Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
'Right to be forgotten' is misguided in principle and unworkable in practice, say Lords
A recent judgment by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) leads to results which are misguided in principle and unworkable in practice, says the House of Lords EU Home Affairs, Health and Education Sub-Committee in its report.
- Report: EU Data Protection law: a 'right to be forgotten'? (HTML)
- Report: EU Data Protection law: a 'right to be forgotten'? (PDF)
- Evidence: EU Data Protection law: a 'right to be forgotten'? (PDF 777 KB)
- Inquiry: The right to be forgotten
- EU Sub-Committee F: Home Affairs, Health and Education
The Court’s interpretation of Article 12 of the 1995 Data Protection Directive, which was drafted three years before Google was founded, has resulted in the ruling that the search engine’s European sites must process more than 70,000 data removal requests that it has received since its web form went live on 30th May, 17 days after the judgment.
After having heard evidence from data protection experts, the Information Commissioner’s Office, the Minister for Justice and Civil Liberties, Simon Hughes, and Google itself, the Committee recommends that the UK Government must continue to fight to ensure that the updated Regulation no longer includes any provision on the lines of the Commission’s ‘right to be forgotten’ or the European Parliament’s ‘right to erasure’.
Chairman of the Sub-Committee, Baroness Prashar, said:
“The expression, ‘right to be forgotten’ is misleading. Information can be made more difficult to access, but it does not just disappear. Anyone anywhere in the world now has information at the touch of a button, and that includes detailed personal information about people in all countries of the globe. Neither the 1995 Directive, nor the CJEU’s interpretation of it, reflects the incredible advance in technology that we see today.
We believe that the judgment of the Court is unworkable. It does not take into account the effect the ruling will have on smaller search engines which, unlike Google, are unlikely to have the resources to process the thousands of removal requests they are likely to receive.
It is also wrong in principle to leave search engines themselves the task of deciding whether to delete information or not, based on vague, ambiguous and unhelpful criteria. We heard from witnesses how uncomfortable they are with the idea of a commercial company sitting in judgment on issues like that.
There are compelling arguments that, in the new Regulation, search engines should not be classed as data controllers. We do not believe that individuals should be able to have links to accurate and lawfully available information about them removed, simply because they do not like what is said.
It is incredibility difficult for legislation to keep up or ‘future proof’ the unforeseen leaps that technology is bound to make. We do, however, need to ensure that the next Regulation does not attempt to give individuals rights which are unenforceable.”
Latest News from
Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
Outsourcing and treatment of contracted staff – Ministry of Defence ‘must do better’, says Defence Committee27/05/2022 09:10:00
The Ministry of Defence’s outsourcing practice of ancillary services, such as firefighting and vehicle maintenance, is ‘not exemplary’ and the MoD pays little consideration to providing services in-house, says the cross-party Defence Committee in a report published yesterday.
Government must act on 'ghost children' missing from education system26/05/2022 16:25:00
The Government has cancelled multi-million pound contract with Randstad, but response to Committee's Catch-Up Report falls short on tackling persistent absence.
Systemic failures of leadership, planning and preparation: MPs slam Government role in UK withdrawal from Afghanistan25/05/2022 11:15:00
In a damning report from the Foreign Affairs Committee, MPs say the Foreign Office, the National Security Advisor and Ministers must accept responsibility for the failure to prepare or respond, abandoning the UK’s allies and damaging the UK’s interests.
Decarbonising power supply sector inquiry launched by Business Committee23/05/2022 11:25:00
The Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) Committee recently (20 May) launched a new inquiry into the Government’s plans to decarbonise the UK’s power supply sector.
'Chaotic' adult prison education system crying out for overhaul18/05/2022 15:15:00
Education must be at heart of prison system, say MPs, as new report highlights freefall in quality of and engagement with existing provision.
Prison Education Report17/05/2022 14:15:00
The Education Committee publishes its report on Prison education on Wednesday 18th May. The embargo on the report will be lifted for media publication on Tuesday 17th May at 10pm.
Government increases its ambition on water quality after decades of inaction16/05/2022 15:33:00
The Government and the water industry regulator Ofwat accept that the next water industry price review process has needed to prioritise long term investment in the sewerage network, to take better account for natural capital and to increase the use of nature-based solutions.
Government rejects call for integrated recovery plan to tackle backlog caused by pandemic16/05/2022 11:38:00
Committee Chair Jeremy Hunt has criticised the Government’s rejection of a recommendation for a broad national health and care recovery plan to tackle the backlog caused by the pandemic.