reaction to ‘policy gulf’ on environment, planning, health and care agenda13/05/2021 10:35:00
Think tank welcomes some targets and commitments, but says bold action and clear policy must follow
Ill-considered ‘junk food’ ad ban “has to be binned”, says IEA expert13/05/2021 09:35:00
Christopher Snowdon, Head of Lifestyle Economics at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs responded to renewed government plans to ban ‘junk food’ advertising
Adam Smith Inst - "Nutty nanny statism": Government plans to ban 'junk food' advertising online and after 9.00pm11/05/2021 16:35:00
The Adam Smith Institute’s Head of Research Matthew Lesh responded to the Government maintaining plans to ban so-called ‘junk food’ from online advertising and before 9.00pm on television
“Unlikely to supercharge economic growth”: IEA experts respond to Queen’s Speech11/05/2021 15:35:00
Mark Littlewood, Director General at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, commented on the Queen’s Speech
JRF - Queen’s Speech: Where is the Employment Bill for low-paid workers?11/05/2021 14:35:00
JRF responds to today's Queen's Speech
The apprenticeship levy should be scrapped completely, says IEA expert11/05/2021 13:35:00
Professor Len Shackleton, Editorial and Research Fellow at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, responded to the news that £1bn of apprenticeship levy funds has gone unspent in the nine months since last May