Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
Report on the UK's opt-in Protocol published
The House of Lords EU Committee has recently published a report urging the Government to abandon its unilateral approach to EU Justice and Home Affairs Measures.
- Report: The UK's opt-in Protcol: implications of the Government's approach PDF
- Report: The UK's opt-in Protcol: implications of the Government's approach HMTL
- Volume of Evidence ( PDF 1.1 MB)
- Call for evidence ( PDF 103 KB)
- Government position on the JHA Opt-in (Letter dated 3 June 2014) ( PDF 191 KB)
- EU Sub-Committee on Justice, Institutions and Consumer Protection
The report considers the precedent that is being set by the UK Government seeking unilaterally to decide whether or not it is bound by particular EU legal measures.
The Committee has also reviewed a series of rulings of by the Court, in each of which the Government’s approach has been rejected. The Committee concludes that the Government’s policy “raises serious questions about the UK’s acceptance of the uniform application of EU law, the defining trait of the rule of law in the European Union”.
Comments from the Chairman, Baroness Quin:
“We launched this inquiry following a letter from the Home Secretary and Secretary of State for Justice in June 2014. It set out the Government’s strategy in relation to Protocol (No.21) of the Lisbon Treaty – the UK’s ability to opt out of certain EU legislation in relation to justice and home affairs measures. We wanted to understand the Government’s position and its implications.
“What we have discovered has astonished us. From the outset we struggled to find any witnesses who supported the Government’s position. The weight of the evidence left us in no doubt of three things: that the Government’s interpretation of the opt-in Protocol was legally unsustainable; that its litigation strategy ignored the case law of the Court; and that its stance could run counter to the UK's own interests as well as undermine its good standing among other Member States.
“The Government’s broad interpretation of the treaty provisions governing the UK’s opt-in would give the EU itself wide powers to increase its competence in other areas - a consequence this Government certainly does not want.
“Our principal recommendation is that the incoming Government should abandon what amounts to an unjustified policy of unilateralism that has brought no tangible benefit to the UK.”
The report also recommends that:
- the Government include only legislation with a Title V legal base in future annual opt-in reports, or that it makes clear where it has asserted that the opt-in Protocol applies to legislation without such a legal base.
- the Government reconsider its interpretation of “pursuant to”. None of the written or oral evidence received in the course of this inquiry supported, or referred to others supporting, the Government’s interpretation of “pursuant to”. The phrase “pursuant to” has an accepted legal meaning, namely that a Title V legal base is required before the opt-in can be triggered. A link to a legal base is also necessary to define the source of the EU’s power to act, and this is consistent with the principle of conferral.
- Government departments inform Parliament sooner when a Title V legal base is added by agreement of the Council.
- the European Commission confirm that the legal base of any individual proposal should be determined by its subject matter and purpose, not its intended geographical scope; and that geographical scope is a consequence of the choice of legal base.
- the Government focus on addressing any concerns over the choice of legal base through the existing mechanisms in the legislative process, particularly within the Council.
- the Government give careful consideration to the feasibility of an inter-institutional agreement on the scope of Title V. If Denmark decides to alter its opt-in arrangements to those of the UK and Ireland, three Member States will have an interest in an inter-institutional agreement on the scope of Title V.
- the Government seek the agreement of the EU institutions that in cases where the Council adds a Title V legal base to a proposal in the course of negotiations, that the three-month period should run from the date the Council agrees to add the Title V legal base. The opt-in Protocol would otherwise be rendered either partly or entirely ineffective.
Latest News from
Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
Committee urges COP26 to include nature-based solutions in its decision text18/10/2021 11:25:00
The House of Lords Science and Technology Committee has written to Alok Sharma MP, President for COP26 ahead of the conference on 31 October.
New website launched for Parliament’s Heritage Collections06/10/2021 15:33:00
Parliament has launched a new website dedicated to its historic and important Collections, including the Parliamentary Art Collection, the Historic Furniture and Decorative Arts Collection, and the Architectural Fabric Collection.
EU must follow UK-Spain deal on Gibraltar06/10/2021 11:38:00
When the UK left the EU Gibraltar did too, which left the region exposed to checks on goods and workers coming from Spain on which it relies.
Conduct Committee recommends changes to Code of Conduct for House of Lords Members’ Staff04/10/2021 11:38:00
The House of Lords Conduct Committee recently published a report recommending a number of updates to the Code of Conduct for staff who work for members of the House.
Government 'unprepared to press go' on 'evident and ready solutions' to post-Brexit movement of animals between UK and EU01/10/2021 11:38:00
The Government's lack of urgency to address 'glaring holes' in its post-Brexit provisions for the agri-food and livestock trade has left the UK at a competitive disadvantage, and could cause UK businesses to close.
UK Government and businesses must take decisive steps to boost sustainable consumption critical to protect global nature30/09/2021 15:33:00
The Government must strengthen its own sustainable procurement policies, and it should be illegal for UK businesses to use deforestation-linked commodities, if the UK is to demonstrate global leadership to protect nature, MPs say today.
Give Parliament and public ways to measure transport levelling up ‘infrastructure revolution’29/09/2021 11:25:00
The Government’s ‘levelling up’ concept needs to move beyond rhetoric and on to delivery, requiring targets and metrics to enable Parliament and public to identify success, says a new report from the Transport Select Committee, Major transport infrastructure projects.
Justice Committee calls for root and branch reform of prison mental health support29/09/2021 10:25:00
The mental health crisis in prisons will continue unless root and branch reform takes place, a report by the Justice Committee has found.
Government response to Business Committee Industrial Policy report published27/09/2021 13:43:00
The Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) Committee recently (24 September 2021) published the Government’s response [include link] to the BEIS Committee’s Industrial Policy report (which was published on 28th June 2021).