WiredGov Newswire (news from other organisations)
Printable version E-mail this to a friend

Brown Review into railways a missed opportunity, says the TUC

Richard Brown's Review into rail franchising, published yesterday (Thursday), has missed the opportunity to improve the UK's rail system, says the TUC.

Mr Brown concludes in his report that rail franchising is 'not broken' but the TUC has expressed disappointment that he appears to have joined the government in turning a blind eye to the problems of rail privatisation.

Research, published by the TUC's Action for Rail campaign last October, revealed that train operating companies (TOCs) made a £2.7bn net gain from taxpayers in 2011-12.

This analysis of official figures shows that in return for paying £1.17bn in premium costs to run services, companies received total public subsidies of £3.88bn in 2011-12.

Despite being huge net recipients of public money, the TUC says serious questions remain about the value that private train operators are providing.

A study published last year by Transport for Quality of Life estimated that train operating companies contributed just one per cent of the investment that went into improving the UK's railways.

This contrasts sharply with the total cost of privatised rail estimated by the Transport for Quality of Life report to be around £1.2bn per year.

The TUC has long been warning that the cost of franchising has resulted in the most expensive fares in Europe, and comes at a time when the government is planning to close ticket offices, and remove staff from trains and stations.

TUC General Secretary and chair of the Action for Rail campaign Frances O'Grady said: 'This report shows how successive models of franchising have failed. However, instead of recognising that privatised rail operators are ill-equipped to provide a sustainable long-term public service, the review concludes that the UK needs more of the same.

'Our current system of corporate welfare - where train operators make a play of bidding for contracts knowing that their future revenue will be underwritten by the taxpayer - sadly looks here to stay.

'With such high costs associated with franchising and so little innovation or investment coming from the private sector, it is increasingly hard to justify the point of franchising.

'Nothing appears to have been learned from the success of the publicly-owned East Coast Mainline, which has re-invested profits back into services. Instead, public rail subsidies will continue to end up in the pockets of shareholders. That is not my idea of putting passengers first and this review is a huge missed opportunity.'

NOTES TO EDITORS:

- Action for Rail is a campaign involving the TUC, and its affiliated unions with members working on the railways - ASLEF, RMT, TSSA and Unite. Its aim is to work with passenger groups, rail campaigners and environmentalists to campaign against cuts to rail services and staffing and to promote the case for integrated, national rail under public ownership. For more information please visit www.actionforrail.org

- All TUC press releases can be found at www.tuc.org.uk

- Follow the TUC on Twitter: @tucnews

Contacts:

Media enquiries:
Liz Chinchen T: 020 7467 1248 M: 07778 158175 E:
media@tuc.org.uk
Rob Holdsworth T: 020 7467 1372 M: 07717 531150 E:
rholdsworth@tuc.org.uk
Alex Rossiter T: 020 7467 1337 M: 07887 572130 E: arossiter@tuc.org.uk

PDNS: Mandatory Active Cyber Defence for Public Sector Networks. Latest Guide