The interconnected impacts of the Iraq war
Relying on weak intelligence for invading Iraq has had a negative impact on US and UK credibility with several consequences that persist to this day.
20 years on from the fateful decision to invade Iraq, it is generally accepted that the US and UK governments overstated the evidence available for them to justify military action. The central claim to defend invading Iraq was that the country had continued its illicit nuclear weapons programme and had retained illegal stockpiles of biological and chemical weapons. None of these claims supported an imminent threat justification nor could any hidden caches of WMD be found by the US Iraq Survey Group after the invasion.
In the US, President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney hinted at additional evidence which could not be shared publicly to suggest that if only people knew what the government knew, they would agree that Iraq posed a significant threat to the West and needed to be disarmed.
In the UK, the Blair government acted similarly, focusing on a narrow interpretation of the evidence provided by the intelligence services and ignoring many of the dire warnings offered by academics and other experts. The Chilcot Inquiry found that the Blair government greatly exaggerated the threat Iraq posed to the UK, and that government arguments were based on the prime minister’s personal beliefs, as well as his promise to President Bush to support the US invasion.
Relying on inadequate information and a biased analysis for invading Iraq has had a negative impact on US and UK credibility in the international security policy environment and domestically with ramifications that persist to this day.
Click here to continue reading the full version of this Expert Comment on the Chatham House website.
Original article link: https://www.chathamhouse.org/2023/03/interconnected-impacts-iraq-war
Latest News from
AI governance must balance creativity with sensitivity08/06/2023 12:20:00
Artificial intelligence (AI) can transform lives but policy and regulation must ensure it benefits all rather than maintains the status quo for a privileged few.
How will geopolitics shape Turkey’s international future?06/06/2023 12:20:00
How geopolitics will affect Turkey’s relationship with the West will depend on whether they compete or cooperate in their shared neighbourhood.
The balancing act for the UK’s semiconductor strategy02/06/2023 13:10:00
How should the UK balance economic security and the energy transition to net-zero in times of worsening geopolitical tension?
Kenya’s debt struggles go far deeper than Chinese loans01/06/2023 13:25:00
Alleged cyberattacks spotlight China’s role in Kenya’s debt problems, but must not be allowed to overshadow the country’s broader failings in its financing.
Iran: How to counter covert action in the digital age30/05/2023 15:10:00
The case of Iran shows that countering covert action in the digital age requires transparency, persistence and international cooperation. But also that it is unrealistic to expect states to stop completely.
The end of the Arab Spring and there is a price to pay24/05/2023 09:20:00
The future of the region is still up for grabs. It will be up to those who believe in democracy and progress to seize it.
Turkey’s politics on the cusp of generational change23/05/2023 15:10:00
Irrespective of the results of the presidential runoff, Turkey’s election will define its politics for decades to come.
G7 China statement could enhance global economic stability23/05/2023 13:20:00
The G7 offer to China for managing economic relations is credible, but careful implementation will be critical in persuading China to respond positively.