Researchers need to work harder to combat misinformation online, says Demos
A new report from Demos looking into how research and development is discussed and communicated about online shows the need for researchers to work harder to be a bigger part of the online conversation, in order to combat the rise of misinformation.
The report [published on 4 December], supported by Wellcome, calls on researchers to take steps to ensure expertise and evidence is more effectively part of discussions online through the production of more engaging content. One of these steps includes more explicitly linking research to the lived experience of relevant people and communities.
Beyond the Bubble also found that individuals observed across a range of social media platforms express scepticism about possible applications of new research, and sometimes the motivation behind it. The report showed that the public instead want to see clarity and transparency from those carrying out research.
The report makes further recommendations for how researchers can better communicate their research to the public, including:
- Mitigating scepticism of research through integrity, clarity and transparency around the motivation behind it and the possible applications of the research
- Making partnerships with existing influencers
- Highlighting the future applications of the research. People are invested in developments which are groundbreaking, completely new or cutting-edge
- Making content people-focussed, using case studies of people with admirable qualities and displaying lived experiences
Commenting on the report’s findings, Elliot Jones, Researcher at Demos and Beyond the Bubble co-author said:
“Social media is often accused of causing a breakdown in trust, as users can struggle to differentiate between true and false information, and the most popular content isn’t always the most accurate. However, if researchers use platforms’ optimisation for virality to their advantage, social media is an opportunity to open up expertise to the public. Researchers need to work harder to be a greater part of online conversations in order to create an informed debate, or we risk facts becoming ever more distorted and misused.“
Dr Ben Bleasdale, Policy and Advocacy Officer at Wellcome, said:
“In recent months science has been thrust up the political agenda with promises of funding on an unprecedented scale. But this enthusiasm will not last. As today’s report shows, the science community needs to develop a voice and a vision for science investment that can capture hearts, as well as minds.”
The research also found that many pieces of scientific research are discussed in political context and used as a way to endorse an existing view with new research findings. This gets a significant amount of traction compared to other presentations of findings, showing that researchers must find ways of effectively reaching those who would usually oppose the view that the findings support.
The full report can be found here.
NOTES TO EDITORS
Josh Tapper, Communications Officer, Demos
Phone: 020 3878 3955 | 07535748224 (out of hours)
Demos is Britain’s leading cross-party think-tank: an independent, educational charity, which produces original and innovative research.
Wellcome are a politically and financially independent foundation, existing to improve health by helping great ideas to thrive. Wellcome supports researchers, takes on big health challenges, campaigns for better science, and helps everyone get involved with science and health research.
Latest News from
IFS - Tax system discourages employment, investment and risk-taking. It needs reform.26/01/2021 11:35:00
Employees’ salaries currently attract thousands of pounds more in tax each year than the incomes of people who are self-employed or working through their own company. This is unfair and pushes people towards working through their own business rather than as employees. At the same time, the tax system discourages investing in a company and taking risks.
JRF - Cutting the lifeline now would be the wrong decision26/01/2021 10:35:00
If the Chancellor wants to wrap the nation’s arms around families facing a long period of financial insecurity he would keep the £20 for a further year rather than cut benefits and give a lump sum, ensuring that everyone who needs support during the year can benefit.
IEA - Oxfam’s proposals demonstrate “misunderstanding of economics and poverty relief”26/01/2021 09:35:00
Mark Littlewood comments on "The Inequality Virus" report
National League should suspend the season “with immediate effect”, says IEA expert21/01/2021 10:35:00
Statement by Professor Len Shackleton, Editorial and Research Fellow at free-market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs
BBC licence fee is “anachronistic and in dire need of reform”, says IEA expert21/01/2021 09:35:00
IEA responds to NAO report on the BBC licence fee
Hiking corporation tax would be ‘illogical and counterproductive”, says IEA expert19/01/2021 11:35:00
Mark Littlewood, Director General at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, responded to reports that the Chancellor Rishi Sunak is considering raising corporation tax
IPPR - UK risks EU retaliation if workers’ rights are rolled back19/01/2021 10:35:00
IPPR trade and EU relations expert says leaked proposal to cut working time protections would also be damaging and deeply unpopular
Any extension of the Universal Credit uplift should not be made permanent, says IEA expert19/01/2021 09:35:00
Professor Len Shackleton, Editorial and Research Fellow at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, responded to calls to extend the £20 a week Universal Credit uplift
King's Fund - Boost for local health partnerships as six areas secure place on £3 million grant-funding programme14/01/2021 12:35:00
Six areas in England have been chosen to join the first phase of a major grant-funding and development programme designed to improve the health and wellbeing of communities and tackle health inequalities.