National Audit Office Press Releases
Transforming Rehabilitation: Progress review
Reforms to probation services have failed to meet the Ministry of Justice’s targets to reduce reoffending and cancelling contracts with probation providers early comes at an additional cost to the taxpayer, according to today’s report by the National Audit Office (NAO).
In 2013, the Ministry embarked on a major reform of probation services. It created Community Rehabilitation Companies (CRCs) to manage low or medium risk offenders and the National Probation Service (NPS) to manage those posing higher risks. It amended its contracts with CRCs in 2017 to increase their income and stabilise failing services, but in July 2018 the Ministry announced these would be terminated 14 months early, in December 20201.
By March 2017, mid-way through the reforms, there was an overall 2.5 percentage point reduction in the proportion of reoffenders since 2011, but there was a 22% overall increase in the number of reoffences per reoffender. The Ministry expected CRCs to reduce reoffending by 3.7 percentage points over the life of the contracts, resulting in £10.4 billion of economic benefits. By March 2017, just six of the 21 CRCs consistently achieved significant reductions in the number of reoffenders.
The Ministry also has not achieved its wider objectives. Only two CRCs have delivered the IT innovation they promised and the number of people recalled to prison has increased by 47% as a result of statutory rehabilitation being extended to those serving sentences of less than 12 months. Offenders serving short sentences often find it difficult to comply with license conditions and available supervision has not been appropriate to reflect the diverse needs of these people. Between January 2015 and September 2018, offenders on short sentences as a percentage of those recalled to prison rose from 3% to 36%.
Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Probation found that CRCs have performed poorly overall, with nine out of 13 inspections assessing CRCs negatively for the quality of their work in reducing reoffending and protecting the public, and five negatively for abiding by the sentence of the courts. The NPS’s performance has been stronger, with all inspected NPS areas assessed positively for abiding by the sentence of the court, and 10 positively for protecting the public and reducing reoffending. However, the NPS has been constrained by severe staff shortages and high workloads. In August 2018, its overall staff vacancy rate was 11%, and as high as 20% in London.
The Ministry’s contracts have proved to be ineffective, hampering its ability to hold providers to account for poor services. It designed outcome-based contracts to encourage CRCs to innovate, but this did not fit well with its low risk appetite for failure. As it takes two years for data on reoffending to become available, and changes in reoffending cannot be directly attributed to CRCs’ interventions, its payment by results model was inappropriate for probation services.
The Ministry designed and implemented its reforms too quickly. It sought to transfer the risk of lower volumes of probation work to CRCs, but only tested the impact of volumes reducing by 2%. Two years into the contracts, volumes were between 16% and 48% lower than anticipated. Although this meant the Ministry was paying less to CRCs, it overestimated their ability to reduce costs as their income fell, which put them under financial pressure and affected their willingness to invest in probation services and their transformation plans.
By March 2018, CRCs faced collective losses of £294 million over the life of the contracts, compared to expected profits of £269 million, increasing the risk of providers withdrawing services, performance deteriorating further and potentially multiple providers becoming insolvent. Terminating these contracts will cost taxpayers at least £171 million2. The Ministry originally expected to pay CRCs up to £3.7 billion over the life of the contracts, but by August 2018 it was expecting to pay CRCs £2.3 billion through to December 2020 when it ends its contracts. Yet, together with its earlier unsuccessful efforts to stabilise CRCs, the Ministry will pay at least £467 million more than was required under the original contracts. The full costs will not be known until at least December 2020.
The Ministry has acted on many of the shortcomings in the reforms, including abandoning payment by results, but the NAO has identified risks with its proposals. For example, while the Ministry plans to better align probation regions, it has proposed retaining the split between the NPS and CRCs, meaning it still faces the challenge of ensuring these services work well together and with the wider system. It will also need to manage the risks of transitioning to the new contracts and existing providers withdrawing services or failing outright. For example, on 14 February, Working Links, owner of three CRCs, entered administration. The Ministry implemented its contingency plans and announced that Kent, Surrey and Sussex CRC, owned by Seetec, would become responsible for the three Working Links CRCs.
With limited time to procure new contracts, the Ministry should pause and reflect on whether its proposed approach is both deliverable and consistent with its strategic aims for the probation system, and in doing so it should consider how it will respond to the risks set out in this report. In parallel, it should publish a cross-government strategy that spells out how it will work with other bodies to reduce reoffending and develop a detailed plan for managing the wind-down period of its existing contracts.
“The Ministry set itself up to fail in how it approached probation reforms. Its rushed roll-out created significant risks that it was unable to manage. These have had far reaching consequences. Not only have these failings been extremely costly for taxpayers, but we have seen the number of people on short sentences recalled to prison skyrocket. It is welcome that the Ministry’s proposals address some of the issues that have caused problems, but risks remain. It needs to pause and think carefully about its next steps so that it can get things right this time and improve the quality of probation services.”
Amyas Morse, the head of the NAO, 1 March 2019
Notes for Editors
2.3 bn maximum forecast payments to Community Rehabilitation Companies (CRCs) from 2014 to December 2020, as at August 2018 - the Ministry of Justice’s original assumption was £3.7 billion to 2021-22 2.5 overall percentage point reduction in the proportion of proven reoffenders, covering all offenders (including those not supervised by probation services), between 2011 and March 2017 22% overall increase in the number of proven reoffences per reoffender between 2011 and March 2017 59:41 caseload split between CRCs and the National Probation Service (NPS) as at September 2018, against an original assumption, in December 2013, of 64:36 257,000 offenders supervised by probation services in England and Wales, September 2018 £294 million CRCs’ forecast losses, as at March 2018, if the contracts had continued as planned, compared with £269 million forecast profit at bid stage 14 number of months by which the Ministry is terminating CRCs’ contracts early, in December 2020 £467 million additional projected payments to CRCs above the original terms of the contracts between 2016-17 and December 2020 (£296 million) and minimum contract termination costs (£171 million) 10 aligned CRC and NPS areas the Ministry will create in England in its new probation system, replacing 21 CRCs and seven NPS regions under the current system in England and Wales
NAO Press Office
+44 (0)20 7798 7400 or email firstname.lastname@example.org
Latest News from
National Audit Office Press Releases
Investigation into pre-school vaccinations25/10/2019 13:47:00
In its report published yesterday, the National Audit Office (NAO) found NHS England has missed the Department of Health and Social Care’s (DHSC) performance standard for the uptake of nearly all pre-school vaccinations in England in 2018-19.
Fracking for shale gas in England23/10/2019 12:20:00
Progress in establishing a shale gas industry in England has been slower than government planned, according to today’s report by the National Audit Office (NAO).
The UK border: preparedness for EU exit October 201917/10/2019 11:15:00
There are risks to the UK border if the UK leaves the EU without a deal on 31 October 2019.
Exiting the EU: supplying the health and social care sectors27/09/2019 14:15:00
There is a risk of delays to supplies for health and social care if the UK leaves the EU without a deal.
Transforming courts and tribunals: a progress update13/09/2019 13:05:00
HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has made progress, but is behind schedule with its ambitious plan to reform the justice system to make it simpler and cheaper to run. It faces a significant challenge to deliver it on time and to budget, according to the National Audit Office (NAO).
Support for pupils with special educational needs and disabilities in England11/09/2019 11:15:00
While some children with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) are receiving high-quality support, many others are not getting the help they should, according to the National Audit Office (NAO). Local authorities are coming under growing financial pressure as the demand for supporting school pupils with the greatest needs rises.
Investigation into military flying training04/09/2019 11:05:00
The Ministry of Defence (MoD) is not currently meeting its targets for the number of trained aircrew it needs, according to the National Audit Office (NAO).
Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs annual accounts 2018-1922/07/2019 12:15:00
Personal Tax Credits overpayments have increased to 5.7% of tax credits spending (£1.46 billion), exceeding the HM Revenue & Customs’ (HMRC’s) target of 5%, while underpayments stood at 0.6% of expenditure (£170 million), based on estimates for 2017-18. HMRC expects levels of error and fraud in tax credits to rise further when estimated for 2018-19.
Tackling serious and organised crime01/07/2019 11:15:00
Serious and organised crime is evolving at a rapid rate. The government recognises the seriousness of this challenge and is responding, but there are still significant and avoidable shortcomings to its approach, according to the National Audit Office (NAO).