RUSI Briefing says UK defence spending due to fall below NATO target of 2% of GDP in 2015
While the UK government has called upon European NATO members to meet the Alliance’s target for 2% of GDP to be spent on defence, the UK itself is currently on course to fall below this level in the fiscal year that begins in April 2015, according to a new RUSI Briefing Paper.
A new study for RUSI shows that – on current spending plans and growth projections – the UK’s defence budget (excluding spending on any new operations) is set to fall to an estimated 1.88% of GDP in financial year 2015/16. The finding comes amidst calls by the UK government at the Wales NATO Summit for all member states to meet the alliance’s target of spending at least 2% of GDP on defence.
The new RUSI Briefing Paper, authored by RUSI’s Director of Research and UK Defence Policy, Professor Malcolm Chalmers, shows that existing Ministry of Defence (MoD) planning assumptions (for modest real-terms growth in its budget after 2015/16) would also, in the context of projected GDP growth, see spending falling to around 1.7% of GDP by 2020/21.
Even this scenario may be over-optimistic because of wider government plans for spending cuts after 2015/16. Further cuts in the 2015 Spending Review (of between 4% and 10% in real terms over five years), Chalmers argues, could see defence spending falling further, to between 1.5% and 1.6% of GDP in 2020/21.
Given the risk of further such cuts, Chalmers argues that it would be in the Ministry of Defence’s interests to support the holding of the next Strategic Defence and Security Review in parallel with (rather than subsequent to) the 2015 Spending Review. This would help to ensure that government leaders (in both 10 and 11 Downing Street) are fully aware of the capability consequences of proposed spending cuts before they are finalised.
Because of the short time involved in such a schedule – perhaps only three months after the election before key capability choices need to be made – the MoD will need to complete much of the detailed work on the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of a range of possible policy options in advance of the May 2015 general election. Without such work, government ministers could find themselves – as in the last SDSR in 2010 – being forced to make key decisions without adequate supporting data.
To read ‘The Financial Context of the 2015 SDSR: The End of UK Exceptionalism?’ in full,download the briefing here (PDF)
NOTES FOR EDITORS
To contact or interview the author, Professor Malcolm Chalmers, RUSI Research Director:firstname.lastname@example.org or call: +44 (0) 78 2584 8197
If the author is not available, contact Adrian Johnson: +44 (0) 7917 373 068. For all other media inquiries, please contact: Saqeb Mueen / +44(0)20 7747 2618 / +44 (0) 7917 373 069 / email@example.com
The Royal United Services Institute is the UK’s leading independent think tank on international defence and security. Its mission is to be an analytical research-led global forum for informing, influencing and enhancing public debate on a safer and more stable world.
Latest News from
Reward farmers who help fight climate and nature crisis, urges IPPR think tank13/05/2021 14:35:00
Now the UK has left the EU’s agricultural schemes, the government should seize the opportunity to transform farming to protect the environment and secure the livelihoods of farmers, according to a new IPPR report.
IEA - Nanny statists have “exploited” this pandemic, says new research13/05/2021 13:35:00
Governments are increasingly adopting higher sin taxes and more prohibitions, finds the 2021 Nanny State Index
IFS - Elective hospital admissions dropped by a third last year, while outpatient appointments and non-COVID emergency admissions each fell by a fifth13/05/2021 12:35:00
New analysis by the Institute for Fiscal Studies, Harvard University and Imperial College London shows there were 2.9 million fewer planned admissions, 1.2 million fewer non-COVID-19 emergency inpatient admissions and 17.1 million fewer outpatient appointments between March and December 2020 compared with the same period in 2019.
Policy needs to adjust following encouraging GDP data, says IEA expert13/05/2021 11:35:00
Julian Jessop, Economics Fellow at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, commented on the latest GDP and trade data from the Office for National Statistics
Queen's speech: IPPR reaction to ‘policy gulf’ on environment, planning, health and care agenda13/05/2021 10:35:00
Think tank welcomes some targets and commitments, but says bold action and clear policy must follow
Ill-considered ‘junk food’ ad ban “has to be binned”, says IEA expert13/05/2021 09:35:00
Christopher Snowdon, Head of Lifestyle Economics at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs responded to renewed government plans to ban ‘junk food’ advertising
Adam Smith Inst - "Nutty nanny statism": Government plans to ban 'junk food' advertising online and after 9.00pm11/05/2021 16:35:00
The Adam Smith Institute’s Head of Research Matthew Lesh responded to the Government maintaining plans to ban so-called ‘junk food’ from online advertising and before 9.00pm on television
“Unlikely to supercharge economic growth”: IEA experts respond to Queen’s Speech11/05/2021 15:35:00
Mark Littlewood, Director General at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, commented on the Queen’s Speech
JRF - Queen’s Speech: Where is the Employment Bill for low-paid workers?11/05/2021 14:35:00
JRF responds to today's Queen's Speech
The apprenticeship levy should be scrapped completely, says IEA expert11/05/2021 13:35:00
Professor Len Shackleton, Editorial and Research Fellow at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, responded to the news that £1bn of apprenticeship levy funds has gone unspent in the nine months since last May