Policy Exchange - Immigration After Brexit
A post-Brexit immigration system should clamp down on low-skilled EU immigration but adopt a lighter-touch approach for students and professionals, argues Policy Exchange’s Head of Demography, Immigration and Integration, David Goodhart, in a new paper Immigration After Brexit.
As Britain considers its long-term immigration needs, there is scope to maintain a high level of continuity for groups such as EU students and tourists. There should be a customised “light touch” work permit system for EU professionals and — as Britain weans itself off low-skilled migration — there should be priority for low skilled workers ready to work antisocial hours, thereby acting more as complements than direct competitors to the British workforce. The paper argues that:
- To deliver on Brexit, future immigration policy must bear down on low-skilled migration.
- Openness and continuity should prevail in other areas. Visa-free travel should continue for short visits from the EU and conditions should remain broadly the same for tourists and students – including the same tuition fee arrangements for EU as for UK students.
- Three new temporary channels should be opened up: the Youth Mobility Scheme which allows 18- to 30-year-olds from countries like Australia and New Zealand to work in the UK for two years should be extended to young EU citizens; the Seasonal Agricultural Workers Scheme should be revived for agriculture and horticulture; and the intra-company transfer scheme should be extended to EU companies.
- The Migration Advisory Committee should work with industries that have become heavily dependent on low-skilled EU workers to help manage the transition to lower dependence.
- Businesses which slashed their training budgets for domestic workers when Eastern European labour became available in the mid-2000s should prioritise the development of domestic talent.
- EU citizens coming to the UK for employment should in future need work permits, with a presumption of five years for professionals and two years for low-skilled workers. Low-skilled workers ready to apply for “antisocial hours visas” should be given priority.
- Under a special “light touch” employer-led work permit scheme for EU professionals, the Home Office should guarantee to approve such permits in less than a month.
- As a gesture of goodwill, EU citizens coming to the UK for an extended period in the future should qualify for social rights earlier than non-EU citizens, who must wait five years. This should be reviewed as the UK considers its future immigration policy as it ‘pivots to the world’.
- The Home Office must invest more in hiring extra staff at Border Force and UK Visas and Immigration in order to deal with the greater workload of processing more work permits.
David Goodhart said:
“A Brexit without a clear end to free movement in its current form is neither possible nor desirable as it was clearly one of the biggest single factors behind the Brexit vote.
“One of the problems with freedom of movement is that it has created a new category of resident: someone who is neither a temporary visitor, such as a tourist, nor someone who is making a permanent commitment to a new country in the manner of the traditional immigrant. Many of those taking advantage of free movement in recent years have enjoyed the rights of the latter with the attitude of the former.
“Whilst we welcome an end to freedom of movement, a good post-Brexit immigration deal should maintain a lot of continuity in the movement of people, especially for students and professionals, and we can open up several new temporary work routes. There’s no reason for arrangements to change around tourists and students from the EU, but we do need to see a general reduction in the number of low skilled workers.
“The Government, in partnership with industry and the Migration Advisory Committee, needs to set out how they will gradually reduce low skilled immigration from the EU, whilst maintaining a route for workers coming to do jobs with antisocial hours.”
Latest News from
Bank of England wrong to continue policy of quantitative easing, says IEA expert24/09/2021 10:15:00
Jessop, Economics Fellow at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA), commented on the Bank of England’s decision to continue its policy of quantitative easing Julian
The pandemic has further opened up deep health inequalities: The King’s Fund responds to new life expectancy data for 2020 from the Office for National Statistics (ONS)24/09/2021 09:15:00
Dr Veena Raleigh, Senior Fellow at The King’s Fund, commented on the 2020 life expectancy data released by the ONS yesterday
The UK should introduce a British innovation principle, says new IEA research23/09/2021 13:15:00
The UK should introduce a British innovation principe, says new IEA research
JRF - What does a “very difficult winter” look like for low-income families?23/09/2021 12:15:00
New analysis on the planned £20-a-week cut to Universal Credit and the rising cost of living.
Tax bumper pandemic profits to kickstart a fairer and stronger post-crisis economy, says IPPR22/09/2021 14:20:00
In a major publication ahead of the party conferences of the two main parties, the IPPR think tank has set out a vision for the economic recovery that rebalances power and spreads prosperity across the country.
IFS - Response to the latest ONS public sector finances data22/09/2021 10:05:00
Isabel Stockton, Research Economist at the Institute for Fiscal Studies responded to the latest ONS public sector finances data
IEA expert responds to ONS public sector finance figures22/09/2021 09:05:00
Julian Jessop, Economics Fellow at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, responded to ONS public sector finance figures for August 2021
IFS - No jobseeker’s paradise: vacancies above pre-pandemic levels, but only in low-paid occupations, and competition for jobs is still higher than pre-pandemic for most21/09/2021 12:20:00
Despite overall job vacancies climbing above pre-pandemic levels