Selling digital insecurity
Addressing the sale of digital insecurity requires addressing its root causes and a coherent response from states, civil society, and the private sector.
Offensive cyber capabilities pose a significant threat to national and international security. In many cases, these capabilities are a legitimate national security tool. However, such capabilities can also cause significant – and often unpredictable – damage.
The use of these capabilities to spread disinformation, mount disruptive cyberattacks, and launch hack-and-leak operations has derailed elections, silenced dissenting political voices, disrupted the lives of individuals, communities, companies, and even entire governments.
Although the most advanced offensive cyber capabilities are still held by states, there is a growing global marketplace for digital insecurity, with capabilities ranging from openly advertised services to more opaque, bespoke contracts and cybercriminal markets.
This week, the White House announced an executive order including several new measures to combat risks posed by commercial spyware to human rights and US national security. As noted in the UK’s recent Integrated Review Refresh, the fusion of cyber threats generated by the sale of digital insecurity demands a coherent response. The UK’s new International Technology Strategy also commits to protecting security interests through ensuring sensitive technology does not fall into hostile hands.
To address the sale of digital insecurity, states must work with civil society, victims and the private sector. They must also cooperate with major tech companies, particularly those that have been exploited as attack vectors. More controversially, states should cooperate with genuinely responsible companies offering commercial hacking and online influence services – those willing to demonstrate respect for human rights and operate within the boundaries of national and international law – while also maximizing pressure from their investors and financial backers.
Click here to continue reading the full version of this Expert Comment on the Chatham House website.
Original article link: https://www.chathamhouse.org/2023/03/selling-digital-insecurity
Latest News from
AI governance must balance creativity with sensitivity08/06/2023 12:20:00
Artificial intelligence (AI) can transform lives but policy and regulation must ensure it benefits all rather than maintains the status quo for a privileged few.
How will geopolitics shape Turkey’s international future?06/06/2023 12:20:00
How geopolitics will affect Turkey’s relationship with the West will depend on whether they compete or cooperate in their shared neighbourhood.
The balancing act for the UK’s semiconductor strategy02/06/2023 13:10:00
How should the UK balance economic security and the energy transition to net-zero in times of worsening geopolitical tension?
Kenya’s debt struggles go far deeper than Chinese loans01/06/2023 13:25:00
Alleged cyberattacks spotlight China’s role in Kenya’s debt problems, but must not be allowed to overshadow the country’s broader failings in its financing.
Iran: How to counter covert action in the digital age30/05/2023 15:10:00
The case of Iran shows that countering covert action in the digital age requires transparency, persistence and international cooperation. But also that it is unrealistic to expect states to stop completely.
The end of the Arab Spring and there is a price to pay24/05/2023 09:20:00
The future of the region is still up for grabs. It will be up to those who believe in democracy and progress to seize it.
Turkey’s politics on the cusp of generational change23/05/2023 15:10:00
Irrespective of the results of the presidential runoff, Turkey’s election will define its politics for decades to come.
G7 China statement could enhance global economic stability23/05/2023 13:20:00
The G7 offer to China for managing economic relations is credible, but careful implementation will be critical in persuading China to respond positively.