WiredGov Newswire (news from other organisations)
Ofqual - Reviewing inter-subject comparability
Considering inter-subject comparability for science and language A levels.
Subject experts have a shared concern that A level entries in French, German and Spanish and physics, chemistry and biology could be suppressed if students and teachers believe it is harder to achieve top grades in these subjects compared to others. Ofqual has examined these concerns, as well as a wide-range of other evidence, as part of a comprehensive programme of research it has undertaken into inter-subject comparability spanning the past 3 years. This has involved engaging the broadest possible range of interested parties, including Ofqual’s Board and Standards Advisory Group, higher education, subject experts, teachers and students.
We are today (Wednesday 21 November) publishing our decision not to adjust grading standards in these A level subjects, based on all the evidence. However, we recognise that perceived grading severity undermines confidence. Therefore, we have committed to working with the exam boards to ensure that these subjects do not become statistically more severely graded in the future.
After analysing an extensive base of statistical evidence and contextual data, and having considered a wide range of other evidence, including detailed representations from the subject communities, we have concluded that there is not a uniformly compelling case to adjust grading standards in these subjects.
However, we recognise stakeholders have concerns about the impact that the perception of grading severity may be having on take-up of these subjects; and in particular, acknowledge their concerns over the falling numbers studying modern foreign languages. Although we did not conclude that changing grading standards for the qualifications is justified, we will consider with exam boards how we should act to avoid the potential for these subjects to become statistically more difficult in the future. We will implement and review this as part of our normal approach to awarding.
Commenting on the decision, Dr Michelle Meadows, Executive Director Strategy, Risk and Research, said:
Public perceptions of the difficulty of these subjects is longstanding. However, adjusting grading standards is something we would only consider if there were a uniformly compelling case to do so. We have carefully considered the arguments of stakeholders and closely examined a broad range of evidence against our criteria. We have concluded there is no such uniformly compelling case to adjust grading standards in these subjects.
Tom Bramley, Director, Research Division, Cambridge Assessment, said:
Ofqual have thoroughly investigated this question from a range of angles, recognising that statistical evidence about the difficulty of different subjects is rarely conclusive and can contradict other legitimate sources of evidence. Much of the concern about subject difficulty appears to be about the declining take-up of certain subjects. In my view lowering the grade boundaries is not the right way to make subjects more attractive to potential students.
Barnaby Lenon, chair of the Independent Schools Council, said:
It is to their credit that Ofqual has committed so much time to researching the thorny question of ‘are some subjects harder than others and if so what can be done about it?’ They conclude that adjusting grades is not the best option. Dumbing-down A level science grades, for example, could lead to students being taken onto degree courses for which they are not equipped.
Following considerable discussion with the teaching community, higher education and subject associations about the perceived difficulty and potential grading severity of certain subjects, we considered the relative difficulty of 3 science (physics, chemistry and biology) and 3 modern foreign language (French, German and Spanish) subjects.
In looking at these A level subjects, we were building on a significant body of research first begun in 2015 to consider this complex issue. This included looking internationally at how other educational jurisdictions seek to achieve inter-subject comparability, and studies which examined some of the statistical models which attempt to measure the relative difficulty of different subjects. This work also took place in the context of a small adjustment we made to grading standards in French, German and Spanish A levels in 2017 to reflect research into the impact of native speakers taking these qualifications.
We considered an extensive evidence base including statistical measures of subject difficulty and stakeholder concerns (including responses from subject associations, exam boards and their senior examiners for these subjects, and representatives from HE institutions, including those directly responsible for teaching first year undergraduates). We also looked at contextual data (such as data on teacher supply, trends in A level entry and research into the motivations behind students’ subject choices).
We judged the evidence against 4 criteria, which we applied to determine whether there was a ‘compelling case’ to adjust the established grade standards in a subject. The criteria were:
- statistical measures of subject difficulty show evidence of persistent grading severity over several years
- persuasive evidence of the potential detrimental impact caused by severe grading on those who use the qualification, and on society at large, over several years
- evidence which shows that those who use the qualification and those responsible for maintaining the grading standard judge an adjustment to be acceptable
- likely benefit to users of the qualification and society as a whole from a change to grading standards must outweigh any potential negative effects
Our research included asking students about the things that influence their decisions about what to study. The evidence shows that perceptions of difficulty were not the most important factor for students, who considered enjoyment and perceived usefulness of the subject to be more so.
Our decisions document and reports provide further detail on the 6 A level subjects against these 4 criteria. We did not find sufficiently strong evidence under these criteria to support an adjustment to grading standards.
We will now look at the evidence for a potential adjustment to grading standards in GCSE French, German and Spanish. We committed to expand our work on inter-subject comparability to include GCSE languages earlier this year, in light of concerns from some stakeholders that the legacy qualifications were more severely graded than other subjects.
Latest News from
WiredGov Newswire (news from other organisations)
FRC: Risk Coalition opens consultation on risk guidance17/07/2019 10:43:00
The Risk Coalition has recently opened a consultation on the principles and guidance for board risk committees and risk functions in the UK financial services sector.
UK company statistics: 2018 to 201917/07/2019 09:25:00
Our annual statistical release provides information about the number of companies on the register, newly incorporated companies, and removals from the register.
UK Space Agency: On 50th anniversary of Apollo 11 launch, UK and NASA state intent to work on future Moon missions16/07/2019 17:02:00
The UK and US space agencies have signed a statement of intent, which paves the way for UK commercial satellite communication and navigation services to be used by future NASA missions to the Moon.
LGA responds to introduction of Domestic Abuse Bill to Parliament16/07/2019 15:40:00
Cllr Simon Blackburn, Chair of the Local Government Association’s Safer and Stronger Communities Board, responded to the introduction of the Domestic Abuse Bill to Parliament today
LGA responds to Coram family and childcare's annual survey on holiday childcare16/07/2019 13:40:00
Cllr Anntoinette Bramble, Chair of the Local Government Association’s Children and Young People Board, responded to Coram Family and Childcare’s annual survey on holiday childcare, which found families are charged double the cost of term time childcare during summer holidays
TUC: Public servants need pension certainty16/07/2019 13:05:00
TUC Deputy General Secretary Paul Nowak yesterday responded to the government’s written statement on the Supreme Court decision to deny it permission to appeal the McCloud and Sargent judgement.
Government action urgently needed to protect consumers during the decarbonisation of heating, says Citizens Advice16/07/2019 12:40:00
The lack of a credible plan to decarbonise the way homes and businesses are heated risks failing consumers and undermining public confidence, according to Citizens Advice.
LGA responds to new legal duty to tackle serious violent crime16/07/2019 11:40:00
Cllr Simon Blackburn, Chair of the Local Government Association’s Safer and Stronger Communities Board, responded to the Government’s response to its consultation on a new legal duty to tackle serious violence
The CIPD welcomes consultation on sexual harassment at work and calls for stronger enforcement of existing legislation16/07/2019 10:40:00
The CIPD has responded to the Government’s consultation on sexual harassment in the workplace
LGA - Obesity crisis: Type 2 diabetes in children up by nearly half in five years16/07/2019 09:40:00
The number of children and young people being treated for Type 2 diabetes, a condition normally seen only in older adults and often linked to obesity, has rocketed by nearly 50 per cent in just five years, new analysis by the Local Government Association has revealed.