Road pricing should not be a ‘post-covid cash cow’, says IEA expert
Professor Philip Booth responds to road pricing proposals
Responding to reports that the Treasury is considering a new national road pricing scheme, IEA Senior Academic Fellow Professor Philip Booth said:
“The Treasury is right to examine nationwide road pricing, something which should have been introduced when the Smeed Report recommended it in 1964. However, it is important that road pricing properly reflects the cost of road use and varies with the amount of congestion at any particular time: at some points in the day, the correct price for road use is zero.
“It is also important, if road pricing is introduced, that the opportunity is used to encourage the building of roads by private providers and, indeed, that the privatisation of existing roads is considered.
“It is vital that the Treasury uses road pricing to ensure that road space is better used, congestion reduced and more roads are provided. It should not be a post-covid cash cow.”
Notes to editors
For media enquiries, please contact Emily Carver, Head of Media, on 07715942731 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Professor Philip Booth is available for interview and further comment.
For further IEA reading on road pricing, click here.
The mission of the Institute of Economic Affairs is to improve understanding of the fundamental institutions of a free society by analysing and expounding the role of markets in solving economic and social problems. The IEA is a registered educational charity and independent of all political parties.
Latest News from
JRF - Coalition warns it would be a terrible mistake to cut the £20 uplift to Universal Credit01/12/2020 10:35:00
Over 60 organisations and bishops issue a public statement expressing their deep concern at the failure of the Government to announce that they are making the £20 uplift to Universal Credit permanent and extending it to legacy benefits.
Evidence used to justify hospitality closures is “tenuous,” says IEA research01/12/2020 09:35:00
Research from the Institute of Economic Affairs, authored by Head of Lifestyle Economics Christopher Snowdon, casts doubt over the relevance of evidence on which Tier 2 and Tier 3 restrictions on the hospitality sector will be based.
The Spending Review is 'unlikely to be enough to address health and care pressures': The King's Fund responds to the Spending Review26/11/2020 14:35:00
Sally Warren, Director of Policy at The King’s Fund, responded to the Chancellor’s Spending Review
Initial reaction from IFS researchers on Spending Review 2020 and OBR forecasts26/11/2020 13:35:00
IFS Director Paul Johnson says: “Rishi Sunak has been spending truly astonishing amounts of money this year and plans to continue to do so next year in response to Covid.
Spending Review 2020: IPPR response26/11/2020 12:35:00
Spending review misunderstands 'basic economics' and will leave economy needlessly damaged
Rishi cannot tax our way out of debt or spend our way out of a recession — Adam Smith Institute26/11/2020 11:35:00
Following the spending review by the Chancellor, the Adam Smith Institute’s Deputy Director Matt Kilcoyne criticises the public sector spending splurge
Chancellor’s words ring hollow as less is spent on levelling up - JRF26/11/2020 10:35:00
Helen Barnard, Director of the independent Joseph Rowntree Foundation responded to the Chancellor’s Spending Review
IEA - The Chancellor’s diagnosis was correct but “the medicine is inadequate”26/11/2020 09:35:00
Mark Littlewood, Director General at the free-market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, responded to the Chancellor’s Spending Review