National Audit Office Press Releases
The cost of EU Exit preparations
The recent (06 March 2020) report by the National Audit Office (NAO) examines how much government departments have spent preparing for the UK’s exit from the EU and what the money was spent on. It finds that by 31 January 2020, departments had spent at least £4.4 billion, while £6.3 billion was made available for EU Exit.1
Since June 2016, departments have undertaken work to prepare for EU Exit, planning for both a ‘deal’ and ‘no deal’ scenario. This study gathers information from across government departments to assess the cost of preparations.
Of the money spent, £1.9 billion was on staffing costs; £288 million on expertise and external advice; and £1.5 billion on activities such as building new systems and infrastructure.2
Overall spending was broadly in line with funding in 2016-17, 2017-18 and 2018-19. Departments reported spending £1 billion less up to 31 January 2020 than their allocation for the 2019-20 financial year. Departments may spend additional amounts in February and March on EU Exit-related activities. HM Treasury made £2 billion of additional funding available to departments in 2019-20 specifically for no deal preparations. When the prospect of no deal diminished, spending was scaled down.
Some departments have had to supplement their EU Exit allocations from existing departmental budgets. Eleven of the eighteen central government departments spent more than their allocation in 2017-18 and twelve in 2018-19. Departments estimate that £301 million of expenditure on EU Exit preparations was funded from existing departmental budgets.3
Over 22,000 staff were working on EU Exit at the peak in October 2019. This included more than 1,500 people who were moved within government to prepare for a possible no deal exit.4
Departments allocated £442 million of their funding to arm’s-length bodies to prepare for EU Exit. For example, Defra gave £111 million to the Rural Payments Agency, the body responsible for administering the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy schemes in England. Local government organisations also received £104 million in funding from departments to prepare for a range of EU Exit scenarios.
Departments have already reported to Parliament £92m in specific EU Exit costs which have been defined as losses. This includes the Department for Transport’s payments of £50m to ferry companies and £33m to Eurotunnel.
HM Treasury requires departments to produce accurate in-year monthly outturns and forecasts of spending, and to publish annual financial statements. During preparations for EU Exit, HM Treasury data provided a limited picture of cross-government EU Exit spend. In 2018-19, HM Treasury first asked departments to provide supplementary reporting on specific areas of EU Exit spend. The type of data provided was not consistent across departments, meaning it was not possible for HM Treasury to compile total figures across government.
“In preparing for EU Exit, government departments planned for multiple potential outcomes, with shifting timetables and uncertainty. This report provides, for the first time, a clear picture of how much government has spent and what that money has been spent on. “Producing this report has highlighted limitations in how government monitored spending on EU Exit specifically, and cross-government programmes more generally. Our previous work has recommended that government continues to improve the way it plans and allocates money, linking spending to objectives.”
Gareth Davies, the head of the NAO
Notes for Editors
made available to government including devolved administrations to prepare for EU Exit, between June 2016 and 31 March 2020
minimum amount departments reported they had spent preparing for EU Exit between June 2016 and 31 January 2020
peak number of staff working on EU Exit preparations
- All departments undertook work to prepare for the EU Exit, but the scale of preparation and amount spent varied greatly between departments. Three departments – the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs; the Home Office; and HM Revenue & Customs – account for more than half of government’s total EU Exit spending, at around £2.4 billion.
- These figures are based on unaudited cost information provided to us by all 18 government departments and two non-ministerial departments (the Competition and Markets Authority and the Food Standards Agency). There are limitations in the information departments have provided. As a result, the figures included in this report represent a minimum level of spend which can be attributed to preparations for EU Exit. More details on our audit approach, our evidence base and its limitations are available in Appendix One of this report.
- For more information about spending against EU Exit allocations, page 12.
- Not all departments could provide staff information for the 2016-17 and 2017-18 financial years. Most departments were only able to provide information on staff working exclusively on EU Exit and the reported figures will not reflect other staff who have spent part of their time on EU Exit work or whose usual work has been affected by EU Exit.
- For example, see Improving government’s planning and spending framework, November 2018.
- Press notices and reports are available from the date of publication on the NAO website. Hard copies can be obtained by using the relevant links on our website.
- The National Audit Office (NAO) helps Parliament hold government to account for the way it spends public money. It is independent of government and the civil service. The Comptroller and Auditor General (C&AG), Gareth Davies, is an Officer of the House of Commons and leads the NAO. The C&AG certifies the accounts of all government departments and many other public sector bodies. He has statutory authority to examine and report to Parliament on whether government is delivering value for money on behalf of the public, concluding on whether resources have been used efficiently, effectively and with economy. The NAO identifies ways that government can make better use of public money to improve people's lives. It measures this impact annually. In 2018 the NAO's work led to a positive financial impact through reduced costs, improved service delivery, or other benefits to citizens, of £539 million.
NAO Press Office
+44 (0)20 7798 7400 or email email@example.com
Latest News from
National Audit Office Press Releases
Investigation into the government’s contracts with Randox Laboratories Ltd09/08/2022 12:15:00
Government had to move very fast at the start of the pandemic to increase testing capacity, but did not document key decisions adequately when awarding a contract to Randox Laboratories Ltd (Randox) for COVID-19 testing services, according to the National Audit Office (NAO).
The Transpennine Route Upgrade Programme20/07/2022 12:05:00
Government has put the Transpennine Route rail upgrade on a firmer footing, but there remains a risk of delays and cost increases, and it is not yet clear how the upgrade’s intended benefits will be achieved, according to the National Audit Office (NAO).
Managing central government property18/07/2022 11:15:00
Managing central government property effectively helps to support government priorities such as net zero and levelling up.
Developing workforce skills for a strong economy13/07/2022 12:05:00
The country faces a major challenge in ensuring it has a sufficiently skilled workforce. Government has strengthened its approach in recent years, but it is unclear whether its interventions will deliver the step-change in skills development that is required, according to the National Audit Office (NAO).
Grassroots participation in sport and physical activity11/07/2022 16:25:00
The Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) was making some progress in increasing national participation in sport and physical activity until the impact of the pandemic reversed these gains.
Investigation into the management of the Holocaust Memorial and Learning Centre05/07/2022 15:15:00
The creation of a Holocaust Memorial and Learning Centre (the Memorial and Learning Centre) was recommended by the Holocaust Commission (the Commission) in January 2015, which stated the need for a ‘striking new memorial to serve as the focal point of national commemoration of the Holocaust … prominently located in Central London to make a bold statement about the importance Britain places on preserving the memory of the Holocaust’.
The Creation of the UK Infrastructure Bank04/07/2022 11:15:00
The UK Infrastructure Bank was launched quickly but it is not yet fully operational.
Evaluating innovation in children’s social care27/06/2022 11:15:00
Evaluating innovation and building that into decision-making is fundamental to good spending of public money.
The energy supplier market22/06/2022 11:20:00
Customers will need to pay an estimated £2.7 billion to cover the costs of 28 energy suppliers failing since June 2021, in addition to the cost of running Bulb Energy. While the supplier failures were caused by substantial increases in wholesale prices, Ofgem’s approach to licensing and monitoring suppliers over previous years increased the risk and cost of them failing, according to the National Audit Office (NAO).