Ruling regarding minimum wage for off-shored public contracts
The minimum wage fixed in the context of the award of public contracts may not be extended to employees of a subcontractor established in another Member State, where those employees perform the contract at issue exclusively in that State
It is incompatible with the freedom to provide services to require the payment of a minimum wage without any connection with the cost of living in that Member State
A Law of the Land of North Rhine-Westphalia (Germany) provides that certain public service contracts may be awarded only to undertakings which, at the time of the submission of the tender, have agreed to pay their staff a minimum hourly wage of €8.62 for the performance of the service. That law seeks to ensure that employees are paid a reasonable wage in order to avoid both ‘social dumping’ and the penalisation of competing undertakings which grant a reasonable wage to their employees.
The city of Dortmund, applying that law to a tender for a public contract relating to the digitalisation of documents and the conversion of data for its urban-planning service, required that thesuccessful tenderer guarantee a minimum wage of €8.62 even for workers employed by a subcontractor established in another Member State (in this case, Poland) and who would carry out the work exclusively in that State. Since the competent German Public Procurement Board, hearing an action brought by Bundesdruckerei, a German undertaking concerned by that invitation to tender, has doubts as to the compatibility of the legislation at issue (as applied by the city of Dortmund) with European Union law and, in particular, with the freedom to provide services, it referred a question to the Court of Justice.
In today’s judgment, the Court replies that, in a situation such as that at issue in the present case, in which a tenderer intends to carry out a public contract by having recourse exclusively to workers employed by a subcontractor established in a Member State other than that to which the contracting authority belongs, the freedom to provide services precludes the Member State to which the contracting authority belongs from requiring the subcontractor to pay a minimum wage to workers.
The Court declares first of all1that such legislation is capable of constituting a restriction of the freedom to provide services. The imposition of a minimum wage on a subcontractor established in another Member State in which minimum rates of pay are lower constitutes an additional economic burden that may prohibit, impede or render less attractive the provision of services in that otherMember State.
The Court notes however that such legislation may, in principle, be justified by the objective of protecting employees.
However, in so far as it applies solely to public contracts, such legislation is not appropriate for achieving that objective if there is no information to suggest that employees working in the private sector are not in need of the same wage protection as those working in the context of public contracts.
1 After holding that, in contrast to the Rüffert case, in particular (see the judgment of the Court of 3 April 2008 in Case C-346/06 and press release No 20/08), the present case does not concern the posting of workers.
In any event, the national legislation at issue, in so far as its scope extends to cover a situation such as that in the dispute, appears disproportionate.
By imposing a fixed minimum wage corresponding, to that required in order to ensure reasonable remuneration for employees in Germany in the light of the cost of living in that country, but which bears no relation to the cost of living in the Member State in which the services relating to the public contract at issue are performed (in this case, Poland) and thereby preventing subcontractors established in another Member State from deriving a competitive advantage from the differences between the respective rates of pay, that national legislation goes beyond what is necessary to ensure that the objective of employee protection is attained.
NOTE: A reference for a preliminary ruling allows the courts and tribunals of the Member States, in disputes which have been brought before them, to refer questions to the Court of Justice about the interpretation of European Union law or the validity of a European Union act. The Court of Justice does not decide the dispute itself. It is for the national court or tribunal to dispose of the case in accordance with the Court’s decision, which is similarly binding on other national courts or tribunals before which a similar issue is raised.
Latest News from
ESMA Provides Guidance on The Compliance Function Under MIFID II05/06/2020 16:43:00
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s securities markets regulator, today publishes the final guidelines on the MiFID II compliance function.
Returning to free movement across borders is of utmost importance05/06/2020 16:08:00
A swift return to a fully functional Schengen area is needed to safeguard freedom of movement and ensure the EU’s economic recovery, says the Civil Liberties Committee.
Space policy for a sustainable economy: Council adopts conclusions05/06/2020 15:25:00
Space policy can play an important role in achieving a sustainable EU economy.
Coronavirus inquiry: Our letter to Mayor of London Sadiq Khan05/06/2020 14:33:00
Today, we have launched an inquiry into the impact of coronavirus on ethnic minorities, as the pandemic has shone a light on long-standing, structural race inequality in Britain.
Speech by President von der Leyen at the Global Vaccine Summit05/06/2020 13:25:00
Speech given yesterday by President von der Leyen at the Global Vaccine Summit.
Speech of Vice President Věra Jourová on countering disinformation amid COVID-19 “From pandemic to infodemic”05/06/2020 12:38:00
Speech given yesterday by Vice President Věra Jourová on countering disinformation amid COVID-19 “From pandemic to infodemic”.
ESMA Promotes Convergence in The Supervision of Costs in UCITS And AIFS05/06/2020 11:33:00
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s securities markets regulator, yesterday published a supervisory briefing on the supervision by National Competent Authorities (NCAs) of costs applicable to Undertakings for the Collective Investment in Transferable Securities (UCITS) and Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs).
Public access to Council documents: 2019 report05/06/2020 09:25:00
The Council recently (03 June 2020) approved its annual report on the implementation of Regulation 1049/2001 regarding public access to documents.
Yemen: EU allocates over €70 million to help most vulnerable population05/06/2020 08:10:00
The Commission will provide new funding of €70 million in Yemen, as the coronavirus threatens to worsen one of the world's worst humanitarian crises, where famine already looms.