National Audit Office Press Releases
Use of consultants and temporary staff
Annual spending on consultants and temporary staff has reduced by £1.5 billion since 2010 when strict spending controls were introduced. However, annual spend is now increasing once more and is between £400 million and £600 million higher than in 2011-12.
“Used well, consultants and temporary staff can be an important source of specialist skills and capabilities for departments that need to transform how they do business. But such specialist staff can be expensive, costing twice as much as their nearest permanent staff counterpart. Government spending on these staff has reduced significantly since 2010, when strict spending controls were introduced, but is now increasing once more. This suggests that the underlying issues have not been fixed. Professional workforce planning to address skills and capacity gaps in key areas is essential to drive down dependency on consultants and temporary staff”.
Amyas Morse, head of the National Audit Office, 13 January 2016
According to a National Audit Office report today, better scrutiny of proposals within government since 2010 has helped to reduce annual spending on consultants and temporary staff (C&TS) by £1.5 billion. However, since 2011-12, annual spending on C&TS has gone back up by between £400 million and £600 million, while departments were reducing their permanent workforce. This pattern suggests a short-term reduction rather than a sustainable strategy.
Used well, C&TS can be a flexible and cost-effective part of a department’s workforce, for example to provide specialist skills that are required for a short period only. More of these skills may be needed following the 2015 Spending Review as departments will have to invest further in transformation projects while cutting their overall spending. Significant skills shortages remain in key areas needed to transform government, including project management and ICT.
Strategic workforce planning, assessing current staffing and skills against future needs, is critical in managing these cost pressures, but is under-developed in departments. This leads to short-term decision-making on the use of C&TS. In 2014 15, departments spent an average of 6% to 8% of the cost of their civil servants on C&TS, with individual departments ranging from 1% (HMRC) to 35% (Cabinet Office). The Cabinet Office recommends that departments review requests for C&TS but NAO found that this internal approval process is weak in some departments and the Cabinet Office itself did not always follow its own procedures. There is limited evidence so far that departments are reducing their dependence on C&TS.
Departments are generating limited competition for both consultancy and temporary staff assignments. Departments chose to use single-tender action, or extend existing contracts for 43% of consultancy work in 2014-15. The largest six consultancy firms win three-quarters of the work let through the Crown Commercial Service (CCS) cross-government consultancy agreement, while small and medium-sized enterprises win only 9% of this work (and 5% of all government consultancy work). For temporary staff appointed through CCS’s temporary staff agreement, around half are appointed without competition.
Although some elements of the way departments manage consultancy assignments have improved since 2010, problems remain. For example, the Cabinet Office recommends that consultancy assignments be paid according to a fixed price or on delivery of pre-agreed outcomes, rather than a daily rate, but only around half were in 2014-15. And departments appoint only about half of their consultancy and temporary staff through the CCS’s agreements as in many cases they are still using long-standing and local arrangements, which in some instances are more expensive than the CCS agreements. This reduces CCS’s ability to negotiate fees by using government’s spending power.
NAO analysis suggests that specialist staff are generally paid twice as much as comparable in-house staff. Departments such as the Home Office and Defra sometimes have difficulty recruiting temporary specialists and go outside the CCS agreement to pay higher rates. Cabinet Office data suggests that, between 2011 12 and 2014-15, there was an 18% increase in the full-time equivalent annual cost of temporary staff – from an average of £48,000 to £56,500.
The Cabinet Office infrequently monitors temporary staff on very high rates. As at 1 May 2015, 47 temporary staff were engaged on a daily rate of over £1,000, compared with 30 senior civil servants with comparable pay. Neither CCS nor the Cabinet Office and Defra actively manage the numbers of temporary staff who have been in post for extended periods.
Latest News from
National Audit Office Press Releases
Progress of the 2016-2021 National Cyber Security Programme15/03/2019 14:15:00
Failings in the way the Cabinet Office established its current cyber security programme mean that the government does not know whether it will meet the programme’s goals and raises questions about its plans to tackle cyber-attacks after 2021, according to today’s report by the National Audit Office (NAO).
Investigation into devolved funding13/03/2019 17:03:00
Today’s investigation by the National Audit Office sets out how HM Treasury allocates funding to Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland (the devolved administrations).
Reforming the civilian workforce11/03/2019 14:15:00
The Ministry of Defence has made little progress in reforming its civilian workforce. It has not yet modernised the roles that they perform and is missing its targets to reduce headcount and achieve savings by 2020, according to the recent (08 March 2019) report by the National Audit Office (NAO).
The apprenticeships programme07/03/2019 11:15:00
The Department for Education has some way to go before it can demonstrate that the apprenticeships programme is achieving value for money, with numbers of apprenticeships below pre-reform levels, says the National Audit Office.
Investigation into Verify05/03/2019 14:15:00
The National Audit Office (NAO) has today published its investigation on Verify, the government’s flagship identity verification portal.
Transforming Rehabilitation: Progress review01/03/2019 15:15:15
Reforms to probation services have failed to meet the Ministry of Justice’s targets to reduce reoffending and cancelling contracts with probation providers early comes at an additional cost to the taxpayer, according to today’s report by the National Audit Office (NAO).
Planning for new homes11/02/2019 11:15:00
The government’s planning system is underperforming and cannot demonstrate that it is meeting housing demand effectively, according to the recent (08 February 2019) report by the National Audit Office.
Investigation into the management of health screening01/02/2019 16:05:00
The National Audit Office (NAO) has found that the proportion of eligible adults receiving health screening is inconsistent across different areas in England and that services are not operating to the ‘agreed standards’.