New IFG report: Voting on Brexit - Parliament’s role before 31 October
When MPs return to Parliament after the summer recess there will be less than two months until the UK is set to leave the EU.
The options facing the UK haven’t changed: leaving with a deal, leaving without a deal, seeking an extension or unilaterally revoking Article 50. But the prime minister has changed, and Boris Johnson says that if the UK is unable to leave with a renegotiated deal on 31 October then the UK will leave without a deal.
A new paper by the Institute for Government says MPs looking to make their voices heard will have far fewer opportunities to do so this time around than they had in the run-up to the end of March this year, when the former prime minister was trying to pass her withdrawal agreement.
Given the limited time available, this paper reaches the following conclusions about what is likely to happen over the next few months:
- It is very unlikely the UK will be able to leave the EU with a deal on 31 October
- MPs can express opposition to no deal but that alone will not prevent it
- Backbenchers have very few opportunities to legislate to stop no deal
- A vote of no confidence would not necessarily stop no deal
- There is little time to hold a general election before 31 October
- A second referendum can only happen with government support.
Joe Owen, Brexit Programme Director, said:
“MPs looking to force the Government into a change of approach face a huge challenge when Parliament returns. Even if they can assemble a majority for something, they may find few opportunities to make their move – and time is running out.”
Notes to editors
Latest News from
The Spending Review is 'unlikely to be enough to address health and care pressures': The King's Fund responds to the Spending Review26/11/2020 14:35:00
Sally Warren, Director of Policy at The King’s Fund, responded to the Chancellor’s Spending Review
Initial reaction from IFS researchers on Spending Review 2020 and OBR forecasts26/11/2020 13:35:00
IFS Director Paul Johnson says: “Rishi Sunak has been spending truly astonishing amounts of money this year and plans to continue to do so next year in response to Covid.
Spending Review 2020: IPPR response26/11/2020 12:35:00
Spending review misunderstands 'basic economics' and will leave economy needlessly damaged
Rishi cannot tax our way out of debt or spend our way out of a recession — Adam Smith Institute26/11/2020 11:35:00
Following the spending review by the Chancellor, the Adam Smith Institute’s Deputy Director Matt Kilcoyne criticises the public sector spending splurge
Chancellor’s words ring hollow as less is spent on levelling up - JRF26/11/2020 10:35:00
Helen Barnard, Director of the independent Joseph Rowntree Foundation responded to the Chancellor’s Spending Review
IEA - The Chancellor’s diagnosis was correct but “the medicine is inadequate”26/11/2020 09:35:00
Mark Littlewood, Director General at the free-market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, responded to the Chancellor’s Spending Review
Adam Smith Inst - UK Free Speech Under Threat24/11/2020 13:35:00
Government should introduce a United Kingdom Free Speech Act modelled on the First Amendment of the USA
Civitas - Think-tank report warns of dangers that campus relations at universities are becoming ‘racialised’ – as sector seeks to address disparities through ethnic grouping24/11/2020 12:35:00
“There is a real danger that campus relations at universities will become racialised”, says Dr Ruth Mieschbuehler, in this new report for Civitas.
Public sector pay freeze “appropriate” at this time, says IEA expert24/11/2020 11:35:00
Professor Len Shackleton, Editorial and Research Fellow at the free-market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, responded to reports that the Treasury will announce a public sector pay freeze in this week’s Spending Review
IFS - Minimum unit pricing works better if implemented alongside reformed alcohol taxes24/11/2020 10:35:00
The UK government has put out a call for evidence, seeking views on how well the alcohol duty system currently works and how it could be reformed. In new IFS research – funded by the European Research Council and the Economic and Social Research Council and published last week- we show that minimum unit prices for alcohol are reasonably well targeted at heavy drinkers, but come at the cost of hindering competition and reducing tax revenues. A minimum unit price, combined with a more coherent set of taxes on alcohol, would be just as well targeted at heavy drinkers and would limit the fall in revenue for the exchequer.