National Audit Office Press Releases
Personalised commissioning in adult social care
The Department of Health now needs to gain a better understanding of the different ways to commission personalised services for users, and how these lead to improvements in user outcomes.
“Giving users more choice and control over their care through personal budgets and direct payments can improve their quality of life, but much of the positive evidence for personalised commissioning of adult care services is old. The Department now needs to gain a better understanding of the different ways to commission personalised services for users, and how these lead to improvements in user outcomes.”
Amyas Morse, head of the National Audit Office, 3 March 2016
Commissioning adult social care services through personal budgets and direct payments is an important way of giving care users more choice and control over their services. When implemented well they improve users’ quality of life. The Department of Health, however, requires a deeper understanding of the best ways to implement personalised commissioning, according to the National Audit Office.
Local authorities spent £6.3 billion on long-term community care in 2014-15. Around 500,000 adults in England received personal budgets in 2014-15, varying between 10% and 100% of users across authorities. The Care Act made personal budgets mandatory for all eligible users from April 2015. Much of the positive evidence for personalising commissioning, however, is old or relates to subgroups of users. The NAO believes there is a strong case for better use of existing surveys and evidence gathering, so the Department and its national partners understand the relationship between the different ways to commission personalised services for users, and improvements in user outcomes. The Department is extending personal budgets in healthcare and has an ambition that between 50,000 and 100,000 people will have a personal health budget by 2020.
The NAO found that some authorities have transformed their care and support processes to ration their resources fairly, share information about a broad range of local services, and monitor and manage spending on personal budgets efficiently, while others are finding personalising commissioning a challenge as they seek to save money, and are constrained in how they can personalise care by the need to reduce overall spending.
There are circumstances under which personalised commissioning can reduce the costs of care. For example, around 120,000 users with direct payments employ personal assistants to provide personal care, which is generally a cheaper option than homecare. The Care Act guidance, however, acknowledges that responding to users’ needs and their desired outcomes can increase the cost of care. The NAO also found that some authorities are struggling to manage and support their local care markets as well as we would expect of a well-functioning public service market.
The Department expects the value-for-money of personalised commissioning to come from improved outcomes for users, not necessarily from savings, which differs from local authorities’ expectations that savings can be made by personalising care. The Department’s monitoring regime does not enable it to fully understand how personal budgets and direct payments improve outcomes. In addition, the Department has not investigated how services can be personalised when money is tight. It is not clear whether local authorities will achieve the spending reductions they have forecast without putting user outcomes at risk.
Latest News from
National Audit Office Press Releases
NHS backlogs and waiting times in England02/12/2021 14:15:00
Recovering elective and cancer care performance to the standards required will be a huge and lengthy challenge for the NHS, and there is a real risk that the waiting list for patients seeking elective care will be longer in 2025 than it is today, according to analysis from the National Audit Office (NAO).
Employment support: The Kickstart Scheme29/11/2021 14:15:00
Kickstart is a large scale intervention, designed at speed to prevent a significant rise in youth unemployment and the long term “scarring” effect this can have on young people’s life chances.
Financial sustainability of schools in England26/11/2021 14:15:00
The National Audit Office (NAO) has found that the financial health of the mainstream school system has held up well in recent years despite funding and cost pressures.
The government’s preparedness for the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons for government on risk management22/11/2021 11:15:00
The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the UK’s vulnerability to an emergency that affects the whole of government, society and the economy, and the need to strengthen national resilience to prepare for future risks of this scale, according to the National Audit Office (NAO).
Managing tax debt through the pandemic17/11/2021 12:33:00
Tax debt is more than double pre-pandemic levels, and current staffing at HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) is unlikely to be enough to manage the increased tax debt workload, according to the National Audit Office (NAO).
133 years for drug dealing crime group who planned to torture an 82-year-old Manchester businessman12/11/2021 16:05:00
Six men have been jailed for a total of 133 years after a National Crime Agency investigation uncovered their role in the supply of cocaine and a separate plot to torture and rob a Manchester man.
The UK border: Post UK-EU transition period08/11/2021 14:15:00
A report by the National Audit Office (NAO) has found that while the government was able to deliver an initial operating capability at the GB-EU border by the end of the transition period, much more work is needed to bring in import controls, reduce the burden on traders, and resolve the position for Northern Ireland.
HM Revenue & Customs 2020-21 Accounts05/11/2021 12:25:00
Total tax revenue fell by 4.4% in 2020-2021 because of the COVID-19 pandemic according to the National Audit Office (NAO).
Investigation into supply chain finance in the NHS01/11/2021 14:15:00
Two schemes offered by Greensill Capital – an early payment scheme to community pharmacies and salary advances to employees of NHS Trusts – did not receive the expected uptake and offered no material benefits to the NHS, according to the National Audit Office (NAO).