Terrorism guidelines to be revised following legislation changes
Proposals for revisions to some of the current sentencing guidelines for terrorism offences in England and Wales were published for consultation today by the Sentencing Council, following significant legislative changes brought in by the new Counter Terrorism and Border Security Act 2019.
The main legislative changes impacting the guidelines include increases to the statutory maximum sentences for some offences, and an expansion of some offences.
The Council is seeking views from judges, magistrates and others interested in criminal justice on the proposed changes. The consultation runs from 22 October to 3 December 2019.
The main revisions include:
- Increased sentencing levels for the Encouragement of Terrorism, Failure to Disclose Information about Acts of Terrorism and Collection of Terrorist Information guidelines, to reflect the new increased statutory maximum sentences;
- Amendment of the culpability factors in:
- the Support for a Proscribed Organisation guideline, to provide for offenders convicted of the new offence of expressing supportive views for a proscribed organisation, reckless as to whether others will be encouraged to support it; and
- the Collection of Terrorist Information guideline, to provide for offenders convicted of the new offence of viewing or streaming terrorist information over the internet.
As a result of the increases to statutory maxima, the Council is proposing consequential increases for the most serious examples of offending.
The changes in culpability within the Support for a Proscribed Organisation guideline have been made to provide for the new section 12(1A) Terrorism Act 2000 offence. The factors now draw a distinction between an offender in a position of authority or influence who directly invites support for a proscribed organisation and one who expresses supportive views, being reckless as to whether others are encouraged to get involved.
The culpability factors in the Collection of Terrorist Information guideline have been amended to include offending committed by viewing or streaming terrorist information over the internet. This reflects the new legislative change made to section 58 Terrorism Act 2000 intended to reflect the rapid changes to offending in the online world.
The Council has also made some minor changes to the Funding guideline to assist judges to sentence cases where either the offender had knowledge that the money or property would or may be used for terrorism, or where the offender did not know or suspect that the money would or may be used for terrorism.
At the time of developing the current guidelines, the Council was aware that the Government was contemplating changes to terrorism legislation which could impact on sentencing guidelines. At the time of publication, the Government was yet to announce the introduction of a Bill which might take forward the changes and for that reason the Council decided to go ahead and publish the current guidelines to ensure they could be used by sentencers in court as soon as possible.
The Council made clear then that if, in the future, the legislation did change in a way that impacts the guideline, the Council would endeavour to respond in a timely manner. The Council has already consulted widely on the broader principles of terrorism offences and the proposed revisions do not make changes to that approach.
The revised guidelines apply to offenders aged 18 years and above and will come into effect in early 2020.
Sentencing Council member Mr Justice Julian Goose said:
“Terrorism offences are extremely serious and can cover a wide range of factual circumstances, making them difficult and sensitive offences to sentence. For this reason, the Council is keen to ensure that the guidelines are kept up to date and fit for purpose
“These revised guidelines will ensure consistency and transparency in the sentencing of these offences.”
Notes to Editors
- The current guidelines on terrorism were published in 2018 based on the Terrorism Acts 2000 and 2006. The Counter Terrorism and Border Security Act 2019 made significant legislative changes and the Council is revising current guidelines to reflect these.
- In 2018, the Council stated that, when considering some terrorist actions in the current climate, where a terrorist act can be planned in a very short time using readily available items as weapons, these offences are more serious than they have previously been perceived. For this reason, the guidelines published in 2018 carried increased sentence levels for some offences. Since the publication of those guidelines the new Counter Terrorism and Border Security Act 2019 has come into force increasing the statutory maximum sentences for some offences. The revised guidelines do not, therefore include an increase in sentence across all levels of the affected guidelines as the Council has already increased some sentences above sentencing practice levels.
- Sentencing guidelines must be followed, unless the court is satisfied that it would be contrary to the interest of justice to do so. If a judge or magistrate believes that a guideline prevents the correct sentence from being given in an exceptional case, he or she can sentence outside of the guideline.
- Guidelines set sentencing ranges within the maximum for the offence as set out in current legislation. The guidelines are intended to reflect current sentencing practice for these offences.
- The Sentencing Council was established by Parliament to be an independent body, but accountable to Parliament for its work which is scrutinised by the Justice Select Committee. Justice Ministers are accountable to Parliament for the Sentencing Council’s effectiveness and efficiency, for its use of public funds and for protecting its independence. Judicial Council members are appointed by the Lord Chief Justice with the agreement of the Lord Chancellor. Non-judicial council members are appointed by the Lord Chancellor with the agreement of the Lord Chief Justice.
For more information, please contact Kathryn Montague, Sentencing Council Press Office, on 020 7071 5792 / 5788 / 07912301657
Latest News from
Publication of an assessment of the 2017 update to the Magistrates’ Court Sentencing Guidelines30/03/2020 09:15:00
The Sentencing Council has published an assessment of the impact and implementation of the 2017 update to the Magistrates’ Court Sentencing Guidelines (MCSG).
Sentencing Council consults on future direction12/03/2020 12:25:00
The Sentencing Council has launched a public consultation to determine its future direction, balancing its priorities against limited resources. The consultation, which will run from 10 March to 9 June 2020, is seeking views on where the Council should focus its efforts in the next 10 years.
What next for the Sentencing Council?05/03/2020 10:25:00
April 2020 marks the 10th anniversary of the Sentencing Council.
Proposals for changes to driving disqualification guidelines published23/01/2020 15:10:00
Proposals to provide more guidance to courts in England and Wales for sentencing drivers who claim exceptional hardship when facing disqualification were launched yesterday in a public consultation by the Sentencing Council.
New sentencing guidelines for public order offences published17/10/2019 14:25:00
The Sentencing Council has published new guidelines to be used by judges and magistrates in England and Wales when sentencing offenders convicted of public order offences, following consultation.
Public confidence in sentencing and the criminal justice system08/08/2019 13:10:00
We have published a report of research carried out to help the Council better understand public attitudes towards, and understanding of, sentencing and the criminal justice system.
Sentencing Council Annual Report 2018/1915/07/2019 09:15:00
The Sentencing Council has published its ninth annual report outlining activities from April 2018 to March 2019.
New definitive guidelines for arson and criminal damage offences published05/07/2019 14:10:00
We have published new sentencing guidelines for arson and criminal damage offences that will see the courts take full account of the harm caused by offences such as arson attacks on historic buildings or criminal damage leading to severe disruption of public services.