Regions outside London hit hardest by post-Brexit price rises, says IPPR
Regions of the UK outside London are expected to experience greater impacts from price rises caused by Brexit, according to new research from the progressive policy think tank, IPPR.
Likely rises in transport costs will contribute to a disproportionate impact on household spending in areas outside the capital, the new analysis shows.
Researchers modelled the likely effect of two Brexit scenarios on prices and household spending and found the same pattern of effects under each.
They estimate how price rises due to likely new trade barriers with the EU after Brexit will affect areas of the UK in different ways, based on varying household spending patterns. The researchers found larger impacts outside London, in part because housing costs – expected to be less affected by Brexit – make up a smaller part of their spending. Meanwhile, transport costs, likely to rise more through increased prices of vehicles, make up a larger part of household spending outside the capital.
Impacts on prices are estimated to be largest under a ‘hard’ Brexit, where the UK leaves the EU on WTO terms. Under this scenario, an average ‘basket’ of goods and services bought by a household would rise in price by 2.7 per cent in London, compared with rises of between 3 and 3.2 per cent for households elsewhere in the UK.
The IPPR report, which explores the potential effects of Brexit on different income groups, nations and regions, genders and ethnicities, also found that:
- More highly paying industries, such as finance and chemicals, are expected to suffer more negative economic impacts (negative GVA) from Brexit. But a number of lower-paid sectors are also expected to be negatively hit.
- Prices are expected to rise for all household income groups, and reductions in tariffs for imports from non-EU countries would be unlikely to fully compensate for these price rises. But price rises will have a broadly neutral effect on income inequality.
- Wales and the North East are the regions with the highest EU goods exports relative to the size of their economies, putting them at greater risk of an adverse economic impact from trade barriers in goods. Localities with the highest EU goods exports relative to the size of their economies are Flintshire and Wrexham, Sunderland, Telford and Wrekin, South and West Derbyshire, and Luton.
The report recommends that the best way of minimising the predicted negative impacts of Brexit on poorer groups and regions is for the UK to pursue the option of a ‘shared market’ in its negotiations with the EU. This would include a comprehensive customs union and an agreement on regulatory alignment with the single market, together with a mechanism to allow for the possibility of divergence over time.
Commenting on the findings, IPPR senior research fellow and author of the report, Marley Morris, said:
“Our findings suggest that post-Brexit price rises will squeeze incomes more in parts of the UK outside London.
“Limiting these impacts will require a new relationship with the EU that preserves our trade links. Negotiating a ‘shared market’ – based on a customs union and a deal on alignment with the EU’s single market – is the most promising strategy for minimising post-Brexit price increases for households.”
Florri Burton email@example.com / 07867 388895
David Wastell firstname.lastname@example.org / 07921 403651
The report’s author, Marley Morris, is available for interview.
1. The full report ‘An equal exit? The distributional consequences of leaving the EU’ is available (under embargo) upon request. It will also be available online at 00:01 Wednesday 4th July 2018 at: https://www.ippr.org/research/publications/an-equal-exit
2. The report ‘The Shared Market’ is also available here: https://www.ippr.org/publications/the-shared-market
3. The analysis in this report is drawn from a range of academic studies. The regional price impacts analysis is based on the results of the LSE’s modelling of the impacts of Brexit (‘The costs and benefits of leaving the EU: trade effects’ (Dhingra et al. 2017).) Using a similar approach to the LSE’s distributional analysis (‘Who bears the pain? How the costs of Brexit would be distributed across income groups’ (Breinlich et al. 2016)), we combine the LSE model’s results on final price impacts with regional household expenditure data from the ONS Living Costs and Food survey. In the LSE’s study, ‘Soft Brexit’ is defined as staying in the single market, while ‘hard Brexit’ is defined as leaving on WTO terms.
4. The report assesses and evaluates assumptions of both Remain and Leave supporters. It presents the evidence on where Brexit might have a positive, neutral or negative effect on inequality. The analysis has been reviewed by a number of academics who were involved in the original research we have drawn from. The report recommends a position in the Brexit negotiations from a particular progressive perspective, while also recognising that those with different priorities might draw different conclusions.
5. IPPR is a registered charity and the UK’s pre-eminent progressive think tank. We exist to promote research and educate the public on the economic, social and political sciences and in science and technology, the voluntary sector and social enterprise, public services, and industry and commerce. With more than 40 staff in offices in London, Manchester, Newcastle and Edinburgh, IPPR is Britain’s only national think tank with a truly national presence. IPPR did not take a position in the referendum on the UK’s membership of the European Union and the findings of this report are not intended to support either a ‘leave’ or ‘remain’ position.
Latest News from
IFS - Higher education enables graduates to move to places with better career prospects – but this leads to brain drain from the North and coastal areas17/09/2021 11:20:00
By age 27, graduates are 10 percentage points more likely to have moved away from the area where they grew up than otherwise similar non-graduates. Graduates who move tend to move to London and other affluent cities and experience large gains in earnings. This suggests that higher education enables people to move to areas that offer better labour market opportunities.
JRF - New Cabinet faces living standards crisis if they go ahead with cut to Universal Credit16/09/2021 15:20:00
JRF responds to House of Commons debate on the planned cut to Universal Credit and Working Tax Credit.
Civitas - Two Tests for UK Trade: Does seamless, tariff-free trade boost exports and does distance matter?16/09/2021 14:20:00
During the UK’s departure from the European Union, debate about UK trade policy was dominated by two assertions:
Inflation could reach 5 per cent by Christmas, says IEA Expert15/09/2021 16:10:00
Julian Jessop, Economics Fellow at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, responded to ONS consumer price inflation figures for August 2021
IEA - Think tank helped ensure UK-EU FTA “against the odds”15/09/2021 14:15:00
The Institute of Economic Affairs has reached the final of this year’s Templeton Freedom Award, which celebrates organisations that have made a meaningful impact on the proliferation of free market ideas through education, policy research or media outreach.
JRF - New research highlights ‘shameful’ racial disparities in housing system15/09/2021 09:10:00
Welfare and immigration policies are contributing to sharply unequal access to affordable housing among BAME communities. A new report from the independent Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF) analyses the impact of these policies.
IEA - UK ranks 12th amongst 165 jurisdictions in economic freedom14/09/2021 15:20:00
The UK ranks 12th out of 165 countries and territories included in the Economic Freedom of the World: 2021 Annual Report, released today by the Institute of Economic Affairs in conjunction with Canada’s Fraser Institute. Last year, the UK ranked 13th.
Adam Smith Inst - 2.1 Million Vulnerable Unvaccinated14/09/2021 10:05:00
Raft of measures proposed to protect human life and liberty as Covid-19 becomes endemic
Adam Smith Inst - NEW POLL: Brits back freer movement with New Zealand14/09/2021 09:05:00
A new poll from the Adam Smith Institute and C|T Group RSR confirms that Brits are eager to strike a trade deal with New Zealand which includes freer movement and mutual recognition of qualifications.
IFS - NHS funding boost should be enough to meet pressures over the next two years, but not in the medium term13/09/2021 14:20:00
Last Tuesday the Prime Minister announced a new funding settlement for health and social care in England. This included an additional £6.6 billion for NHS England in 2022−23 and £3.6 billion in 2023−24, on top of pre-pandemic plans, in the face of ongoing pressures from the COVID-19 pandemic.