UK’s Whole Force Defence Concept Not Fit For Purpose Argues RUSI Report
The UK’s Whole Force Concept — which aims to reconfigure reserves and private-sector defence personnel more closely alongside military personnel — is not fit-for-purpose and lacks overall enterprise-level planning, argues a new RUSI Briefing Paper.
‘Making the Whole Force Concept a Reality’ by John Louth and Peter Quentin examines the progress and suitability of the Whole Force Concept to the transformation of British Defence.
The Whole Force Concept is a UK defence policy that aims to encompass all personnel required to deliver Defence outputs, including: non-operational roles, covering Regular and Reserve Service personnel, Civil Servants and other civilians, including contractors.
The paper suggests that this new policy ‘has been driven by the search for financial efficiencies and the recognition that many essential defence skills now reside in the private sector rather than the armed forces.’ The problems with the implementation of the Whole Force Concept go much beyond the widely noted failure to date to recruit an increased number of reservists.
Even though this change is meant to usher in very profound change to notions of the military instrument, the report argues that the ‘Whole Force Concept has not been effectively managed and is often neglected and misunderstood’.
‘This complex and multi-part enterprise requires some focussed enterprise-level planning and management. This seems to be missing from within government, leaving the notion of the Whole Force Concept to free-wheel. This is unacceptable if UK defence now rests on the successful implementation of this idea.’
‘The case has hardly been made to the public, and how it is to be operationalised remains unclear. It is as if a new and exciting belief system has emerged without the enabling architecture of churches, priests and congregations; a great idea, but somehow lacking in physicality.’
The paper highlights the opportunities for partnering between the military and the private sector (and between companies offering goods and service to defence) presented in the Whole Force Concept. But not enough has been done to best rationalise the best mix of public sector and private sector personnel and services at a strategic level:
‘It is important to develop the thinking around the Whole Force so that defence capabilities reside where they are best managed and developed across an ever-expanding defence public-private partnership – actively shaped and deliberately managed as a whole enterprise.’
The Paper calls for ‘more overt thinking needs to be undertaken on the articulation of requirements, the provision of surge capabilities and the generation of replacements, both in theatre and right through the defence value-chain. Decision-making has to be open and subject to full Parliamentary scrutiny. So the challenge for Westminster, Whitehall and corporate boardrooms is to operationalise an idea that already forms part of the taxonomy of defence. The myriad security challenges the UK faces suggests it cannot shirk this responsibility.’
Access paper at: www.rusi.org/wholeforceconcept2014
Notes to Editors
1. Any further enquiries, please contact : Saqeb Mueen / +44(0)20 7747 2618 / +44 (0) 7917 373 069 / email@example.com
2. The authors of this paper are Professor John Louth, Director of Defence, Industries and Society at RUSI and Peter Quentin, Research Fellow in Land Warfare Studies at RUSI.
3. Download the paper at: www.rusi.org/wholeforceconcept2014
4. RUSI is an independent think-tank for defence and security. RUSI is a unique institution; founded in 1831 by the Duke of Wellington, it embodies nearly two centuries of forward thinking, free discussion and careful reflection on defence and security matters.
Latest News from
IFG - Government is guilty of repeated outsourcing failures – but Labour’s policy risks throwing away the successes17/09/2019 11:35:00
Labour’s policy of bringing public services back into government hands by default would be a mistake, argues a new report from the Institute for Government. But senior politicians have consistently overstated how much money is saved by outsourcing services.
IEA: Opposition’s school reform proposals are a “threat to freedom”17/09/2019 10:35:00
Professor Len Shackleton comments on Labour plans
IFG - The Treasury must overhaul its approach to public spending17/09/2019 09:35:00
A new report for the Institute for Government has found that public spending is often wasteful, with the government failing to set out clear spending intentions and taking decisions without clear information.
NIESR Monthly Wage Tracker: Strong earnings data driven by July bonuses and public sector pay but further pick-up unlikely12/09/2019 14:25:00
Strong earnings data driven by July bonuses and public sector pay but further pick-up unlikely.
NIESR Monthly GDP Tracker – Economic growth resumes for now10/09/2019 14:25:00
The UK economy is on course to grow by 0.3 per cent in the third quarter of 2019, a resumption of growth after a 0.2 per cent fall in the second quarter when production had slackened after being boosted in the first quarter by stockbuilding ahead of the original Brexit departure date (figure 1).
NLGN - Government must adopt a radical new approach to children's services to avert the growing crisis10/09/2019 10:35:00
New research: In the wake of the Spending Round, NLGN think tank argues the Government must adopt a radical new approach to children’s services to avert the growing crisis.
Demos - Young people and renters are being shut out of the planning system10/09/2019 09:35:00
People Powered Planning, published yesterday [9 September] by Demos, shows that engagement in the planning system is often dominated by those that are less supportive of new homes in their local area.
IFG - Government and Parliament relations deteriorating due to Brexit and minority government05/09/2019 13:35:00
A new paper from the Institute for Government looking at different areas of Parliament’s activity in the 2017-19 session finds that the relationship between Parliament and government has deteriorated in many areas, most recently in relation to prorogation.