Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
PAC “not convinced by rationale” for opaque and “not impartial” Towns Fund selections
The £3.6 billion Towns Fund was introduced at pace by the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) in summer 2019. Ministers selected towns to receive funding from a ranked list prepared by officials.
- Read the report summary
- Read the conclusions and recommendations
- Read the full report
- Read the full report (PDF)
MHCLG claims it had good reasons for this approach, but in a report published yesterday, Wednesday 11 November 2020, the Public Accounts Committee says it is “not convinced by the rationales for selecting some towns and not others”, finding the justification offered by ministers for selecting individual towns to be “vague and based on sweeping assumptions” and raising concerns over the decisions being politically motivated.
In some cases, towns were chosen by ministers despite being identified by officials as the very lowest priority - for example, one town selected ranked 535th out of 541 towns.
Lack of transparency
MHCLG has also not been open about the process it followed and would not disclose the reasoning for selecting or excluding towns. This lack of transparency has fuelled accusations of political bias in the selection process, and is a risk to the Civil Service’s reputation for integrity and impartiality.
Although the Department’s Permanent Secretary confirmed he was satisfied the selection process met the requirements of propriety and regularity, a summary of the Accounting Officer assessment provided to the Committee - which sets out compliance with the legal framework for managing public money - remains unpublished, and the Committee is asking to be provided with the full version of the assessment.
MHCLG says that it wanted to give money to towns which it deemed unlikely to have the expertise to succeed at bidding for funding through an open competition; which also raises concerns about whether those towns will have the capacity to spend the money well.
The impact of Covid-19
The impact of Covid-19 means that some towns will likely need to reconsider how best to spend the money, and that financially stretched towns will find it even harder to come up with match funding.
It is still far from clear what impact MHCLG expects from the Towns Fund, when it expects to see the benefits, and how it will measure success both at the town level and across the whole programme. With much remaining unclear about how the programme will be delivered or how MHCLG will oversee progress, the Committee will keep a watching brief on the scheme and expects regular updates to hold Government to account for how it has used taxpayers’ money in the Towns Fund.
Meg Hillier MP, Chair of the Committee, yesterday said:
“In our programme of work on the Government response to the Covid pandemic, we have begun to see the grim, potentially huge costs of public spending made in haste and without all the usual, legal checks and controls. That makes it all the less acceptable to now be looking at billions of pounds handed out in an opaque process that has every appearance of having been politically motivated - long before Covid struck.
“Now, when every penny counts, and when some towns that won funding will almost certainly have to redirect it to fill the massive holes the pandemic has blown in their budgets, MHCLG must be open and transparent about the decisions it made to hand out those £billions of taxpayers’ money, and what it expects to deliver.”
Latest News from
Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
European Statutory Instruments Committee publishes Ninth report14/01/2022 15:33:00
Following the Committee's meeting on Tuesday 11 January, its ninth report of Session 2021-22 has been published.
Public funding for cricket must depend on progress to tackle racism14/01/2022 11:38:00
The Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee’s Report into racism in cricket urges the Government to limit public funding for the game unless there is demonstrable progress on ridding racist behaviour from clubs and among spectators.
Committee on Standards releases a report on the conduct of Daniel Kawczynski MP14/01/2022 10:15:00
This report arises from an investigation by the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards into Mr Kawczynski’s conduct, following a complaint from the Chair of the Independent Expert Panel (IEP).
Central bank digital currencies: a solution in search of a problem? Report published13/01/2022 16:20:00
The Economic Affairs Committee has published its report, ‘Central bank digital currencies: a solution in search of a problem?’
‘Chemical cocktail’ of sewage, slurry and plastic polluting English rivers puts public health and nature at risk13/01/2022 13:33:00
Poor water quality in English rivers is a result of chronic underinvestment and multiple failures in monitoring, governance and enforcement, the Environmental Audit Committee warns.
DEFRA’s plan for post-EU land and farming subsidies based on “blind optimism”11/01/2022 11:25:00
Plans for the scheme to replace the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy depend on changes in land use that bring both increased farm productivity and environmental benefits, but in a report published yesterday the Public Accounts Committee says Defra itself concedes “its confidence in the scheme looks like blind optimism”.
Housing crisis needs action on planning, SMEs and housing for elderly, says Lords report10/01/2022 14:20:00
The Built Environment Committee has published its report, ‘Meeting housing demand’, which concludes that the Government must address barriers to building much needed new homes.
MPs to examine how culture can engineer the levelling up agenda07/01/2022 14:25:00
The role that culture might play in delivering a Government commitment to level up the country is the focus of a new inquiry launched today, Reimagining where we live: cultural placemaking and the levelling up agenda.
Work and Pensions Committee publishes Government response to report20/12/2021 12:20:00
The Work and Pensions Committee recently (18 December 2021) published the DWP’s response to its report on the Government’s approach to ensuring pension funds consider the risks posed by climate change and the role schemes can play in meeting emission reduction targets.