Targeted Support and Tax Grabs: ASI Responds to the Chancellor's Announcement on Cost of Living Relief Measures
Morgan Schondelmeier Director of Operations at the Adam Smith Institute responds to the Chancellor’s Statement on the Cost of Living.
We welcome the Government’s introduction of targeted support for households, a policy which the Adam Smith Institute called for in a recent report.
A one off cash payment direct to the most vulnerable households is the clearest way to provide immediate support with the least distortionary effects. Uprating benefits in line with CPI is also a sensible measure to ensure the least well off don’t get left behind. Finally, the Chancellor is right to scrap the repayments on the energy bills rebate - a poorly designed scheme from the start. It’s just a shame that it took the Chancellor so long to come to these conclusions.
A conclusion the Chancellor never should have reached was that a windfall tax is a good idea. Spending months arguing against it both practically and ideologically and then caving to pressure from the left leaves much to be desired for a ‘fiscally conservative’ Chancellor. Even with the sensible sunset clause and investment measures, a windfall tax is still not the most effective way to raise revenue and sets a precedent that the UK is a risky place to do business.
Notes to editors:
For further comments or to arrange an interview, contact Emily Fielder, email@example.com | 0758 477 8207.
The Adam Smith Institute is a free market, neoliberal think tank based in London. It advocates classically liberal public policies to create a richer, freer world.
Latest News from
Norwegian gas strike shows the danger of the UK’s dithering on domestic drilling, says IEA energy analyst05/07/2022 15:25:00
Andy Mayer, energy analyst at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs comments on the strike action by Norwegian offshore workers
Online sales tax would worsen cost of living crisis, warns IEA paper01/07/2022 09:25:00
An online sales tax would help commercial landlords at the expense of consumers
Adam Smith Institute - Slim Down the Cabinet Office to Ensure Value for Taxpayers29/06/2022 14:20:00
Reduce the Cabinet Office headcount and simplify its structure to ensure greater efficiency says think tank
JRF - New evidence of the ‘year of financial fear’ being endured by UK’s low-income families29/06/2022 13:20:00
2022 has seen low-income families going without essentials, building up arrears and taking on debt just to get by
IEA - Online Safety Bill hands unprecedented censorship powers to Secretary of State and Ofcom, warns new research28/06/2022 15:20:00
Online Safety Bill hands unprecedented censorship powers to Secretary of State and Ofcom, warns new research
Higher debt interest costs should not prevent tax cuts, says IEA economist23/06/2022 15:35:00
Julian Jessop, Economics Fellow at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, commented on the latest ONS public finances data
IFS - Inequalities in early child development remained stubbornly high through the 2010s23/06/2022 12:15:00
Inequalities in the early cognitive, social and emotional development of children in the UK, which are so important in shaping later life outcomes, have changed little between those born in the early 2000s and those born in the early 2010s.
Mistake to reinstate the pension triple lock, says IEA labour market expert23/06/2022 10:05:00
Professor Len Shackleton, labour market expert at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs commented on the return of the pension triple lock, which will see the state pension rise by 10 per cent in line with inflation.
Work Foundation - Research uncovers ‘digital poverty’ across North West’s rural communities with one in four struggling to complete key tasks online23/06/2022 09:05:00
A new study by researchers at Lancaster University reveals 28% of the population in rural North West England are not confident completing key tasks online, such as applying for a job or making an online call. Most alarmingly, over half of those aged 65 and above and those on lower incomes lack digital skills, meaning those most in need of online services are least likely to be able to access them.