Why the G7 trade track must last beyond UK presidency
With Germany and Japan next in line for leading the G7, these two champions of global trade should continue to carry the baton of a separate trade track.
Although the UK’s G7 presidency is featuring a dedicated trade track for the first time because there are key factors which make 2021 a particularly opportune moment to develop one, this new approach must not become a one-off. Establishing the G7 trade track as a meaningful format for coordinating positions on global trade among a small group of advanced industrial economies should be a key aim for the UK’s presidency.
Germany’s upcoming G7 presidency in 2022 and Japan’s in 2023 means two major advocates of global trade are in prime position to continue the separate trade track, but currently it is not self-evident that they will.
At this week’s meeting, G7 leaders are likely to set out a broad vision for global trade in the context of the pandemic – by focusing on the role trade can play in the economic recovery and strengthening resilience – and in the wake of Donald Trump’s presidency – by reaffirming their commitment to the multilateral trade system.
While joint statements at the highest political level are worthwhile, it is in the interest of the UK to make the 2021 G7 trade track as substantive as possible and for it to have specific initiatives to work on long-term so it can continue beyond 2021.
Click here to continue reading the full version of this Expert Comment on the Chatham House website.
Latest News from
Russia and 9/11: Roads not taken10/09/2021 12:20:00
Many Russia watchers recall the fleeting moment 20 years ago when the country could have moved away from a path of confrontation with the US.
The dangerous impact of 9/11 on arms control measures09/09/2021 15:38:00
Momentous decisions made during the post-2001 era have failed to control weapons of all types, but now is the time to put right those wrongs.
Learnings must become practice as the Taliban return09/09/2021 12:20:00
There is greater awareness of the adverse impact of counterterrorism measures and sanctions on humanitarian action.
Facing reality is painful for the US and its allies06/09/2021 16:20:00
Experts from across Chatham House analyse the strategic and intelligence failures in Afghanistan, and the lasting effects on the US, UK, NATO and the EU.
With Afghanistan, control is much harder than victory06/09/2021 09:20:00
The Taliban taking charge of Afghanistan is likely to significantly destabilize the wider region, as the various militant threats will be hard to manage.
Iraqis protest is symptom of embedded corruption03/09/2021 16:20:00
Hospital fires and electricity cuts have prompted angry protests, and many Iraqis see government corruption and mismanagement as the root of their suffering.
Middle East prepares for the US to exit Syria03/09/2021 09:20:00
The Arab world has taken note of the withdrawal from Afghanistan and is starting to wonder whether Syria, with several hundred US troops, will be next.
New roles for military in health emergency preparedness31/08/2021 15:10:00
New guidance from the WHO outlines how the military and health sectors can work together to be ready for future infectious disease outbreaks.