FRC: Audit firm transparency reports not visible enough and ineffective

30 Sep 2019 01:20 PM

Transparency reporting by accountancy firms performing audits is currently ineffective with a lack of awareness amongst investors and Audit Committee Chairs that the reports even exist and many being used as a marketing exercise, according to a review from the Financial Reporting Council (FRC).

While mandatory Transparency Reports broadly contain the required information, for those aware of the reports, there is a view they are too long and overly positive to be useful. The FRC is concerned that many firms treat the reports wrongly as a marketing tool which damages their perception among stakeholders and limits their usefulness.

Other findings of the review include:

The FRC is calling on firms to reduce the length of their Transparency Reports and explain within them the challenges they are facing in seeking to deliver consistently high-quality audits, along with their assessment of how successful they are being at meeting those challenges.

Sitting alongside the reports on audit quality that the FRC publishes, Transparency Reports by the firms should provide stakeholders with important information about each firm’s quality processes and initiatives to improve audit quality.

David Rule, Executive Director of Supervision at the FRC, recently said:

“Transparency is vital to creating public trust in audit. Despite some improvements there is much more to be done to convince users to read and discuss these reports with the firms.

“Audit Committee chairs and institutional investors should be fully aware that the reports exist. The most effective way to improve the reports is direct dialogue between stakeholders and the firms, and given this is publicly available information, there should be no barriers to this happening.”

The FRC review of Audit Firms’ Transparency Reporting can be viewed here.  

Contact the Press Office

William BoyackCommunications Manager