Citizens Advice has called on the government to improve the quality and accuracy of the application and assessment process for Personal Independence Payments (PIP), as well as the system which allows people to submit additional evidence as part of their claim.
The national charity was responding to the second review of PIP, published last week.
In the last 12 months Citizens Advice has helped people with almost 400,000 PIP problems, up 37% on the previous year.
Chief Executive of Citizens Advice Gillian Guy said:
“Anyone trying to get on with life while coping with a serious illness or disability deserves a quick and accurate experience when applying for personal independence payments (PIP).
“PIP is the single biggest advice issue people turn to Citizens Advice about and in the last 12 months we helped with almost 400,000 PIP problems. While some parts of the system have got better - such as a reduction in waiting times - we are concerned there is still a way to go in terms of improving the quality and accuracy of the PIP application and assessment process.
“It’s good to see the review recognises the need to improve the system around additional evidence which people can submit when they apply for PIP. Many currently find this confusing and don’t know what to send in. It can also take a lot of time and money to get the evidence you need, like a note from the GP.
“It’s vital the the government pays close attention to the issues highlighted by this review and takes meaningful action to tackle the ongoing flaws with the PIP process which stop people getting the help they need to live their lives.”
Case studies:
Citizens Advice helped one woman with fibromyalgia and depression who had a two hour home visit booked for her PIP assessment. The assessor turned up early, rushed the assessment and left after just half an hour. The woman’s application was turned down, and she’s now appealing, which is causing financial and emotional strain.
In another case a man who is disabled and uses a wheelchair was given a PIP appointment over 25 miles away. He needed to take two buses to get there, and then it turned out the centre wasn’t wheelchair accessible.
Notes to editors