Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
Unclear, fragmented, incoherent: MPs call for urgent action on UK’s sanctions policy
The UK's position on post-Brexit sanctions is unclear, fragmented, incoherent and risks national security, says the Foreign Affairs Committee report into the future of UK sanctions policy.
- Read the summary
- Read the conclusions and recommendations
- Read the full report: Fragmented and incoherent: the UK's sanctions policy
As a key tool for national security, the centrality of sanctions to the UK's foreign policy, national security and the rules-based international system cannot be overstated. Since most UK economic and financial sanctions are agreed and implemented by the EU, Brexit will bring about a seismic shift in how the Government approaches this essential policy area.
Unclear, muddled position on key issues
However, three years after the Referendum, MPs were deeply concerned that little high-level thought appears to have gone into considering the future of UK sanctions policy. Written and oral evidence to the Committee revealed an unclear, muddled position on key issues such as UK's power to adopt and implement Magnitsky sanctions while still an EU member and during any potential post-Brexit implementation period. Nor was it evident that the FCO had given any strategic thought to where the UK may want to continue aligning with the EU and other allies, and where the UK might want to diverge by setting sanctions of its own.
The FCO should step up to its responsibility
The report also makes clear that Government departments are not joined up enough in their approach to sanctions. This is particularly disheartening following the Committee's 2018 Moscow's Gold report, and the importance of London to the international financial system. Rather than saying that financial crime is 'not quite' the Foreign Office's 'patch,' the FCO should step up to its responsibility to crack down on the laundering of dirty money and keep the UK and its allies safe.
The Committee believes the time is right for a major review of the Government's approach to sanctions at every stage: overall strategic goals, policy planning and formation, implementation and enforcement. Government must set out a clear-eyed position on sanctions or risk sending all the wrong signals.
Robust, effective and coherent sanctions policy essential
Chair of the Committee, Tom Tugendhat MP yesterday said:
"As we prepare to leave the EU, the UK must have the best tools at our disposal. A robust, effective and coherent sanctions policy is essential.
We hoped to find that the FCO was well-prepared in this area, with a strong sense of its goals and strategic priorities. Given how serious this issue is, we really wanted to find evidence of strong partnerships across Government departments. We are deeply concerned that the evidence tells a different story. The UK has been a champion of the rules-based international system, leading the way, but the Government’s lack of clarity risks our reputation and our national security.
The UK cannot afford the risk that its sanctions policy is dictated by others. We must be ready to take responsibility for designing, implementing and enforcing our own sanctions. We urge the Government to act on the recommendations we’ve set out in the report and seize the opportunity to become a global leader in sanctions policy."
In particular, the Report:
Calls on the National Security Council (NSC)to begin an urgent review of UK sanctions policy with internal and external stakeholders, to report to Parliament by end of 2019.
- Urges Government to appoint a Senior Responsible Officer for sanctions policy across Government departments, who will be personally accountable to the NSC.
- Calls on the FCO to publish set out its position on Magnitsky sanctions before the end of June 2019.
- Supports the Treasury Select Committee’s recent call on Government to complete and publish a review of the Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation before the end of 2019.
Latest News from
Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
DCMS Committee approves appointment of Richard Sharp as next BBC Chair18/01/2021 15:33:00
MPs have confirmed the appointment of Richard Sharp as the new Chair of the BBC Board following his appearance before the DCMS Committee recently (15 January 2021).
Concerted Government effort could improve health in old age, finds Lords Committee18/01/2021 09:25:00
Ill health in old age is a growing problem, and the Government’s Ageing Society Grand Challenge is not on track to achieve its mission of five extra years of healthy living by 2035.
Committee approves appointment of Antony Jenkins and John Taylor to Prudential Regulation Committee15/01/2021 11:38:00
The Treasury Committee publishes two reports on the appointments of Antony Jenkins and John Taylor to the Bank of England’s Prudential Regulation Committee (PRC).
Decisions of the Committee 12 Januuary 202115/01/2021 09:25:00
On 12 January 2021 the Committee considered all e-petitions which had, before 7 January 2021, reached over 10,000 signatures and received a Government response, or had received a revised response.
UK and NATO must not leave Afghanistan before peace-talks conclude13/01/2021 16:15:00
The International Relations and Defence Committee publishes its report, The UK and Afghanistan.
Government response wasted opportunity to fix flaws in UC system13/01/2021 11:38:00
The Work and Pensions Committee publishes the Government response to its report Universal Credit: The wait for a first payment.
Future UK-EU relations: energy, environment and health call for evidence11/01/2021 15:20:00
The EU Environment Sub-Committee is holding a short inquiry on the UK-EU Trade and Cooperation Agreement as it relates to its remit: energy, environment, health, food trade, agriculture, fishing, climate change and chemicals.
Covid-19: How has the Government received scientific advice, and how has the advice been used? Cross-party group of MPs publish analysis08/01/2021 13:05:00
The House of Commons Science and Technology Committee today publishes its analysis of the way the Government has received, and applied, scientific evidence and advice during the first period of the coronavirus pandemic up to autumn 2020.