To lose one college principal may be seen as misfortune. To lose three seems like carelessness.
Somehow ‘canaries in the coalmine’ doesn’t seem the right term to use for the high achieving Principals of major colleges but there is no doubt that the departure in quick succession of the leaders of three of the largest colleges in England is a clear signal that there are a number of issues in the current unstable world of FE. Newcastle College Group is the latest to lose its Chief Executive following closely after resignations at West Notts and Birmingham Met. Last year huge colleges in Hull and Sheffield had the same experience and before that there were similar problems at Ealing, Hammersmith and West London, Lewisham and many others. So what is behind this?
Firstly it’s important to note that these colleges were not ones that resisted the current government agenda; rather they were ones which wholeheartedly embraced the vision of large regional colleges, achieving economies by operating over multiple sites. Most had been members of the 157 Group (now Collab Group) enthusiastically advocating and adopting new business models and a more entrepreneurial approach to the delivery of FE. They were the vanguard, not the rear-guard; so why did it not work out?
This attrition of senior leaders has prompted Ian Pryce, Principal at Bedford College, to wonder whether Enoch Powell’s dictum that ‘all political careers end in failure’ should apply equally to college Principals. His tweet reminded me that when, during the 1980s I led a series of study tours to US Community Colleges, we learned that college leaders there ‘enjoyed’ (if that is the right word) both much higher pay and much higher turnover. As incorporation beckoned it felt like the future and sadly, that is how it has turned out.
Interestingly it’s not only colleges where following government expectations have led into crisis. Those County Councils facing bankruptcy – Northampton & Somerset in the lead – are the ones that most enthusiastically embraced the slimmed down, low tax – low service model. The bankruptcies of large training providers, which grew quickly for a while by doing exactly what government asked, further suggests that rather than the failure of individual leaders, there may be something worth looking at in terms of the way the entire system is designed.
If we look across at the private sector it’s possible to see where the government may get its inspiration. When BHS or House of Fraser collapsed, it’s simply termed ‘creative destruction’; making space for new entrants to the market. When the pressures of extreme competition make top jobs more vulnerable, the response is to seek short term success at the expense of sustainability. The lack of obvious panic in DfE about recurrent crises in FE colleges suggests that this could be the model they have in mind. Far from being a sign of failure, this turbulence may be a sign for them that the market is working well.
If this hypothesis is true, then there is certainly a need for a rethink and if it’s not there is a need for DfE to take some urgent action. Our relationship with colleges (or schools, hospitals and universities for that matter) is not the same as that with clothes shops or fast food joints. I’ve enjoyed a pastry in Patisserie Valerie but it’s no big deal if it disappears: some may mourn the loss of Maplin but we can buy IT kit elsewhere. Destabilising the major providers of adult education and skills training in our largest cities is a far more serious matter. Good training requires students to engage over years, not minutes: it requires staff able to build relationships, not just mouth ‘have a nice day’; it requires governors to be able to invest for decades, not follow short term fashion.
AoC and others are rightly drawing attention to the lack of funding in FE which is certainly part of the problem. Another issue however is the lack of a stable environment in which colleges can plan strategically rather than focus on the tactics necessary to exploit the latest policy wheeze.
Latest News from
Why NCFE is launching the #FullyFunctional campaign08/05/2019 16:15:00
NCFE has launched our campaign #FullyFunctional, calling on the Government to allow learners who achieve Grade 3 in their English and maths GCSE (equivalent to Grade D in the old system) to be given the opportunity to study alternative qualifications such as Functional Skills.
Post-18 education report03/05/2019 14:15:00
Yesterday, the Education Policy Institute (EPI) published their report, Post-18 education and funding: options for the government review.
How to use a qualification to meet your career guidance duties30/04/2019 11:15:00
NCFE are committed to helping schools meet their career guidance duties by developing solutions for employability skills development that meet the expectations of employers.
Key messages from the AAC25/04/2019 16:15:00
Guest blog by Dr Gareth Thomas, Skills and Employment Support Limited.
An opportunity to tackle mental health that is not to be missed25/04/2019 11:15:00
With worrying statistics about young peoples’ and teachers’ mental health continually reported in the media, we believe that the introduction of compulsory requirements for Health Education demonstrates a golden opportunity to tackle these issues head on.
Addressing skills gaps with NCFE24/04/2019 16:15:00
It’s no secret that we live in politically uncertain times but there is one constant in education, and that is change.
Let’s get to work on a careers strategy to support learners24/04/2019 14:15:00
Equipping young people with the skills and knowledge they need to be ready for the workplace is a challenge and schools need to be sure that they are getting their part right.
Suffolk New College learners prepare for entry to public services16/04/2019 11:15:00
Learners on the NCFE Level 2 and 3 Diploma Entry to the Uniformed Services at Suffolk New College are gaining skills for a wide range of occupational roles in Public Services.
Post-16 Education and Apprenticeship Levy Funding – Next steps for English Devolution05/04/2019 15:15:15
NCFE and the Campaign for Learning are proud to launch a new paper, ‘Post-16 Education and Levy Funding: next steps for English devolution’ - a volume of expert pieces that consider the future of the post-16 education and training budget from a devolution perspective.