Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
Should the UK continue to spring forward and fall back?
EU Internal Market Sub-Committee publishes its report on the future of clock changes.
- Clock changes: is it time for change? (HTML)
- Clock changes: is it time for change? (PDF)
- Inquiry: Discontinuing seasonal changes of time
- Subsidiarity Assessment: discontinuing seasonal changes of time, October 2018 (HTML)
- Subsidiarity Assessment: discontinuing seasonal changes of time, October 2018 (PDF)
- EU Internal Market Sub-Committee
The report examines the implications for the UK of the European Commission's proposal to end seasonal clock changes in the EU. It considers the two alternative scenarios arising for the UK, should the proposal be adopted: non-aligning, and having a varying time difference with EU neighbours; or aligning, and having to adopt either winter-time or summer-time on a permanent basis. While non-alignment could negatively affect businesses and people in Northern Ireland, a permanent time zone could have major implications for other UK citizens, particularly in Scotland and the north of England.
The report finds that considerably more evidence would be needed for the Government to make that complex decision. The Government should therefore undertake preparatory work, including by reviewing or commissioning relevant research on how clock changes affect a range of issues, from health and road safety to trade, and devising a strategy for consultation.
In October 2018, this Committee published a Subsidiarity Assessment of the Commission’s proposal to end clock changes, where it took the view that the issue did not warrant action at EU level and the proposal was therefore a breach of subsidiarity. This Assessment was agreed by the House and submitted as a formal Reasoned Opinion, or ‘yellow card’, to the European Commission. The inquiry has only reinforced the Committee’s view that action on clock changes at EU level is unwarranted.
Chair of the EU Internal Market Sub-Committee, Baroness Donaghy, yesterday said:
“So far the Government has stuck its head in the sand on the EU Commission’s proposal, hoping that it goes away. However, if it doesn’t, we could be caught unaware and unprepared to make a decision, leaving the island of Ireland with two time zones at different times of the year and causing difficulties for people and businesses in Northern Ireland. “
“This is a complex issue with a range of consequences for different industries and people in the United Kingdom. If the UK chose to align itself with the EU, it would need to decide which permanent time zone it should adopt. Before making a final decision, the Government must fully examine the implications of aligning or non-aligning with the EU, look at and where necessary commission relevant research and give the public and other stakeholders an opportunity to have their say.”
- The Committee received no compelling evidence to suggest that the current system of seasonal changes does not work well for the UK.
- The EU Commission has little evidence that the abolition of clock changes would make material improvements over the status quo. It should carry out a full impact assessment so that Member States can consider the proposal in the light of all the relevant evidence.
- The Committee was surprised at the lack of conclusive evidence regarding the effects of clock changes on a range of issues, including health and wellbeing, agriculture and road safety. More needs to be done to help the UK make an evidence-based decision on its time arrangements.
- A time border would have enormous practical implications for firms and citizens in Northern Ireland, disrupting well-established ways of doing business and organising daily life.
- It is not clear whether a future Northern Ireland Executive would, under the current EU proposal and the Protocol on Ireland/Northern Ireland, be free to choose between having a one-hour time difference for part of the year with the Republic of Ireland or with the rest of the UK. Even if Northern Ireland has a free choice, either option could have challenging consequences for people in and trade between Northern Ireland, Ireland and Great Britain.
Latest News from
Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
Committee approves appointment of Antony Jenkins and John Taylor to Prudential Regulation Committee15/01/2021 11:38:00
The Treasury Committee publishes two reports on the appointments of Antony Jenkins and John Taylor to the Bank of England’s Prudential Regulation Committee (PRC).
Decisions of the Committee 12 Januuary 202115/01/2021 09:25:00
On 12 January 2021 the Committee considered all e-petitions which had, before 7 January 2021, reached over 10,000 signatures and received a Government response, or had received a revised response.
UK and NATO must not leave Afghanistan before peace-talks conclude13/01/2021 16:15:00
The International Relations and Defence Committee publishes its report, The UK and Afghanistan.
Government response wasted opportunity to fix flaws in UC system13/01/2021 11:38:00
The Work and Pensions Committee publishes the Government response to its report Universal Credit: The wait for a first payment.
Future UK-EU relations: energy, environment and health call for evidence11/01/2021 15:20:00
The EU Environment Sub-Committee is holding a short inquiry on the UK-EU Trade and Cooperation Agreement as it relates to its remit: energy, environment, health, food trade, agriculture, fishing, climate change and chemicals.
Covid-19: How has the Government received scientific advice, and how has the advice been used? Cross-party group of MPs publish analysis08/01/2021 13:05:00
The House of Commons Science and Technology Committee today publishes its analysis of the way the Government has received, and applied, scientific evidence and advice during the first period of the coronavirus pandemic up to autumn 2020.
Digital inequality compounding the economic inequality “harshly” exposed by covid-1908/01/2021 12:05:00
“Litany” of DCMS failures means business and homes in rural areas could be locked out of gigabit broadband for years to come.
Committee urges Chancellor to extend safety net to save summer festivals08/01/2021 10:15:00
The Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee Committee writes to the Chancellor asking him to extend Government-backed insurance schemes to festivals and live music events or face them disappearing from our fields and cities for good.