Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
Retail Price Index must be fixed, says Lords Committee
The Economic Affairs Committee publishes its report on 'Measuring Inflation'. The report considers the future of the retail price index (RPI) and its use by the Government.
- Report: Measuring Inflation (HTML)
- Report: Measuring Inflation (PDF)
- Inquiry: The use of RPI
- Evidence: The use of RPI
- Economic Affairs Committee
The Committee finds that the UK Statistics Authority is at risk of being in breach of its statutory duties on the publication of statistics, by refusing to correct an error that it openly admits exists in the Retail Prices Index (RPI). This error, made in 2010 when the process for collecting price quotes for clothing was altered, has resulted in RPI being 0.3 percentage points higher since 2010. As a result, commuters and students pay more because rail fare increases and student loan interest rates are linked to RPI, and holders of index-linked gilts at the time received an unwarranted windfall. The UK Statistics Authority has a duty to "promote and safeguard the quality of official statistics".
The Committee calls for the Authority to follow the procedure for correcting the error and, given that RPI remains in widespread use, resume a programme of regular methodological improvements.
The Committee also recommends a single measure of general inflation for use by the Government. This is to prevent so-called ‘index-shopping’ by Government, where indices are chosen because of their impact on the public finances rather than their merits as measures of inflation.
Lord Forsyth of Drumlean, Chairman of the Economic Affairs Committee, yesterday said:
"When the Government gives money to people it is generally opting to adjust payments for inflation using the Consumer Prices Index. But when it takes money from people, it is generally opting to use the Retail Prices Index, which has been around one per cent higher than CPI in recent years. This simply is not fair. Together with the UK Statistics Authority, it needs to agree upon a single measure of general inflation which is used for uprating purposes. In the interim the Government should desist from 'index shopping' by switching to CPI in all areas not governed by private contracts, including index-linked gilts.
"The UK Statistics Authority's refusal to fix the problems it admits RPI has is untenable. By continuing to publish an index which it admits is flawed, it is arguably in breach of its statutory duty to promote and safeguard official statistics. It should seek to resolve the problems with the index, consulting the Bank of England and the Chancellor of the Exchequer where necessary, and stop treating it as a ‘legacy measure’ when it remains in widespread use.
"This is not just a technical debate. The Authority’s error created winners and losers. For example, commuters and students pay more because rail fare increases and student loan interest rates are linked to RPI."
- The main problem with RPI is an unintended consequence of a routine methodological improvement by the UK Statistics Authority to the collection of price quotes for clothing. This has widened the difference (the 'formula effect') in the annual rate of change in RPI compared to the Consumer Prices Index (CPI). As a result of the clothing change, the 'formula effect' has increased from 0.5 per cent to 0.8 per cent.
- The Authority's error has created winners, such as holders of RPI-linked Government bonds, who have received around £1 billion more in interest payments every year, and losers, such as commuters and students with annual rail fare increases and the interest rate on student loans linked to RPI.
- Correcting the error would require the Chancellor's approval because it would cause "material detriment" to index-linked gilt holders. When asked, the UK Statistics Authority told us they had not asked the Chancellor because they expected he would say no. The Treasury said they could not act, because no such request had been submitted. The Committee concludes that such a request should be submitted, and the Chancellor should consent.
- The gap between RPI and CPI has encouraged governments to 'index shop': benefits, tax thresholds and public sector and state pensions were all switched from being uprated by the higher RPI to the lower CPI in 2011.
- To have credibility, a single general measure of inflation requires a satisfactory measure of owner-occupier housing costs. At present, there are critics of how the RPI and the Consumer Prices Index including owner-occupiers’ housing costs (CPIH) do this. The UK Statistics Authority should agree on a best measure of owner-occupier housing costs to be used in the new single general measure.
- The Committee is unconvinced that the UK Statistics Authority should consider the interests of those materially affected by changes to statistical measures in making decisions about adjustments or corrections. UKSA has a statutory duty to promote and safeguard the quality of official statistics, which it may have neglected in the case of RPI.
Latest News from
Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
Third report scrutinising Brexit-related international agreements published22/02/2019 10:05:00
The European Union Committee has published its third report in its new role scrutinising Brexit-related treaties.
One family: rethinking Britain’s relationship with the Overseas Territories21/02/2019 14:05:00
Relations between the UK and the Overseas Territories have been under strain in recent years and steps should be taken to strengthen the bonds between them, say the Foreign Affairs Committee.
Government must end era of throwaway fashion19/02/2019 16:15:00
The Environmental Audit Committee calls on the Government to make fashion retailers take responsibility for the waste they create. A one penny producer responsibility charge on each item of clothing could pay for better clothing collection and recycling.
Healthcare (International Arrangements) Bill needs more safeguards, Committee argues19/02/2019 11:25:00
The Constitution Committee yesterday released a report on the Healthcare (International Arrangements) Bill, raising concerns over the Bill's use of broad delegated powers and lack of adequate safeguards.
Rethink arms licences to Saudi-coalition, Lords Committee says18/02/2019 15:25:00
The International Relations Committee believes that the Government is narrowly on the wrong side of international humanitarian law on arm sales to Saudi Arabia given the volume and type of arms being exported to the Saudi-led coalition, they are highly likely to be the cause of significant civilian casualties in Yemen.
Second report scrutinising Brexit-related international agreements published13/02/2019 14:15:00
The European Union Committee has published its second report in its new role scrutinising Brexit-related treaties.
Uncertainty over future UK participation in Erasmus and Horizon programmes13/02/2019 11:25:00
The EU Home Affairs Sub-Committee publishes its report 'Brexit: the Erasmus and Horizon programmes', highlighting the impact Brexit will have on UK participation in the EU’s international exchange and research and innovation programmes.
UK unprepared for new fisheries conservation rules11/02/2019 14:25:00
The EU Energy and Environment Sub-Committee recently published its report on the implementation and enforcement of the EU landing obligation.
Committee asks Minister about ‘no deal’ Brexit security preparations08/02/2019 14:25:00
The House of Lords EU Home Affairs Sub-Committee has written to Rt Hon Nick Hurd MP, Minister of State for Policing and the Fire Service, as part of ongoing correspondence on its Brexit: the proposed UK-EU security treaty report.