WiredGov Newswire (news from other organisations)
|Printable version||E-mail this to a friend|
Clarification of the constitutional position in a hung Parliament
Recent newspaper stories suggest there is confusion among the parties and the media about the constitutional position if the election produces no overall winner.
Cabinet Office Manual guidelines for a hung parliament
The Cabinet Office Manual setting out the procedure to be followed in a hung Parliament is a balanced and accurate statement of the existing constitutional conventions.
By making these guidelines public for the first time, before the election, Sir Gus O'Donnell, the Cabinet Secretary, has sought to ensure that everyone knows what the position will be in case no party wins an overall majority on Thursday.
In the case of a hung parliament Gordon Brown remains Prime Minister until either he decides he can no longer command the confidence of the House of Commons or he loses the vote at the end of the Queen’s speech debate.
It is his duty to stay in office until it becomes clear which party or combination of parties can command the most support in the new Parliament. There are clear precedents for that, with Baldwin in 1923, and Heath in 1974. We must always have a government, and until a new government can be formed the present government carries on.
However, following a tightening of the guidelines, ministers are constrained by the election purdah rules which ensure they should not take actions which could be deferred and which might bind their successors.
In practice, the political realities of how many seats each party has will affect how long the period is before a stable administration is formed.
Post election intervals
There have also been reported criticisms about the 12 day interval before Parliament meets to elect the Speaker, and the 19 day gap before the Queen’s Speech on May 25, in both cases a week longer than normal after recent general elections.
The recommendation of these longer intervals, by the independent Institute for Government in its report Transitions: Preparing for Changes of Government and by the all-party Commons Modernisation Committee, was nothing to do with the possibility of a hung parliament.
It was suggested to allow a slightly longer period both for the induction of the large number of new MPs after the election and for new ministers to get to know their new departments and to prepare legislative proposals for the Queen's Speech.
Prof Robert Hazell (Director, Constitution Unit)
Peter Riddell (Senior Fellow, Institute for Government)