Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
Value of Help to Buy uncertain
- The housing market has been boosted and many helped into home ownership but a large proportion of those buyers did not require financial help
- Financial risks both to consumers, who have insufficient protection, and the department which faces uncertainty over whether it will make a return on its investment.
- Help to Buy does not help to address other pressing problems in the housing sector.
- Read the report summary
- Read the conclusions and recommendations
- Read the full report: Help to Buy: Equity loan scheme
Help to Buy was originally intended as a short-lived scheme but will now last for 10 years and consume over 8 times its original budget, yet the value achieved from its extension is uncertain. Around three-fifths of buyers who took part in the scheme did not need its support to buy a property, and the large sums of money tied up could have been spent in different ways to address a wider set of housing priorities and focus more on those most in need. The early scheme achieved its own aims to support people into home ownership, and boost the housing market. The scheme does not address issues with the wider planning system, or other problems in housing, such as the provision of affordable housing to buy or to rent and rising levels of homelessness, nor was it designed to do so.
The Department has other programmes to address these issues, but Help to Buy remains its largest initiative by value. The Department acknowledges that the scheme has, however, only benefitted one section of society – those that are in a position to buy their own home in the first place.
Inherent uncertainty in the housing market means there are still risks to the Department achieving a positive return on its investment in homes. The new scheme from 2021 provides an opportunity to target the money more effectively, but the Department has not yet fully thought out how it will do this. Unless the Department plans alternative housing initiatives, the end of the scheme in 2023 may lead to a fall in supply, adding to the challenge it already faces in achieving its ambition of 300,000 homes a year from the mid-2020s.
“Help to Buy has certainly increased the supply of new homes and boosted the bottom line of house builders. But it has also tied up a large sum of money, forecast to be nearly £29 billion in cash terms by the time it concludes in 2023, making the value of what has been achieved uncertain.
“While many people have been helped to buy properties, who would have not otherwise been able to, an even larger group of buyers did not need its financial support.
“Help to Buy, as the Department acknowledged, only benefits those in a position to buy their own house in the first place. It does not help make homes more affordable nor address other pressing housing problems in the sector such as the planning system or homelessness”.
“The scheme exposes both the government and consumers to significant financial risks were house prices or interest rates to change. Better consumer protection needs to be built into similar schemes in the future”.
Conclusions and recommendations
Help to Buy has increased the supply of new homes and boosted the house-building sector. The financial crash of 2008 caused a loss of confidence among both developers and buyers, leading to a significant reduction in the building of new homes. From its outset, the Help to Buy scheme has unlocked demand for new homes from potential buyers by giving them a government backed loan to help them buy their own home, and therefore giving developers the confidence to increase their rate of building. This includes small and medium-sized developers, of which around 1,600 have used the scheme to date, and there has been a recent increase in the number of very small developers that are using the scheme. Help to Buy has been more successful than previous schemes with similar aims. The Department’s evaluations show the scheme has increased housing supply by around 14%.
Recommendation: The Department should identify the lessons that can be learned from the success of Help to Buy and how these can be applied to future housing schemes.
While Help to Buy has helped many people to buy properties who otherwise would not have been able to, a large proportion of those who took part did not need its help. By December 2018, the scheme had supported some 211,000 households to buy properties, through loans totalling £11.7 billion. Some 37% of buyers said they could not have bought a property at all without the support of the scheme. This implies that around three-fifths of buyers did not need the support of the scheme to buy a property, although some research suggests that even those who could afford to buy were not doing so because of wider economic uncertainty. Around 20% of people who have used the scheme were not first-time buyers. From 2021, the Department will restrict the scheme to first-time buyers, and is introducing lower regional price caps that will reduce the number of purchases through the scheme and should better focus the scheme on those who most need help. Regional price caps could mean that the scheme may not work well in some areas within the regions. While the Department has committed to monitoring the situation, having already set the caps, it seems unwilling to change them, creating a risk they may not work in the way intended. Despite this, the Department has not assessed the likely impact of the changes to the scheme from 2021.
Recommendation: The Department should report to the Committee in spring 2020 on the impact it expects changes to the scheme to have from 2021 and how it will ensure that regional prices caps work effectively across regions.
The Department has allowed the scheme to become a semi-permanent feature of the housing market, and has not yet thought through the changes needed to improve the value to be achieved from the new scheme. Help to Buy was designed as a short-term solution to address the collapse in housing supply after the financial crash. The original phase, from 2013 to 2016, stabilised the housing market and increased developer and buyer confidence, leading to increased demand for, and supply of, new-build properties. However, the additional funding for the scheme announced in 2017, when the housing market had improved, might not have been necessary or delivered enough value. The Department’s two evaluations of the scheme cover the period up to March 2017. Some developers now sell nearly half their properties with the support of Help to Buy. The Department acknowledges that the scheme is no longer as needed as it was in 2013 and that it should now plan for the end the scheme. The planned changes to the new scheme from 2021 will reduce its reach and begin to wean developers off the scheme. The Department has the opportunity to go further and use the new scheme to address concerns about undesirable practices by some developers, particularly given our recent concerns that developers are not fulfilling their commitments to fund infrastructure and build affordable housing. The Department has committed to using the scheme to ban the sale of houses as leasehold and to enforce building quality standards.
Recommendation: The Department should undertake a further evaluation of the scheme, to understand its value and necessity from 2017 and to inform the design and operation of the new scheme.
Recommendation: The Department should report back to the Committee in spring 2020 on how it is working with developers to plan the new scheme from 2021, so that it addresses concerns about developers’ behaviour, and achieves at least as much value.
The Department’s lack of curiosity over why and how buyers are redeeming their loans gives rise to uncertainty over whether the Department will make a return on its investment. The Department currently forecasts that it will make a positive return in cash terms on its investment in Help to Buy, although it acknowledges that the housing market is unpredictable and that it may make a small loss once inflation is taken into account. House prices are now static, or falling in some areas, following a period of price rises over the first five years of the scheme. Some 50% of buyers who bought in the first year of the scheme have redeemed their loans, a higher rate than the Department forecast. A good understanding of how, when, and why buyers are redeeming their loans is essential to make accurate predictions about the amount and timing of the likely return, yet the Department is unable to explain why redemptions to date have been higher than expected. This lack of understanding of the reasons for higher redemptions means the Department does not know how buyers may behave in future.
Recommendation: The Department should, by the end of December 2019, publish an analysis of the reasons for people redeeming to date – who, when, where, how, and why.
The Department’s decision to keep equity loans as unregulated products means there is insufficient protection for buyers. Help to Buy loans are a significant financial commitment for buyers. Buyers with loans which are still outstanding after five years must pay interest, at a rate which increases each year. For those who keep their loans over a longer period, the amount of interest owed could add a significant amount on top of their regular mortgage payments. Some buyers may not fully appreciate the potential impact of these interest payments on their finances. Surprisingly, the Department’s Help to Buy loans are not subject to regulation by the financial authorities, unlike mortgages where buyers are protected through regulation. So far, buyers have not been paying more for Help to Buy properties than other new-builds. However, the scheme is only available for new-build properties, which can cost up to 20% more than existing properties, thereby increasing the risks to the buyer. The Department does not fully understand the scale or effect on buyers of this “new-build premium”, including the potential impact for those who need to sell soon after purchase, when their property may be worth less that they paid for it.
Recommendation: The Department should write to the Committee by the end of December 2019 to explain how it intends to put in place better consumer protection arrangements for similar products in the future.
Recommendation: As part of its next evaluation, the Department should examine the new-build premium, and the impact Help to Buy has had in relation to this.
The Department does not have an integrated and coherent plan for achieving its commitment to deliver 300,000 new homes per year from the mid-2020s. The increase in house building generated by the Help to Buy scheme is one of the ways in which the Department will achieve its aim of increasing the supply of new homes. The Department is, however, unable to quantify how much it expects the Help to Buy scheme to contribute to its stated commitment to deliver 300,000 new homes annually from the mid-2020s. The Department is winding down the scheme from 2021, but has not estimated the expected drop in housing supply when the scheme ends in 2023, nor does it have a clear plan for offsetting the drop. The Department expects to spend more on other initiatives, such as affordable housing and infrastructure loans for developers to boost housing supply. The Department is relying on engagement between developers and local authorities to address gaps in supply at a local level. The Department is also working alongside developers so that they can offer their own solutions for first-time buyers. However, we remain unconvinced that the Department’s many housing initiatives are fully aligned with one another to form a cohesive strategy for achieving the 300,000 target.
Recommendation: The Department should, by the end of December 2019, set out how it will achieve its ambition for 300,000 homes per year without the contribution from the Help to Buy scheme after 2023.
The Help to Buy scheme is not making homes more affordable for society in general or helping address other pressing problems in the housing sector. The Department has a significant amount of capital invested in the Help to Buy scheme, with the total size of the loan book on Homes England’s balance sheet now equivalent to that of a medium-sized building society. The Department acknowledges that the scheme has, however, only benefitted one section of society - those that are in a position to buy their own home in the first place. The scheme does not address issues with the wider planning system, or other problems in housing, such as the provision of affordable housing to buy or to rent and rising levels of homelessness, nor was it designed to do so. The Department has other programmes to address these issues, but Help to Buy remains its largest initiative by value. The scheme is no longer as needed as it was when it was introduced in 2013, because mortgage availability has improved. Despite this, the Department will continue to commit considerable sums of money for another four years until the scheme ends in 2023, as it believes developers and lenders will need this time to adjust to a regime without the scheme’s support.
Recommendation: The Department should report back to the Committee by the end of December 2019, setting out how its different housing policies and initiatives work together to address England’s housing crisis.
Latest News from
Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
Government “blind” to “extreme risks” of investment by cash-strapped councils14/07/2020 15:33:00
In a report published yesterday, Monday 13 July 2020, the Commons Public Accounts Committee says that some councils have exposed themselves to commercial investments which risk cuts in local services and a big bill for local taxpayers.
Business and Planning Bill illustrates challenges of fast-track law-making13/07/2020 15:33:00
The Constitution Committee publishes its ninth report of the session on the Business and Planning Bill.
Business and Planning Bill illustrates challenging of fast-track law-making10/07/2020 16:20:00
The Constitution Committee publishes its ninth report of the session on the Business and Planning Bill.
BEIS Committee to hear pitches for future Committee inquiries10/07/2020 15:20:00
On Thursday morning, the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) Committee will hear a series of pitches as the case is made for their chosen business, energy policy or climate change issue to be investigated by the BEIS Committee over the course of this Parliament. The ‘dragons-den’ style session format follows a call (in March) for the public to submit their own ideas for future Committee inquiries.
UK still has no coherent strategy for engaging with Africa10/07/2020 14:20:00
The International Relations and Defence Committee publishes its report on The UK and Sub-Saharan Africa: prosperity, peace and development co-operation.
Insufficient time allowed for effective treaty scrutiny says Lords report10/07/2020 13:20:00
The International Agreements Sub-Committee have today published a report aimed at addressing the ‘deficiencies of Parliament’s treaty scrutiny process’, including suggestions that the Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010 (CRAG) does not provide enough time to conduct effective scrutiny.
England faces “serious risk of running out of water within 20 years”10/07/2020 12:20:00
In a report published yesterday, the Public Accounts Committee says all the bodies responsible for the UK’s water supply – Defra, Ofwat and the Environment Agency – have “taken their eye off the ball” and must take urgent action now to ensure a reliable water supply in the years ahead.
EU Committee criticises lack of engagement by Northern Ireland Office09/07/2020 15:33:00
The Lords EU Committee has written to Rt Hon Brandon Lewis MP, Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, expressing disappointment at the lack of engagement from his department in support of the Committee's scrutiny of the Protocol on Ireland/Northern Ireland.
COVID-19 Rapid Summary: Therapeutics09/07/2020 13:33:00
The House of Lords Science and Technology Committee is producing rapid summaries of oral evidence sessions, aimed at providing the public with the latest information on the Science of COVID-19.
Committee demands detailed plan for PPE from DHSC within 2 months, ahead of potential second Covid wave08/07/2020 15:33:00
In a report published today, Tuesday 7 July 2020, the Public Accounts Committee warns that Government does not have either a clear understanding of the equipment needed for clinical and care workers, or how to distribute it – particularly in the more fragmented care sector.