Planning reforms not the 'radical shake-up' some expected, says IEA expert
Dr Kristian Niemietz, Head of Political Economy at the Institute of Economic Affairs, responded to the government’s planning proposals
“The announced planning reforms are a step in the right direction. But they are not the ‘radical shake-up’ some were expecting.
“The basic idea is to make the planning system less discretionary, and more rules-based. Rather than haggling over every individual planning application, it will be decided in advance where development will be allowed, where it will not be, and where it might be. This will include the creation of development zones, where planning applications will be fast-tracked, and where there is an automatic presumption in favour of development.
“So far, so good. Fears that this will erode standards, or lead to the creation of ‘slum housing’, are unfounded. Zoning codes, under which planning permission is more or less automatically granted in some places, have existed for a long time in other developed countries, and they have not led to anything of the sort. There is nothing ‘radical’ about this: it is a perfectly conventional planning tool.
“The danger is not that the new system will be too permissive. The danger is that it might not make that much difference, in practice. It remains to be seen how extensive these new development zones will be. How many of them will be created? Will they be in places where housing demand is highest?
“It also remains to be seen how pro-development they really will be. What happens if local councils, under pressure from already well-housed NIMBYs and obstructionists, continue to drag their feet, as they do now?
“And this is before we get to the fact that the government has foolishly ruled out reviewing green belt boundaries. As a result, vast swathes of agricultural land in areas of high housing demand, most of which could be easily developed, and much of which has neither a high environmental nor a high scenic value, will remain off-limits to development.”
Notes to editors
For media enquiries, please contact Emily Carver, Media Manager, 07715942731
Dr Kristian Niemietz is available for further comment.
For additional IEA reading on planning reform: Raising the Roof
The mission of the Institute of Economic Affairs is to improve understanding of the fundamental institutions of a free society by analysing and expounding the role of markets in solving economic and social problems. The IEA is a registered educational charity and independent of all political parties.
Latest News from
IFS - Larger funding cuts for schools in poor areas leave them badly placed to deal with COVID-19 challenges22/09/2020 09:35:00
Schools serving more deprived pupils face major challenges over the next few years. Educational inequalities will have widened during lockdown. Planned increases in teacher starting salaries will also weigh more heavily on such schools, given they are more likely to employ new teachers.
IFG - Disputes over Brexit increase the need to strengthen the Sewel convention17/09/2020 10:35:00
A new Institute for Government paper says the future of the Union could be put at risk without reforms to the principle of legislative consent which lies at the heart of the devolution settlement.
IFS - Large variation in earnings returns among postgraduate degrees, with returns of more than 15% for masters in business and law, but negative returns for many arts and humanities courses17/09/2020 09:35:00
Women with a masters degree earn considerably more at age 35 than those with only an undergraduate degree, with average earnings of £35,400, compared with £32,500 for those who do not go beyond undergraduate level. For men, the differences are even larger: masters graduates earn £55,800 on average, £5,000 more than those with only an undergraduate degree.
IFS - The long shadow of deprivation: Differences in opportunities across England15/09/2020 15:20:00
A socially mobile country provides equal opportunities for everyone, across big cities and small towns, and regardless of whether your parents are rich or poor. This report makes use of newly linked administrative data on all state-educated pupils born between 1986 and 1988 to follow a group of sons from where they grew up, looking at their family circumstances and their educational achievement, through to the labour market.
IPPR welcomes furlough reform plan proposed by Labour at TUC Conference15/09/2020 14:20:00
The think tank had previously called for such a scheme to prevent mass unemployment by encouraging part-time working
Labour market deterioration “not (yet) as bad as feared”, says IEA expert15/09/2020 12:35:00
IEA Economics Fellow Julian Jessop responded to the latest unemployment statistics published by the Office for National Statistics (ONS)
JRF - Targeted furlough scheme needed as new research shows who is likely to lose their job15/09/2020 11:35:00
A new Pre-Vaccine Jobs Risk Index produced for JRF shows that sectors such as hospitality, retail and beauty, which rely on close contact with members of the public but are not within the sphere of health, care or essential services are likely to be hit hardest by coronavirus until a vaccine is found.
IFG - Deal or no deal, the government should adopt its own state aid regime15/09/2020 10:35:00
The UK would benefit from a strong ‘state aid’ system whether or not it strikes a trade deal with the EU, says a new report from the Institute for Government.
Demos - New research finds social fractures caused by Covid-19 are more divisive than Brexit15/09/2020 09:35:00
New research from the cross-party think tank Demos has found that Covid-19 has now caused deeper social fractures than Brexit. The poll finds that over half of mask wearers in Britain (58%) have severely negative attitudes towards non-mask wearers, and the vast majority (68%) of people who did not break lockdown rules have strong negative views about lockdown rule breakers.