UK Higher Education has “reached a dead end,” says new IEA research
A new IEA briefing paper outlines how Covid-19 has burst the university bubble, opening up opportunity for reform
- Covid-19 is exposing the fundamentally unsound nature of the policy of successive governments and of the entire array of Higher Education (HE) institutions;
- Many universities were in a weak financial position prior to the pandemic. They are now facing a “massive cashflow crisis”;
- The present difficulties could lead to a permanent fall in demand for places in HE;
- UK policy has been heading in the wrong direction since the mid-1980s. The government is using the current interruption for a fundamental rethink;
- However, the evidence is that the political class has not yet fully grasped the extent of both the problem and the opportunity that the pandemic represents;
- There is no evidence that the UK’s economic performance has been elevated by the expansion in the number of graduates;
- The good being supplied by HE institutions is the signal a degree will send to prospective employers. The sort of competition that we see in other markets – of price competition, product variation and price differentiation – has therefore been significantly impaired;
- This has led to overextension, increasing financial fragility and a system which fails to meet labour market needs;
- These problems cannot be resolved by a continuation or expansion of previous policies. Instead, wholesale reform may be required.
A new briefing paper from the Institute of Economic Affairs, authored by IEA Head of Education Dr Stephen Davies, argues that Covid-19 has exposed the “fundamentally unsound” nature of Higher Education (HE) policy and of the entire array of HE institutions.
The pandemic has accelerated a number of pre-existing trends, revealing those sectors already in trouble. Universities are taking a big hit: overseas students have been unable to travel and study; income from other sources over the vacations has vanished; and many institutions were in a weak financial position before this crisis.
These difficulties have crystallised a feeling on the part of many people that there is something “fundamentally wrong and misguided” with the HE policy of successive British governments, with the kind of product and service that universities offer, and the way the whole system is run and financed.
UK policy has been heading in the wrong direction since the mid 1980s. While the government is using the current interruption for a rethink, it appears that the political class has not yet fully grasped the extent of the problem or opportunity that the pandemic represents. Instead, they remain fixated on the idea that graduates are the driver of economic growth. Their concern is simply that we have the wrong kind of graduate.
However, while graduates historically enjoy an income premium, there is a lot of evidence to counter the belief that having a degree makes a graduate more productive than a non-graduate. The good being supplied by HE institutions is not more productive workers but the signal a degree will send to prospective employers.
The sort of competition that we see in other markets – of price competition, product variation and price differentiation – has therefore been significantly impaired. None of these helps when the good being supplied to the actual primary customers (employers) and secondary customers (students) is the nearly homogeneous one of a signal.
It has led to overextension, increasing financial fragility and a system which “fails to meet labour market needs”. The present issues cannot therefore be resolved by a continuation or expansion of previous policies. We should resist pressure to bailout distressed and overextended institutions so that they can continue as before.
“To a Radical Degree” argues that the current crisis offers the opportunity to completely rethink HE and the good it provides, making a number of recommendations:
- Instead of having one kind of institution, modelled ultimately on the ancient universities but with most being cut-price versions, we could have several;
- There is a need to distinguish, separate and expand the genuinely human capital enhancing subjects and courses such as medicine, engineering and other STEM subjects, and vocational and trade education and training;
- We should look to move away from funding institutions out of current government spending and, by doing this, to give them greater independence and responsibility;
- The artificially inflated cost of higher education should be reduced. In particular we could look to move away from the distinctively English practice of the residential university;
- We could also consider reviving a range of different forms of attendance (which would go along with the wider range of funding methods for students);
- We should stop using HE as a certification device, and develop ways of measuring the kinds of things that a degree signals (qualities of aptitude or character and foundational ability) that do not require a three-year degree course. HE should be thought of as a good that can be valuable at any stage in life, and not for a (often spurious) supposed financial benefit.
Dr Stephen Davies, Head of Education at the Institute of Economic Affairs and author of “To a Radical Degree: Reshaping the UK’s Higher Education for the post-pandemic world,” said:
“Covid-19 has caused a short term funding crisis in UK universities. This has produced the inevitable calls for a bailout but these should be resisted, because it has also highlighted the structural problems of the way Higher Education has developed in response to government policies since the mid-1980s. This has damaged the true mission of HE and has not benefitted graduates, employers, or the wider economy.
“We should not look to either put Humpty-Dumpty back together or to slim him down and have a smaller sector but one still run on the same lines. Instead we should seize the opportunity for a radical rethink of the nature and purpose of HE and look to move to a system that is far more varied and pluralistic.”
Latest News from
IFG - Disputes over Brexit increase the need to strengthen the Sewel convention17/09/2020 10:35:00
A new Institute for Government paper says the future of the Union could be put at risk without reforms to the principle of legislative consent which lies at the heart of the devolution settlement.
IFS - Large variation in earnings returns among postgraduate degrees, with returns of more than 15% for masters in business and law, but negative returns for many arts and humanities courses17/09/2020 09:35:00
Women with a masters degree earn considerably more at age 35 than those with only an undergraduate degree, with average earnings of £35,400, compared with £32,500 for those who do not go beyond undergraduate level. For men, the differences are even larger: masters graduates earn £55,800 on average, £5,000 more than those with only an undergraduate degree.
IFS - The long shadow of deprivation: Differences in opportunities across England15/09/2020 15:20:00
A socially mobile country provides equal opportunities for everyone, across big cities and small towns, and regardless of whether your parents are rich or poor. This report makes use of newly linked administrative data on all state-educated pupils born between 1986 and 1988 to follow a group of sons from where they grew up, looking at their family circumstances and their educational achievement, through to the labour market.
IPPR welcomes furlough reform plan proposed by Labour at TUC Conference15/09/2020 14:20:00
The think tank had previously called for such a scheme to prevent mass unemployment by encouraging part-time working
Labour market deterioration “not (yet) as bad as feared”, says IEA expert15/09/2020 12:35:00
IEA Economics Fellow Julian Jessop responded to the latest unemployment statistics published by the Office for National Statistics (ONS)
JRF - Targeted furlough scheme needed as new research shows who is likely to lose their job15/09/2020 11:35:00
A new Pre-Vaccine Jobs Risk Index produced for JRF shows that sectors such as hospitality, retail and beauty, which rely on close contact with members of the public but are not within the sphere of health, care or essential services are likely to be hit hardest by coronavirus until a vaccine is found.
IFG - Deal or no deal, the government should adopt its own state aid regime15/09/2020 10:35:00
The UK would benefit from a strong ‘state aid’ system whether or not it strikes a trade deal with the EU, says a new report from the Institute for Government.
Demos - New research finds social fractures caused by Covid-19 are more divisive than Brexit15/09/2020 09:35:00
New research from the cross-party think tank Demos has found that Covid-19 has now caused deeper social fractures than Brexit. The poll finds that over half of mask wearers in Britain (58%) have severely negative attitudes towards non-mask wearers, and the vast majority (68%) of people who did not break lockdown rules have strong negative views about lockdown rule breakers.
Work Foundation report calls for Government to mitigate crisis facing retail workers10/09/2020 11:35:00
A new report from a leading UK think tank reveals the extent of insecurity within the retail sector and calls on Government to intervene and mitigate the crisis facing hundreds of thousands of workers.