Policy Exchange teams up with King’s College London on major new study on how to tackle air pollution in the Capital
Two of the leading research organisations in the country today announced a partnership to produce a major new study into policies to improve air quality in London.
Policy Exchange, the UK’s leading think tank, which has a track record of producing ideas that have impacted the policy debate, will join forces with King’s College London’s Environmental Research Group, one of the global experts in air quality science.
The ground breaking study is being supported by the Trust for London, the Liebreich Foundation, and the City of London Corporation.
Air pollution is a significant issue in London, leading to the premature deaths of thousands of residents each year, particularly in poorer areas. London has failed to meet air quality targets, and the Supreme Court has given the government until the end of the year to work up a plan to improve the situation. This study, to be carried out over the next few months, will provide independent estimates of likely air pollution levels once current policies are implemented, and identify what additional steps are required in order for London to meet legal air quality limits. This work builds on a previous Policy Exchange report Something in the Air: the forgotten crisis of Britain’s poor air quality.
Richard Howard, head of environment and energy at Policy Exchange, said:
“Air pollution causes the premature death of thousands of Londoners each year. The Mayor is taking steps to improve air quality, for example through the introduction of an Ultra Low Emissions Zone, but we still don’t fully understand the impact of planned policies, or whether they will be sufficient to tackle air pollution. Our study will identify and compare possible solutions to improving air quality in London, for example, shifting towards low emission buses and taxis.”
Frank Kelly, Professor of Environmental Health and Director of the Environmental Research Group at King’s College London said:
“We welcome the opportunity to work with Policy Exchange and the parties funding this important work. Solving London’s air pollution problems is not going to be easy but this research will help clarify the range of policy options available as well as their likely impacts on improving air quality. With this information available in the public domain it will facilitate an open, wide ranging discussion, about the best way forward.”
Mubin Haq, Director of Policy and Grants at Trust for London, said:
"Each Londoner loses on average nine months of their life as a result of the dirty air we breathe. It affects all Londoners but particularly the poorest. Children living in the worst streets in the capital for air quality are nearly 50% more likely to be eligible for free school meals than the London average.
"Whether the proposed measures, including the Mayor's ultra low emission zone are sufficient, even if London's population did not grow, is unclear. But with an increase of around one million people over the next decade, the changes needed require a new scale and urgency. Sixty years ago the Clean Air Act revolutionised how we dealt with dirty air because 4,000 Londoners died in the Great Smog of 1952. With a similar number of deaths each year in the capital because the air isn't clean enough, we are supporting this research to assess what action will make a difference."
Wendy Mead, Chairman of the City of London Corporation’s Environment Committee, said:
“The UK has been breaching legal limits for nitrogen dioxide for the past five years, with particularly serious consequences in London, which suffers from the worst air pollution in the country. As the authority for the capital’s business district and a major London public services provider, we strongly support pollution reduction plans.
“This study will help policymakers to gain a greater understanding the impact of the reform proposals currently on the table, and the type of action that will be required if we are to meet the air quality limit values in the shortest possible time.”
Notes to editors:
- As part of this study, King’s College London will produce new analysis and projections of air pollution and air quality levels to 2025 under a range of policy scenarios, using the well-established London Air Quality Toolkit model. We will also calculate the health impacts associated with air pollution, as well as investigating the link between air pollution and wider deprivation in London.
- The study will commence in July 2015 and will produce reports in September and December 2015.
- Trust for London is the largest independent charitable foundation funding work which tackles poverty and inequality in the capital. Each year it provides around £7 million in grants and at any one point is supporting some 400 voluntary organisations. It made a grant of £79,000 to Policy Exchange and Kings College London towards research providing an independent evidence base and recommendations on the most effective policies to improve air quality in London.
- The City of London Corporation is the governing authority for the City of London and a major public services provider across the capital. It has three roles (i) supporting London’s communities by working in partnership with the capital’s boroughs on economic regeneration and skills projects (ii) looking after London culture and green spaces, including Museum of London, Barbican Arts Centre, Tower Bridge, Hampstead Heath, Epping Forest, and Burnham Beeches, and (iii) supporting and promoting the ‘City’ as a world-leading financial and business centre.
Latest News from
IPPR - State should tackle the growth of debt-fuelled private firms providing social care, says think tank19/09/2019 16:35:00
IPPR calls for the state to build and operate new residential care homes, and establish new financial regulator to oversee private providers
IFS - Big new money for schools and FE, but FE spending still over 7% down on 2010 while no growth in school spending per pupil for 13 years19/09/2019 15:35:00
The extra £4.3 billion just committed for schools in England by 2022 will just about reverse the cuts of 8% in spending per pupil since 2009. Even so, an effective 13-year real-terms freeze will still represent an unprecedented period without growth.
IEA: Early signs suggest minimum unit pricing is not having a positive effect on health19/09/2019 14:35:00
Christopher Snowdon responds to new research
JRF responds to Trussell Trust report on Universal Credit19/09/2019 13:35:00
Today, the Trussell Trust has published its new #5WeeksTooLong: why we need to end the wait for Universal Credit report. This new research shows that in areas where Universal Credit has been rolled out for at least a year, food banks in their network have seen a 30% increase in demand.
NIESR reacts to the latest ONS CPI inflation statistics19/09/2019 13:20:00
According to figures released yesterday by the ONS, consumer price index inflation decreased by 0.4 percentage points on the month to 1.7 per cent in the year to August 2019. Our new analysis of 129,762 locally-collected goods and services prices included in the index this month suggests that the slowing of inflation was widespread across the country, driven by fewer firms increasing prices.
NHS hospitals under strain over £80bn PFI bill for just £13bn of actual investment, finds IPPR19/09/2019 12:35:00
Safety hazards, sewage leaks and falling ceilings are major risks at hospitals after decades of underinvestment and the legacy of PFI
Our children need legal guarantees of a stable natural world to save them from a ‘toxic inheritance’, says IPPR19/09/2019 11:35:00
Future Generations Act and votes at 16 would help protect young and those yet to be born from environmental disaster
IEA: Lib Dems offer “illiberal concoction” of public spending and state intervention19/09/2019 10:35:00
Mark Littlewood responds to Jo Swinson's leader's speech
IPPR - Taxing income from wealth the same as income from work could raise £90 billion over five years, report finds19/09/2019 09:35:00
Ending special treatment for capital gains should be a first step in a radical overhaul of the UK’s unfair and outdated tax system, says IPPR
IFG - Government is guilty of repeated outsourcing failures – but Labour’s policy risks throwing away the successes17/09/2019 11:35:00
Labour’s policy of bringing public services back into government hands by default would be a mistake, argues a new report from the Institute for Government. But senior politicians have consistently overstated how much money is saved by outsourcing services.