Proposals for changes to driving disqualification guidelines published
Proposals to provide more guidance to courts in England and Wales for sentencing drivers who claim exceptional hardship when facing disqualification were launched yesterday in a public consultation by the Sentencing Council.
The proposals, which follow requests for more guidance from magistrates, also include minor changes to sentencing guidelines for driving while disqualified and breach of a community order.
The changes relate chiefly to sentencing in magistrates’ courts but may also affect sentencing in the Crown Court for breach of a community order. In addition, there are proposed clarifications to the explanatory materials provided to assist magistrates in sentencing.
The proposed new guidance covers ‘totting up’ disqualifications, which are imposed when an offender incurs 12 or more points on their licence. Drivers can avoid disqualification if they successfully claim that not being able to drive would lead to “exceptional hardship”.
The new guidance sets out clearly what the courts should have regard to when considering whether there are grounds to reduce or avoid a disqualification due to exceptional hardship:
- The test is not inconvenience or hardship, but exceptional hardship for which the court must have evidence – which may include the offender’s sworn evidence.
- Some hardship is likely to occur in many if not most orders of disqualification.
- Courts should be cautious before accepting assertions of exceptional hardship without evidence that alternatives (including alternative means of transport) for avoiding exceptional hardship are not viable.
- Loss of employment will not in itself necessarily amount to exceptional hardship; whether or not it does will depend on the circumstances of the offender and the consequences of that loss of employment on the offender and/or others.
- The more severe the hardship suffered by the offender and/or others as a result of the disqualification, the more likely it is to be exceptional.
Sentencing Council Chairman Lord Justice Holroyde said:
“Sentencing guidelines are used in magistrates’ courts throughout England and Wales on a daily basis and it is important that they provide clear guidance to court users.
“This consultation is in response to requests from magistrates for changes to provide more information and bring greater clarity to these guidelines. We are keen to hear views on the proposals from magistrates, others working in the criminal justice system and anyone else with an interest in sentencing.”
The consultation also includes proposals to:
- Clarify the guideline for driving while disqualified to make it clear that an existing disqualification period should be added to any new disqualification period imposed by the court so that both are served in full.
- Amend the guideline for sentencing offenders who have breached a community order, to make it clear that the order can be extended to allow time for completion of extra requirements (such as unpaid work) but not as a standalone punishment.
- Clarify that the order of priority for financial penalties is: compensation, surcharge, fine and lastly costs where an offender has insufficient resources to pay them all.
The consultation runs for 12 weeks from 22 January to 15 April 2020 and can be accessed via the Council’s website: https://www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/
Notes to editors
- ‘Totting up’ disqualifications are imposed when an offender incurs 12 or more points on their licence. Disqualification can be avoided or reduced in certain circumstances and the guidance being consulted on seeks to provide guidance to courts on when that may apply.
- Disqualification for a minimum period must be ordered if an offender incurs 12 or more penalty points within a three-year period – s.35 Road Traffic Offenders Act (RTOA) 1988.
- The minimum period is:
- six months if no previous disqualification is to be taken into account
- one year if one “relevant period of disqualification” is to be taken into account
- two years if more than one “relevant period of disqualification” is to be taken into account.
- A “relevant period of disqualification” is one which is:
- not less than 56 days; and
- imposed within the three years immediately preceding the date on which the current offence (or most recent of the current offences) was committed.
- The court must order the offender to be disqualified for not less than the minimum period unless the court is satisfied, having regard to all the circumstances, that there are grounds for mitigating the normal consequences of the conviction and thinks fit to order him to be disqualified for a shorter period or not to order him to be disqualified. (s.35(1) RTOA 1988)
- Where a ‘totting up’ disqualification is imposed, it erases all penalty points.
- Sentencing guidelines must be followed, unless the court is satisfied that it would be contrary to the interest of justice to do so. If a judge or magistrate believes that a guideline prevents the correct sentence from being given in an exceptional case, he or she can sentence outside of the guideline.
- The Sentencing Council was established by Parliament to be an independent body, but accountable to Parliament for its work which is scrutinised by the Justice Select Committee. Justice Ministers are accountable to Parliament for the Sentencing Council’s effectiveness and efficiency, for its use of public funds and for protecting its independence. Judicial Council members are appointed by the Lord Chief Justice with the agreement of the Lord Chancellor. Non-judicial council members are appointed by the Lord Chancellor with the agreement of the Lord Chief Justice.
For more information, please contact Kathryn Montague, Sentencing Council Press Office, on 020 7071 5792 / 5788 / 07912301657
Latest News from
Firearms offences – new guidelines come into force04/01/2021 11:05:00
New sentencing guidelines for firearms offences come into force on 1 January 2021
Publication of Theft from a shop or stall data18/12/2020 15:30:00
Yesterday, the Council has published data covering the factors taken into account when sentencing adult offenders for theft from a shop or stall, and details of the sentence imposed. We hope that users will find these datasets useful to conduct their own analysis. The publication can be found here.
Theft from a shop or stall: data release pre-announcement20/11/2020 16:25:00
The Council will be publishing data collected from magistrates’ courts covering the factors taken into account when sentencing adult offenders for theft from a shop or stall, (where this was the principal offence), on 17 December 2020.
Publication of an assessment of the 2017 update to the Magistrates’ Court Sentencing Guidelines30/03/2020 09:15:00
The Sentencing Council has published an assessment of the impact and implementation of the 2017 update to the Magistrates’ Court Sentencing Guidelines (MCSG).
Sentencing Council consults on future direction12/03/2020 12:25:00
The Sentencing Council has launched a public consultation to determine its future direction, balancing its priorities against limited resources. The consultation, which will run from 10 March to 9 June 2020, is seeking views on where the Council should focus its efforts in the next 10 years.
What next for the Sentencing Council?05/03/2020 10:25:00
April 2020 marks the 10th anniversary of the Sentencing Council.
Terrorism guidelines to be revised following legislation changes18/10/2019 16:15:00
Proposals for revisions to some of the current sentencing guidelines for terrorism offences in England and Wales were published for consultation today by the Sentencing Council, following significant legislative changes brought in by the new Counter Terrorism and Border Security Act 2019.
New sentencing guidelines for public order offences published17/10/2019 14:25:00
The Sentencing Council has published new guidelines to be used by judges and magistrates in England and Wales when sentencing offenders convicted of public order offences, following consultation.