Parliament advocates a centralised EU asylum system and legal ways to migrate
A centralised asylum system would allow the EU to better manage flows of migrants and asylum seekers, said the European Parliament on Tuesday. It also asked for safe and legal ways to be found for third country nationals to enter the Union without resorting to human smugglers at the risk of their lives.
In a non-binding resolution, MEPs acknowledge the failure of the EU asylum system to cope with ever-rising numbers of migrant arrivals and call for a radical overhaul of the so-called Dublin rules. They propose establishing a central system for collecting and allocating asylum applications. The scheme, which could include a quota for each EU member state, would work on the basis of “hotspots” from which refugees would be distributed.
The European Commission is currently considering a revision of the Dublin III Regulation (which determines which member state is responsible for processing which asylum application) and has pledged to present a legislative proposal before the summer.
“There is no quick fix for migration, no magic silver bullet. We do not need more emergency solutions, we need a sustainable approach for the future”, said Ms Metsola during the plenary debate.
"Migration should not be combatted, it should be managed”, added Ms Kyenge, insisting that the European approach should be based on solidarity and responsibility sharing.
Parliament underlines that the current asylum system does not take proper account of the particular migratory pressures faced by member states with EU external borders. MEPs demand changes to ensure fairness and shared responsibility, solidarity and swift processing of applications.
Relocation and resettlement
The text calls on member states to fulfil their obligations with regard to urgent relocation measures, stressing that so far, only a minimal part of the 106,000 asylum seekers awaiting reassignment from Italy and Greece to other EU countries had actually been relocated. On resettlement, MEPs insist that the EU needs a “binding and mandatory legislative approach”.
MEPs demand new EU-wide “readmission” (return) agreements which they say should take precedence over bilateral ones between member states and third countries. They insist that migrants should be returned only if the country to which they are being returned to is safe for them.
Latest News from
Politics and society have a shared responsibility to combat youth radicalisation11/12/2017 16:05:00
Despite a number of high-quality EU and Member State initiatives & measures, not enough is being done to successfully prevent young people from succumbing to the lure of violent extremism, the EESC says.
Update on MiFID II registers from 3 January 201811/12/2017 15:10:00
ESMA will provide updated Registers information in line with requirements under MIFIR/MiFID II.
Antitrust: International Skating Union's restrictive penalties on athletes breach EU competition rules11/12/2017 14:25:00
The EC has decided that International Skating Union (ISU) rules imposing severe penalties on athletes participating in speed skating competitions that are not authorised by the ISU are in breach of EU antitrust law. The ISU must now change these rules.
EU and Japan finalise Economic Partnership Agreement11/12/2017 13:10:00
Trade Commissioner Cecilia Malmström and Japanese Foreign Minister Taro Kono have announced the successful conclusion of the final discussions on the EU-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA).