Post-16 Skills Plan - A Monopoly on Qualifications?
Blog posted by: Michael Lemin, Thursday, 16 February 2017.
Following a review led by Lord Sainsbury, the government's Post-16 Skills Plan proposes overhauling technical education for 16-18 year olds. The unintended consequences of the policy could potentially cause more harm than good – here we look at the Plan in more detail.
The principles behind the reforms are admirable; aligning the skills system to needs of employers, eliminating 'low value' qualifications that are of little use to learners, and ensuring financial sustainability of the system. Unfortunately, as the policies emerge and are put into practice, there are serious concerns about the negative impact this could have on learners, educators and employers.
The plan proposes moving away from the current model, where colleges, schools and training providers have a choice of Awarding Organisation. The new system will mean skills training is divided into 15 ‘routes’ and a licence given to a single Awarding Organisation to deliver each part of the skills qualification system. The intention is to ensure that the system is more simple and consistent.
Unfortunately, one only has to look at Southern Rail as an example of what can happen when an organisation is awarded a monopoly. Customers (in these cases, colleges, schools and training providers) will not have the option to take their business elsewhere if they’re not happy with the product (qualification) or service offered.
Some Awarding Organisations may feel that the need to provide good customer service disappears in light of having no competition. I can see a situation where learners could find themselves waiting a long time to receive certificates from some Awarding Organisations. The incentive for Awarding Organisations to innovate and invest in developing qualifications for the emerging skills needs of our economy is taken away.
These factors are likely to have a hugely negative impact on skills provision, if not addressed. The problem is that there is such huge reform in the sector, and the skills system is very complex, evolved over decades of interventionist policy making.
It’s difficult for ministers or civil servants to pay due attention to perceived minor details in light of the scale of change. But it is these details that will determine the= success of their plans. The next few years are crucial; if we get it wrong, the results could be wholly detrimental. Employers could walk away; learners could lose confidence in the skills system.
It’s not all doom and gloom, however. It’s been genuinely exciting to see employers taking such an active part in the skills system in recent years. This will help to ensure that we create a system that gives people the skills that employers want. Apprenticeships are back in the limelight and learners are seriously considering them as a viable route in to employment, in light of rising university costs.
We need to build on this early success and work with the government to highlight the need for continued discussion and consideration of the finer details of emerging skills policy. From our unique vantage point, we’re excited about the potential positive impacts that reforms will bring to employers and learners, and we’ll continue to challenge emerging policy and constrictively suggest changes to ensure that the new system works for all.
Latest News from
Adapting to the new normal - supporting apprentices through COVID-1922/07/2020 11:15:00
COVID-19 has had a substantial impact on education in recent months.
Team Leader apprentice successfully completes end-point assessment with EPA Plus15/07/2020 14:33:00
Tony Rossiter has successfully completed end-point assessment for the Level 3 Team Leader/Supervisor apprenticeship standard.
Bold action from the Chancellor – but more is needed14/07/2020 09:15:00
Michael Lemin, Senior Policy Specialist at NCFE, unpacks the detail of the Chancellor’s economic statement, including the positive commitments made to youth employability and the questions that are, as yet, unanswered for the wider skills sector.
Revolutionary Forces discussion paper – top takeaways13/07/2020 09:20:00
In our recent discussion paper published in partnership with Campaign for Learning, a host of experts from across the FE, labour market economics, employment and mental health sectors explored the revolutionary forces facing the UK economy and what the Government needs to include in its post-16 white paper to ensure that as a sector, we’re prepared for the road ahead.
Adapting delivery methods following COVID-19 – what does the future hold?09/07/2020 09:15:00
Hear from Learning Curve Group as they take a look at the impact that COVID-19 has had on education and what this means for the future of the sector.
The FE sector needs the revolutionary post-16 white paper that has been promised now more than ever07/07/2020 15:43:00
A paper published yesterday by NCFE and our friends at Campaign for Learning is urging the Government to ensure that the plans outlined in the forthcoming post-16 white paper are sufficiently flexible to meet the immense changes facing the UK economy.
Adapting to the new normal - supporting learners01/07/2020 12:43:00
Due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a great deal of disruption to learning, the impact of which will be felt long into the next academic year and possibly beyond.
Adapting to the new normal - supporting staff01/07/2020 09:15:00
COVID-19 has had a substantial impact on education in recent months. While we may not understand the true extent of these changes on the future of the sector, it’s critical that we start forward planning, so you and your colleagues feel prepared and supported for what’s to come.
Vocational qualifications improve your learners’ employability skills29/06/2020 09:15:00
Ensuring young people leave their formal education ready for the workplace is a difficult task but one which providers have been challenged to deliver on as part of their careers education and commitment to employability skills.