Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
New inquiry: The Windrush Compensation Scheme
The Home Affairs Committee has launched a new inquiry into the Windrush Compensation Scheme.
The new inquiry will examine the design and implementation of compensation processes and the support that is provided to individuals through the ‘Windrush Scheme: support in exceptional circumstances’ policy. It aims to understand whether these schemes are operating effectively for people who apply and whether changes are needed so that people who apply feel their applications have been considered fairly and swiftly. It would also like to know what the Home Office can do to provide better support to anyone who applies to the scheme.
The Home Office estimated the overall cost of the Windrush Compensation Scheme to be between £90 million and £250 million, based on a planning assumption of 11,500 eligible claims. However, as at the end of September 2020, 1,587 applications had been received and £1,619,291.42 had been paid to 196 claims. The Home Office’s Comprehensive Improvement Plan, drawn up in response to the Windrush Lessons Learned Review, says that a further £1.2 million had been offered to individuals and was either awaiting acceptance or pending a review. The Home Secretary has written to the Committee to say that, at the end of March 2020, 35 of the 142 requests for an urgent and exceptional payment had been approved, with payments totalling £46,796.08.
Launching the inquiry, Chair of the Home Affairs Committee Rt Hon Yvette Cooper said:
“It has been two and a half years since the Home Affairs Committee called for a Compensation Scheme to recognise the financial loss and emotional distress experienced by those who were affected by the Windrush scandal and we welcomed the Government decision to establish a compensation scheme over a year ago.
“But we are deeply concerned by the delays and various problems that have been raised around the scheme. We have already heard from many people who have experienced serious delays or have had very difficult experiences in applying for compensation, and the latest reports of concerns being raised by those working on the scheme are very troubling.
“It is immensely important that the huge injustices experienced by the Windrush generation at the hands of the UK Home Office are not compounded by problems in the Compensation Scheme that was supposed to right those wrongs. For that reason we are now calling for new evidence about the progress of the Compensation Scheme including its design and implementation and the support it has provided so far. We would encourage anyone who has an experience of the Windrush Compensation Scheme to submit evidence so that the Committee can assess what is happening on the scheme now.”
Terms of reference
The Committee invites written statements answering the questions set out below. Please note that statements do not need to address all of these questions:
Is the Home Office managing to “right the wrongs” experienced by the Windrush generation through this Compensation Scheme?
- Are you confident that the Windrush Compensation Scheme is fair?
- Is the level of compensation being offered by the Home Office adequate? If not, in which particular areas is it inadequate?
How good is the Home Office at sharing information about the Windrush Compensation Scheme? What could the Home Office do better to make sure people know about the scheme, and about the support that is available?
Do you, or does someone you know, have experience of contacting the Vulnerable Persons Team and/or the Windrush Help Team? If so, what did the team do well and what could they do to provide better support?
Do you, or does someone you know, have experience of interacting with the Home Office generally since the Windrush Compensation Scheme was established?
- If so have you noticed a change in the way the Home Office has responded to you?
- Do you believe the culture in the Home Office is changing?
Is it easy to use the scheme application forms and the accompanying guidance?
- Is it easy to get help with an application, if this is needed?
- If you or someone you know has had contact with the Home Office about an application, what was that contact like?
- How could the Home Office have communicated better about your application?
Are the Windrush Compensation Scheme rules and the guidance for caseworkers working well?
- Are people being compensated fairly under these rules for the losses they have suffered, such as –but not limited to- actual financial losses?
- If not, what changes would make the rules and guidance work better to give people fair compensation?
Is the review process working well? If not, what changes could make it work better?
What changes could make the Windrush Compensation Scheme as a whole, and/or the support in exceptional circumstances policy, work better for those affected by the Windrush scandal?
The Home Affairs Committee wants to hear your views. Find out how to submit evidence to this inquiry here. The deadline for submission is Wednesday 16 December.
Latest News from
Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
Human rights implications of long lockdown inquiry launched01/12/2020 15:33:00
In order to seek to control the impact of Covid-19, the Government has introduced successive restrictive measures, with varying degrees of severity, both nationally and locally.
Committee Chair Jeremy Hunt criticises failures that ‘make a mockery’ of NHS workforce planning01/12/2020 12:33:00
Health and Social Care Committee Chair Jeremy Hunt, has repeated his call for further information to ensure the NHS has a workforce with sufficient capacity, to meet requirements set out in its 10 year plan.
“Sorry saga” of disused nuclear sites will cost generations of UK taxpayer27/11/2020 15:10:00
Massive failed contracts, “weak” Government oversight and “perpetual” lack of knowledge of state of nuclear sites will cost “generations” of UK taxpayers dear.
Fix “dysfunctional” online ads market, Lords Committee report says27/11/2020 14:10:00
The Communications and Digital Committee publishes its report ‘Breaking news? The Future of UK Journalism’.
Agreements on spaceports and fisheries reported for special attention27/11/2020 13:10:00
The International Agreements Sub-Committee has today published a new report on three international agreements.
A Public Inquiry into the Government’s response to the Covid-19 pandemic published27/11/2020 09:33:00
The Committee undertook the inquiry, following the Government’s confirmation that an inquiry into the handling of the Covid-19 pandemic would take place, to investigate the options for its form and remit.
Committee seeks urgent Ministerial hearing to address Channel Tunnel concerns26/11/2020 15:33:00
In its latest report, the European Scrutiny Committee reiterates outstanding questions over plans for Channel Tunnel safety procedures after the end of the post-Brexit transition period; and requests an urgent hearing with the Minister responsible.
Committee launches inquiry into role of Catapults in delivering R&D Roadmap26/11/2020 14:38:00
The House of Lords Science and Technology Committee launches an inquiry into the contribution of the UK’s innovation Catapults to delivering the UK’s Research and Development Roadmap.
Government “lost a crucial month” in “underprepared, slow” ventilators response26/11/2020 11:38:00
Between March and early August 2020, in response to the Covid-19 pandemic, the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) and Cabinet Office secured an additional 26,000 mechanical ventilators for use across the NHS, at a total cost of £569 million.