Time to open up our health system to “disruptive innovation,” says new IEA publication
Author Nima Sanandaji outlines how entrepreneurship in healthcare can create better outcomes
- Most of the benefits of free markets have not been transferred to healthcare;
- The UK’s centrally-planned system had problems prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, with long waiting times, inefficiencies and patient safety incidents;
- The crisis has brought about comparisons between healthcare systems across the globe – rather than the binary choice between the NHS or the US system;
- Without reform, existing issues will continue to plague health systems in Western countries;
- Further, their funding is likely to require a “substantial increase” in the tax burden as populations age;
- The organisational changes needed to drive costs down and at the same time increase quality and safety – such as economies of scale and high levels of specialisation – have not been implemented to a significant degree under welfare state models;
- “Overly strict regulations” restrict the ability to adopt radical change. The focus is on controlling healthcare costs over the short term rather than “increasing quality and fostering innovation”;
- By contrast, developing countries are not stuck in the Western model. The greater openness of health markets in countries such as India has paved the way for the “Henry Fords of healthcare”;
- Healthcare entrepreneurs show that radical innovation is possible in the sector and they are achieving substantial cost savings and productivity gains;
- Without major reform, however, it would be difficult to introduce a similar approach in Western healthcare systems;
- Large numbers of patients are already travelling to destinations such as Thailand, Mexico and India to avoid long waiting lists or save money. This trend is likely to increase as the problems with welfare-state systems intensify.
A new publication from the Institute of Economic Affairs, by Dr Nima Sanandaji, examines the lessons Western nations could learn from some developing countries in fostering innovation and entrepreneurship in healthcare. Health systems in Western countries are “plagued by inefficiency and productivity growth”: in adopting a new approach they could cut costs, increase quality, and reduce waiting times.
The Henry Fords of Healthcare outlines how, during much of the twentieth century and the beginning of the twenty-first century, Western nations embarked on a policy route in which entrepreneurship was allowed to change the service delivery model of most sectors of the economy, yet healthcare was heavily regulated and thus impeded from enacting change.
In the UK, the private sector has little freedom to change systems of health delivery: it is not allowed to use its greatest strength – innovative, disruptive entrepreneurship – to improve the way health services are offered.
Perhaps, however, it is time to change this attitude – by learning from the Henry Fords of healthcare. Just as Henry Ford revolutionised the process of car manufacturing, so innovative businesses have shown that healthcare provision can be organised in ways that reduce costs and increase quality.
The most successful firms are delivering high-quality mass healthcare at affordable prices – something that eludes Western countries. A common feature of the successful models is their use of an assembly-line approach to healthcare provision, enabling them to capture economies of scale, achieve a high degree of specialisation, and therefore provide a high volume of good quality treatment at low cost.
Without major reform, however, it would be difficult to introduce a similar approach in Western healthcare systems. The funding and organisation of healthcare often gives each local hospital the task of treating a very broad range of conditions, making high levels of specialisation harder to achieve.
Moreover, healthcare systems are frequently organised such that patients receive portions of care from a variety of health providers, which may limit economies of scale.
Even though Western welfare states have so far been relatively closed to entrepreneurship, this might change if policymakers realise that it offers an opportunity to drive down costs and drive up quality, while also reducing waiting times. Allowing more room for a “lightly regulated private sector” would encourage the kind of innovations seen in developing countries.
Growth in health tourism will enable more Westerners to benefit from entrepreneurship and innovation in healthcare, even if regulatory barriers are retained in their own countries. Large numbers of patients are already travelling to destinations such as Thailand, Mexico and India in order to avoid long waiting lists or to save money, and this trend is likely to increase as the problems with welfare-state systems intensify.
Dr Nima Sanandaji, President of the European Centre for Entrepreneurship and Policy Reform, and author of The Henry Fords of Healthcare, said:
“The core innovation of entrepreneurs such as Devi Shetty is high levels of specialisation, with rooms in the hospitals dedicated to fit a particular form of medical treatment. Doctors and nurses similarly specialise in particular treatments, becoming increasingly good at it. The route of the patient through the hospital environment is streamlined, driving down costs while retaining high quality. Healthcare is thus delivered according to well-known lean principles, something not achieved well in Western health systems, which are restricted by overregulation and bureaucracy.”
Latest News from
IEA - “Not out of the woods yet”: IEA expert responds to latest ONS employment data18/05/2021 11:35:00
Professor Len Shackleton, Editorial and Research Felllow at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, responded to today’s employment data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS)
The King's Fund responds to the Health and Social Care Committee’s report into the government’s proposals for the reform of health and social care18/05/2021 10:35:00
Richard Murray, Chief Executive of The King’s Fund, responded to the Health and Social Care Committee’s report into the government’s proposals for the reform of health and social care
Privatisation of Channel 4 is long overdue, says IEA expert18/05/2021 09:35:00
Professor Philip Booth, Senior Academic Fellow at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, responded to Culture Secretary Oliver Dowden MP’s suggestion that Channel 4 could be privatised in less than three years
Reward farmers who help fight climate and nature crisis, urges IPPR think tank13/05/2021 14:35:00
Now the UK has left the EU’s agricultural schemes, the government should seize the opportunity to transform farming to protect the environment and secure the livelihoods of farmers, according to a new IPPR report.
IEA - Nanny statists have “exploited” this pandemic, says new research13/05/2021 13:35:00
Governments are increasingly adopting higher sin taxes and more prohibitions, finds the 2021 Nanny State Index
IFS - Elective hospital admissions dropped by a third last year, while outpatient appointments and non-COVID emergency admissions each fell by a fifth13/05/2021 12:35:00
New analysis by the Institute for Fiscal Studies, Harvard University and Imperial College London shows there were 2.9 million fewer planned admissions, 1.2 million fewer non-COVID-19 emergency inpatient admissions and 17.1 million fewer outpatient appointments between March and December 2020 compared with the same period in 2019.
Policy needs to adjust following encouraging GDP data, says IEA expert13/05/2021 11:35:00
Julian Jessop, Economics Fellow at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, commented on the latest GDP and trade data from the Office for National Statistics
Queen's speech: IPPR reaction to ‘policy gulf’ on environment, planning, health and care agenda13/05/2021 10:35:00
Think tank welcomes some targets and commitments, but says bold action and clear policy must follow
Ill-considered ‘junk food’ ad ban “has to be binned”, says IEA expert13/05/2021 09:35:00
Christopher Snowdon, Head of Lifestyle Economics at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs responded to renewed government plans to ban ‘junk food’ advertising
Adam Smith Inst - "Nutty nanny statism": Government plans to ban 'junk food' advertising online and after 9.00pm11/05/2021 16:35:00
The Adam Smith Institute’s Head of Research Matthew Lesh responded to the Government maintaining plans to ban so-called ‘junk food’ from online advertising and before 9.00pm on television