Financial Conduct Authority
Printable version

The FCA fines, publicly censures and orders Jersey resident to pay restitution for insider dealing and improper disclosure

The FCA has recently fined Gavin Breeze £59,557 for engaging in market abuse in the form of insider dealing and has also publicly censured him for improper disclosure.

The FCA found that Mr Breeze, who holds several directorships of private companies and is also a Non-Executive Director of one AIM listed business, attempted to sell his entire 8% shareholding in MoPowered plc while in possession of inside information. Had Mr Breeze been successful, he could have avoided a loss of up to £242,000. He also passed the inside information onto another shareholder.  In addition to the fine and censure, the FCA has ordered Mr Breeze to pay restitution amounting to £1,850 plus interest of £259 to the individuals who suffered financial losses as a result of his actions. The individuals who bought Mr Breeze’s shares did so at a higher price than they would have done had the information known to Mr Breeze been public.

Mark Steward, Director of Enforcement and Market Oversight at the FCA said:

'Mr Breeze’s misconduct demonstrates the abuse of insider trading is still not well understood or appreciated, even by experienced industry professionals.  Mr Breeze has done the right thing in acknowledging his wrong-doing and offering to compensate counterparties, who were entitled to be safe from trading with or in the same market as a prohibited insider, like Mr Breeze.

Prohibited insiders, especially market professionals, will be caught and be made to account to those they have misled. While the amounts are small, the principle here is an important one and our message to market professionals in particular cannot be any clearer.’

In September 2014, the CEO of MoPowered telephoned Mr Breeze and told him the company was intending to raise new capital via a share placement. The CEO subsequently emailed Mr Breeze asking whether he would be interested in subscribing for shares at what he was told would likely be a substantial discount to the company’s current share price. Attached to the CEO’s email to Mr Breeze was a presentation setting out the company’s plans for the funds raised through the placing which included a clear statement that the information it contained was likely to be considered inside information. The FCA considers it was clear the discounted placement, once announced, was going to have a substantial impact on the company’s share price. As it turned out, when the placement was disclosed, the share price of MoPowered fell from 20.25p to 8p in the first hour of post-announcement trading.

Mr Breeze forwarded the CEO’s email and attached presentation to another shareholder who was not an insider thereby disclosing inside information. Fortunately the other shareholder did not act on the information.

Prior to the placing, the CEO emailed Mr Breeze a second time, asking if he would provide a significant level of funding in order to prevent the share placing proceeding at a considerable discount to the share price at the time. Very shortly after receiving this email, Mr Breeze instructed his broker to sell his entire shareholding in MoPowered ‘at any price’.  

The broker was able to sell 10,000 of Mr Breeze’s 1,273,500 shares before MoPowered announced the discounted share placing at 5p on Monday 22 September 2014.  As mentioned, MoPowered’s share price fell from 20.25p to 8p in the first hour of trading. In selling the 10,000 shares prior to the announcement Mr Breeze avoided a loss of £1,900 and while the FCA recognises that it is unlikely Mr Breeze would have been able to dispose of his entire shareholding at the prevailing price pre-announcement, had he been able to, he could have avoided a loss of up to £242,000.

Mr Breeze made admissions in interview and proactively cooperated with the FCA’s investigation, for which he received a discount of 15%. In agreeing to settle at the earliest opportunity, Mr Breeze received a further discount of 30%; but for this, the FCA would have imposed a penalty of £85,057.

Notes to editors

  1. The final notice for Gavin Breeze.
  2. Individuals with information about market abuse can visit the FCA’s market abuse webpage.
  3. On 1 April 2013 the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) became responsible for the conduct supervision of all regulated financial firms and the prudential supervision of those not supervised by the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA).
  4. The FCA has an overarching strategic objective of ensuring the relevant markets function well. To support this it has three operational objectives: to secure an appropriate degree of protection for consumers; to protect and enhance the integrity of the UK financial system; and to promote effective competition in the interests of consumers.
  5. Find out more information about the FCA.

 

Channel website: https://www.fca.org.uk/

Share this article

Latest News from
Financial Conduct Authority

You Cant EffectivelyManage What You Cant Effectively See or Control