New guidelines introduce robust approach to sentencing of breaches of court orders
Today, the Sentencing Council has published new guidelines for judges and magistrates for when they are sentencing offenders who have breached court orders.
The guidelines provide a clear approach which will mean a tightening up of the way courts deal with offenders who have not complied with a wide range of orders such as suspended sentence orders, community orders, restraining orders and sexual harm prevention orders.
It is the first time there have been comprehensive guidelines setting out a consistent approach for courts to use and they will help ensure that if an offender breaches a court order, sentencers impose appropriate penalties according to the seriousness of the breach.
The guideline includes guidance on sentencing ten different types of breach. The guidelines for breaches of community orders, suspended sentence orders and post sentence supervision will help courts assess the seriousness of any breach by looking at how much the offender has kept to the terms of their order and how deliberate any breach of the order has been. Breaches of community orders and suspended sentence orders may at one end of the scale involve an uncharacteristic breach after good overall compliance and at the other, wilful and persistent non-compliance from the start.
The guidelines will also tighten up courts’ approach to dealing with these breaches. Courts are required to follow guidelines and these guidelines closely reflect legislation and define more clearly appropriate court responses to breaches.
For example, in relation to suspended sentence orders, legislation states that they must be activated – i.e. the offender will be sent to prison – in the event of a breach unless it would be unjust to do so. The guideline gives clearer guidance on this consideration, and offenders will now not get opportunities to avoid their sentence being activated. For activation to be considered to be unjust, there would need to be new and exceptional circumstances – not present at the time the order was imposed – that prevented them from complying with the order. This might involve for example the offender taking on caring for a disabled relative which greatly affects their ability to comply with an unpaid work requirement.
The guideline also covers breaches of orders imposed to prevent particular behaviour or protect individuals or groups from it, such as sexual harm prevention orders and restraining orders. The guidelines prompt courts to look at an offender’s motivation and intention in committing a breach to assess the seriousness of the breach. The guidelines also instruct courts to look at any harm caused, and for the first time in a guideline, the risk of harm being caused.
Including a focus on risk of harm for such breaches helps ensure appropriate sentences are imposed where a breach presents a serious risk of harm to the public, without any actual harm needing to have occurred. This could include for example a sex offender who fails to comply with notification requirements with the intention of evading detection in order to commit further offences.
Sentencing Council member Julian Goose said: “Court orders are there to protect individuals and the wider public from particular types of offending or continuing criminal behaviour by offenders. Making sure that offenders comply with court orders is crucial in reinforcing public confidence in sentencing. Where offenders do not comply, the public have a right to expect that this is properly addressed by the courts. We are giving courts clear guidance on what action should be taken against those offenders who ignore court orders so that they are dealt with robustly and consistently.”
The guideline will come into effect in courts on 1 October 2018.
Latest News from
Public confidence in sentencing and the criminal justice system08/08/2019 13:10:00
We have published a report of research carried out to help the Council better understand public attitudes towards, and understanding of, sentencing and the criminal justice system.
Sentencing Council Annual Report 2018/1915/07/2019 09:15:00
The Sentencing Council has published its ninth annual report outlining activities from April 2018 to March 2019.
New definitive guidelines for arson and criminal damage offences published05/07/2019 14:10:00
We have published new sentencing guidelines for arson and criminal damage offences that will see the courts take full account of the harm caused by offences such as arson attacks on historic buildings or criminal damage leading to severe disruption of public services.
Proposals for sentencing offenders with mental health conditions published09/04/2019 11:15:00
Proposed guidance for sentencing offenders with mental health conditions and disorders was published today in a consultation launched by the Sentencing Council.
Theft Offences: assessing the impact of the definitive guideline05/02/2019 16:20:00
The Sentencing Council has completed an assessment of the impact of the Theft Offences Definitive Guideline.
Sentencing Council launches online sentencing guidelines for use in the Crown Court08/11/2018 12:20:00
From today, sentencing guidelines used in the Crown Court are available online for judges, legal practitioners and other visitors to the Sentencing Council website.
New sentencing guidelines introduced for child cruelty offences and failing to protect a girl from the risk of female genital mutilation07/09/2018 12:10:00
Yesterday, the Sentencing Council published a new guideline for how those guilty of child cruelty offences should be sentenced.
Collaborating to shape the future of sentencing research - Innovation and impact06/08/2018 09:10:00
The Sentencing Council for England and Wales, in collaboration with the Centre for the Study of Legal Professional Practice at the City Law School, City, University of London, invite you to a seminar on Wednesday 7th November 2018 from 10am to 4pm.