NIESR: Uncharted territory: the Implications of Leaving the EU Think
The latest issue of the National Institute Economic Review, edited by Angus Armstrong and Jonathan Portes, brings together some of the leading academic researchers on EU issues in the UK, under the auspices of the ESRC’s UK in a Changing Europe programme, to examine the UK's place in the EU and the implications of the referendum. Five articles are included:
- Britain's influence in the EU, by Anand Menon and John-Paul Salter (King’s College London)
- Immigration, free movement and the EU referendum, by Jonathan Portes (NIESR)
- The free movement of services, migration, and leaving the EU, by Catharine Barnard and Amy Ludlow (University of Cambridge)
- EU membership, financial services and stability, by Angus Armstrong (NIESR)
- The EU budget and UK contributions by Iain Begg (London School of Economics)
Menon and Salter find that, despite headlines about the UK being ‘outvoted’, that at least up until the most recent period, the UK has been relatively successful in influencing policy, in both a negative (preventative) and positive (proposing) sense. In many ways the UK has steered the EU in its own preferred direction of market liberalisation combined with national control of social policies. However, the run-up to the referendum may have eroded our credibility and hence our ability to advance this agenda. If we vote to Remain, re-establishing the UK’s centrality to EU debates will be an urgent task.
Portes notes that a vote to Remain will unequivocally be a vote for the status quo as regards EU migration and free movement. Leaving would increase flexibility but hard choices would remain. Ending free movement might allow a more liberal approach to non-EU migration, particularly of skilled workers, with consequent economic benefits; but it is also seems plausible that policy might become significantly more restrictive overall, since even a large reduction in EU migration would leave overall net migration well above the government’s target. Portes concludes that leaving the EU would not alter the fundamental tradeoff between reducing immigration and promoting economic growth.
Latest News from
IEA - Most workers confined to home unable to work productively, report reveals31/03/2020 11:35:00
No more than 15% of healthy workers confined to their homes will work productively, argues new research from the Institute of Economic Affairs.
Covid-19: Emergency support package needed to save ‘children of the pandemic’ from becoming its unseen victims - IPPR31/03/2020 10:35:00
Right to paid parental leave, extra family cash, help accessing online learning and priority use of parks ‘essential’ to protect children from widening poverty, education and health gaps
IEA - Steps to help self-employed “unlikely to be the last” Chancellor has to take27/03/2020 15:15:00
Julian Jessop, Economics Fellow at the Institute of Economic Affairs, commented on Chancellor Rishi Sunak’s plans to support the self-employed during the Covid-19 pandemic
JRF - Government must go further to protect people on low incomes from impact of coronavirus27/03/2020 13:15:00
New JRF briefing briefing urges the Government to go further to protect people on low incomes from the impact of coronavirus.
IPPR - Take a 30 per cent stake in virus-hit airlines, and hold shares in a new UK wealth fund, Chancellor urged26/03/2020 11:35:00
Price of ‘bailing out’ any companies should be equity which will generate long-term returns, say economists in IPPR discussion paper
IEA - Gender pay gap figures “never fit for purpose”26/03/2020 10:35:00
IEA responds to government decision to suspend enforcement of gender pay gap reporting in light of the Covid-19 pandemic
Lift restrictions on migrants’ rights to help limit the spread of Covid-19, says IPPR26/03/2020 09:35:00
New IPPR analysis reveals migrants are more vulnerable to economic and health fallout of the virus outbreak
Civitas - Human rights laws should be decided democratically in Britain – the constitution needs rebalancing24/03/2020 11:35:00
The Human Rights Act should be abolished as Britain seeks to regain the ability to decide its own human rights laws within its own democratic public sphere, a new Civitas publication argues.