Putting Users at The Heart of Change
Blog posted by: Penelope Gibbs, Director, Transform Justice, 28 June 2019.
Criminal lawyers are wary of the Government’s digital court reform programme. They and every other court user welcome digitisation of case files and better booking systems. But the programme also involves an expansion in the use of video hearings and of online court processes.
Video links from prisons to courts have been running for nearly 20 years but they have been expanded without any good research into their impact on users and on court outcomes. They are justified as saving money on prison transport and making court hearings more convenient for those in prison. They certainly do both, but do they really serve justice or the needs of the user – the defendant? Transform Justice surveyed magistrates, lawyers and court staff about video links. Most had grave concerns.
Lawyers complained that video links damaged the relationship between lawyer and client and sometimes destroyed trust - lawyers are forced to have private consultations with their clients on video. Sometimes, lawyers on video have less than 15 minutes to introduce themselves to a new client, to get the stressed client to reveal their background and any disabilities they might have, to discover as much as possible about the alleged offence, to advise the client whether to plead guilty or not guilty and to prepare them for the court hearing.
Not surprisingly, lawyers say defendants are short changed. Our interviewees also suggested that forcing defendants to go on video influences their behaviour for the worse - “many, or even most, defendants seem to feel disconnected from the court process when appearing via video-link. It’s almost as if they are being processed by a machine as opposed to humans.” Being on video, isolated from the court, defendants either disengage from the court process or become frustrated and end up being rude. Clearly angry, rude defendants may get worse outcomes.
The only UK study which monitored the outcomes of video hearings should have rung alarm bells. In 2010 the Government evaluated a pilot of magistrates’ court hearings where the defendant appeared from a room in a police station. Their lawyer, the judges and all others involved saw the defendant on video from the courtroom. In the pilot, the defendants who appeared on video were less likely to be represented by a lawyer, more likely to plead guilty and likely, if convicted, to get a higher prison sentence. It’s not clear whether this is correlation or causation, but if being on video does significantly change the court outcome for a defendant, we all need to know why.
Since 2014, HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has secured over a billion for their digital court reform programme, and in return the Treasury has committed them to a very tight timetable. This has prompted a leap to digital solutions – more video links, wholly virtual courts, online processes – without first having the information to properly analyse the problem. Last year HMCTS published a study on court users which showed that the most important driver of satisfaction was being “listened to” and that those who had gone in person to court were far more likely to feel “listened to” than those who had communicated with the court online or on the telephone. The digital court reform programme cannot and will not be reversed. But let’s slow it down a bit so we can assess how it impacts on access to justice, and ensure that it helps vulnerable people to get redress.
|Tweets by @reformthinktank|
Latest News from
Realising Smart Regulation in Healthcare24/09/2020 13:15:00
This event write up brings together the ideas generated at Reform and Imperial College London's policy hackathon 'Realising Smart Regulation in Healthcare'.
Powering The UK’s Approach to Antimicrobial Resistance18/09/2020 13:33:00
This report provides a critical assessment of the UK’s efforts to tackle the mounting global threat of Antimicrobial Resistance and proposes ideas for reform.
Reformer Thoughts: 'The Future of Post-Brexit Regulation'03/09/2020 14:05:00
This Reformer Thoughts discusses the steps the UK must take to deliver a dynamic and responsive regulatory system for medicines and medical devices post-Brexit.
Analysis of The Chancellor's Economic Statement09/07/2020 12:05:00
Blog posted by: Charlotte Pickles, 8 July 2020.
When Furlough Has to Stop: Next Steps to Avert Long-term Unemployment06/07/2020 16:38:00
This report sets out the scale of the jobs challenge facing the Government and details proposals to prevent unemployment.
Reformer Thoughts – Accelerating Innovation in Local Government21/05/2020 12:33:00
This Reformer Thoughts discusses how local government can drive innovation to create more effective, efficient, and accessible services.
Working Through it: Assessing State Employment Support Responses to The Coronavirus29/04/2020 12:33:00
The coronavirus has produced a one-in-a-generation economic challenge, threatening business and employment across every sector of the economy.
Reducing The Prison Population: Extending Home Detention Curfew And Scrapping Short Sentences23/03/2020 12:48:00
This Reform Perspectives assesses current Government policy to reduce overcrowding, why, while welcome, argues it is insufficient, and outlines what further changes should be made to immediately reduce the prison population.