The government’s spending plans mean it will struggle to narrow gaps in educational outcomes, address the crisis in the SEND system and tackle teacher shortages by the end of this parliament, warns a new Institute for Government report funded by the Nuffield Foundation.
The latest in the IfG’s annual Performance Tracker series, published yesterday, is a new analysis of falling pupil numbers, SEND and financial pressures facing the education system, staffing, and performance of schools in England.
It finds that the government’s ‘opportunity mission’ – to break the link between a child’s background and their future success – will be difficult to achieve without a far more joined-up approach to SEND reform. And its plan to tackle workforce pressures will only succeed if it is more closely tied to current teacher shortages.
Balancing these pressures will be extremely difficult within the budget Labour has set for the coming parliament.
Key findings in the report include:
- The equivalent of 23,000 primary school classrooms are empty across England, the highest number since records began in 2009–10.
- London’s classrooms are emptying nearly two times faster than any other region’s: since 2018–19, its primary schools have lost 8.1% of their pupils – a drop of 55,200, or around 2,060 classes.
- Coastal primary schools have also been hit particularly hard, losing 4.7% of their pupils since 2018–19, compared to 3.4% in non-coastal primaries.
- Two-thirds of state special schools are now operating over capacity.
- Spending on SEND has grown from £6.7bn in 2012/13 to £11.1bn in 2025/26, a two-thirds (66%) increase.
- The average education, health and care plan costs £1,000 more than the funding it attracted in 2023/24.
- Pupils with education, health and care plans now miss a full day of secondary school every week, on average.
- In 2023–24, there were an average of five suspensions in every secondary school class, more than double the highest rate seen pre-pandemic.
- Suspensions are now 10 times more common among pupils living in the most deprived areas than among those in the least deprived areas.